1/14
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
What is the Working Memory Model?
By Baddeley & Hitch, to replaced the STM store of the MSM due to the simplification of the STM, developed by dual task study
STM is more complex
STM is an active processer, holding multiple different types of information simultaneously while being worked on
Draw a diagram of the WMM.

Outline the Central Executive.
Supervisory function: Controls attention, receives sense information & filters this before passing on to relevant slave systems. (i.e. controls slave systems)
- Used for reasoning tasks
Limited capacity: 4 +/- items (3-5)
- Can only work on one type of information at a time but can switch between different inputs
Encoding: Can process information from any sensory modality
Outline the phonological Loop.
Stores: Verbal information in a speech based form
1) Primary acoustic/phonological store = The inner ear, holding words recently heard
2) Articulatory process = The inner voice (used for maintenance rehearsal), holds information via sub-vocal repetitions
Limited capacity: What can be said in 2 secs
Outline the Visuospatial Sketchpad.
Stores: Visual & spatial information
Visual cache: A passive store of colour & form
Inner scribe: Active store holding the relationships between objects in 3D space
Limited capacity: Holds 3-4 objects at a time
Outline the Episodic Buffer.
Holds & integrates information from the VSS, CE & PL (all of them)
Temporary storage, sends information to LTM
Can hold any type of information (any code)
Outline Baddeley & Hitch (1974) research supporting the WMM.
PROCEDURE:
Lab experiment, repeated measures
Participants asked to perform 2 tasks at the same time (dual task technique)
A digit span task (repeat a list of numbers) & a verbal reasoning task (true or false Qs)
RESULTS:
As numbers increased, participants took longer to answer reasoning questions (only by a fraction of a second)
As numbers increased, they didn’t make any errors in the VR task
CONCLUSION:
VR task made use of the central executive & the digit span task made use of the phonological loop
It’s easier to do 2 tasks at the same time if they use different processing systems (verbal & visual) than if they use the same slave system
Outline the case of KF supporting the WMM.
KF had brain damage following motorcycle accident which affected his STM
His impairment was mainly for verbal information, his memory for visual information was largely unaffected
- e.g. could remember faces but not sounds
Shows there’s separate STM components for visual information (visuospatial sketchpad) & verbal information (phonological loop)
Outline Prabhakaran et al 2000 research in existence/location of episodic buffer.
PROCEDURE:
Lab experiment, independent designs
Used brain imaging FMRI scans
Participants asked to complete tasks w/ equal amounts of spatial & verbal information (dual task investigation)
RESULTS:
Condition 1 = more activation in the prefrontal cortex when information integrated
Condition 2 = posterior brains region active when not integrated
CONCLUSION:
Suggest EB exists & is in the prefrontal cortex when information integrated
A brain region specialised in the combination & temporary storage of visual & verbal information
Biological evidence for existence of EB
Outline Hunt (1980) research in Central Executive.
PROCEDURE:
Lab experiment, repeated measures design
Participants performed 2 tasks
1) Psychomotor task (moving lever with their hand)
2) Visual Intelligence task (reasoning about visual patterns)
- Tasks performed either alone or together (1 or 2 or both)
RESULTS:
When tasks done together performance got worse on the psychomotor task
As the visual problems got harder, performance on the psychomotor task deteriorated
CONCLUSION:
Proves central executive has limited capacity
Outline Baddeley, Grant, Wright & Thompson (1973) research into visuospatial sketchpad.
PROCEDURE:
Lab experiment, independent measure, dual-task technique
1) A primary tracking task (following spot of light w/ a pointer) whilst simultaneously doing secondary visual imagery task
2) Primary tracking task + verbal imagery task
- In the 2nd visual tasks, participants had to imaging the letter E & classify the corners in the letter
RESULTS:
Participants 1 found it difficult to do both primary tracking & secondary visual task
Participants 2 found it easy to do primary tracking + verbal imagery task
CONCLUSION:
Condition 1 - the 2 tasks where competing for the same limited resources of VSS
Condition 2 - two different stores used (PL & VSS)
- this supports the limited capacity for VSS
Outline Baddeley, Thompson & Buchanan (1975) research into Phonological Loop.
PROCEDURE:
Lab experiment, repeated measure
Participants given visual presentations of word lists vs brief exposure & then asked to recall in serial order
1) List = 5 mono-syllabic English words e.g. cat, with, twice
2) List = polysyllabic English words e.g. university, organisation
- measure which condition led to better recall
RESULTS:
Over several trials participants recalled more short words than long words = word length effect
Participants able to recall as many words as they could articulate in 1.5 secs
- Longer words can’t be rehearsed because they don’t fit in the articulatory process
CONCLUSION:
PL capacity determined by the time taken to say words rather that number of items
Time est. = 1.5 secs
Why is the Central Executive considered vague?
Little research to support it
WMM doesn’t explain how or why it directs attention
Outline Bertz (1995) in terms of limitation of WMM.
WMM fails to consider musical memory so lacks validity
E.g. Bertz found that participants could listen to instrumental music (w/o words) without impairing performance on doing other acoustic tasks at the same time
What is a practical application of the WMM?
Aid dementia sufferers (where area of their brain dies)
They have difficulty doing dual tasks, Baddeley suggests there’s a fault w/ CE (so can’t process a lot of information)
To help? reduce information or slow down info