1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Anthropology
Holistic study of humans—biological, cultural, linguistic, archaeological.
Uses global, comparative, 4-field approach.
The Explanatory Period
Shift from description to explaining culture change.
Introduced: renewed evolutionism, systems theory, ecosystem concept, and deductive reasoning.
Much of this was packaged as Processual / New Archaeology.
Julian Steward - Cultural Ecology
Argued that environment + resources shape a culture’s core features.
Studied Shoshone and Virú Valley to link subsistence, tech, and land use to environment.
Saw culture change as multi-linear evolution (different paths in different ecologies).
Cultural Core
Parts of culture most directly tied to environmental adaptation.
Includes: subsistence & technology, social organization, economic practices.
Distinguished from “secondary” traits (art, religion, ideology) shaped more by history.
Leslie White
Neo-Evolutionary Theory.
Divided culture into technological, sociological, and ideational sectors.
Saw culture as humans’ exosomatic (outside-the-body) means of adaptation.
Cultures “evolve” as they become more efficient at capturing energy from the environment.
Systems Theory and Ecosystem Concept
Culture seen as interacting subsystems (tech, social, ideology) within an ecosystem.
Borrowed from engineering + ecology (cybernetics).
Computers allowed simulation models and complex data handling.
Processual Approaches - Methods List
Deductive reasoning (hypothesis → test).
Ethnographic analogy (direct-historical & comparative).
Middle-range research (bridging arguments).
Experimental archaeology.
Ethnoarchaeology (actualistic studies).
Franz Boas and Four Field Anthropology
Founded U.S. four-field model: bio, cultural, linguistic, archaeology.
Promoted holism and rigorous science.
Pushed salvage anthropology: document Indigenous cultures before colonial destruction.
Salvage Anthropology
Rapid recording of languages, stories, tech, and lifeways of Indigenous peoples.
Response to disease, residential schools, land loss, cultural suppression.
Shaped North American anthropology’s integration of archaeology with ethnography.
Four Subfields of Anthropology
Biological/Physical Anthropology: evolution, human variation, forensic/bioarchaeology.
Cultural Anthropology: living cultures; ethnography; participant observation.
Linguistic Anthropology: language structure, history, sociolinguistics.
Archaeology: past cultures through material remains.
What is culture
Learned, shared, symbolic system shaping human behavior.
Includes beliefs, knowledge, customs, morals, arts (Tylor).
Transmitted through enculturation.
Cultural idiolect
Individual variation in how people express culture (dress, style, behavior).
Analogy to an individual’s idiolect in language.
Visible in potlatch costumes, personal adornment, etc.
Enculturation
Process where individuals learn cultural norms, values, behavior.
Key to cultural continuity and change.
Culture: Ideational Perspective
Focuses on ideas, symbols, mental structures shaping behavior.
“Get inside people’s heads” to understand meaning.
Emphasizes symbolic codes.
Culture: Adaptive Perspective
Focuses on subsistence, technology, demography, ecology.
Culture = system that adapts humans to environment.
Linked to cultural ecology (Steward).
KW Potlatch
Example of ideational vs. adaptive culture.
Ideational: symbolic prestige, status competition, ritual meaning.
Adaptive: redistributes food, builds alliances, buffers resource shortages.
Both perspectives necessary.
Scientific approach: Processual
Uses hypothetico-deductive method.
Objective, systematic, explicit, empirical.
Seeks general laws, causal explanations, predictions.
Associated with Binford.
Scientific method: Archaeology
Define problem
Form hypotheses
Identify expectations
Collect data
Compare data to expectations
Revise/retest
(Shown in Moundbuilder case).
Humanistic approach
Post-processual.
Emphasizes meaning, symbolism, agency, historical context.
Argues no single objective truth; interpretations are situated.
Reflexive, emic perspective; influenced by postmodernism.
Associated with Ian Hodder.
Scientism
Critique.
Incorrect belief that scientific method alone yields infallible truth.
Archaeology rarely retests previous hypotheses due to funding priorities.
Chaos theory shows limits of prediction in complex systems.
Lewis Binford and The New Archaeology
Sought rigorous, scientific archaeology using hypotheses and testing.
Emphasized culture as a system (technic, sociotechnic, ideotechnic).
Used ethnographic analogy + middle-range theory.
Systems Theory
Culture seen as interrelated subsystems: technology, social organization, ideology.
Borrowed from engineering and ecology.
Enabled modeling, simulation, use of computers.
Deductive reasoning
Start with hypothesis → derive expectations → test with archaeological data.
Contrast to earlier inductive “let the data speak” approach.
Sometimes over-relied on positivism.
Ethnographic analogy
Processual use.
Uses living cultures to infer past behavior.
Direct-historical or comparative analogy.
Often limited by lack of detailed analogs.
Middle Range Research
Bridges dynamic behavior ↔ static archaeological patterns.
Uses ethnoarchaeology + experimental archaeology.
Essential to explaining site formation & activity patterns.
Experimental archaeology
Controlled replication of past activities (toolmaking, structure-building).
Tests feasibility; produces archaeological correlates.
Limited because modern conditions differ from past.
Ethnoarchaeology
Observes living people to understand material consequences of behavior.
Challenges: short observation period, reoccupation, natural disturbance.
Postmodern Influence
Rejects universal truths; emphasizes subjectivity, power, context.
Multiple realities; narratives shaped by social position.
Archaeology becomes interpretive & reflexive.
Low-level Theory
Basic observations from field/lab (artifacts, features, soils).
Empirical description and classification.
Foundation for higher-level interpretation.
Middle-Level Theory
Links material remains → behaviors that produced them.
Ethnoarchaeology + experiments + taphonomy.
Core of Processual archaeology.
High-level Theory
Broad social theories about cultural change, meaning, organization.
Why questions: inequality, identity, ideology, complexity.
Includes processual & post-processual debates.
Emic perspective
Insider’s view; subjective, culturally embedded meaning.
Used by humanists, symbolic anthropologists, post-processualists.
Example: understanding Azande witchcraft beliefs.
Etic perspective
Outsider’s analytical, objective viewpoint.
Used by processual scientists; seeks general patterns.
Example: functionalist explanations of institutions.
Ideational vs Adaptive Strategies
Ideational: focus on meaning, symbols, mental models.
Adaptive: focus on environment, subsistence, technology, demography.
Maps onto emic/etic divide.
Moundbuilder Myth
Early colonists believed mounds built by a lost “superior race.”
Jefferson’s excavation disproved battle-victim hypothesis.
Cyrus Thomas (1894) concluded mounds built by ancestors of Native Americans.
Demonstrates hypothesis testing & rejection.
Potlatch in Cultural System Terms
Idiolect: masks, costumes, personal styles.
Shared Modal Aspects: rules, reciprocity, ranked society.
Cultural System: redistributes wealth; reinforces hierarchy; adaptive + symbolic roles.
Talthelei Snow Cache Example
Taltheilei lacked boulder caches found in Inuit sites.
Ethnoarchaeology showed Inuit using snow caches for meat storage.
Soil analysis revealed elevated Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn → blood/fat residues.
Supports hypothesis that snow caches were used but left no archaeological trace.