1/7
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
The crimean war
Russia raised a force of 700,000 in Crimea but couldn’t remove the French and British
War revealed weak army - made up of 1mil peasants through forced conscription - this and harsh punishment meant that peasants were reluctant to fight - led to army reform and emancipation
also revealed economic weakness - after war Russia spent 2bil roubles on railways - Russia had a lack of advanced weapons, money etc
(200,000 KM of track from
1861 to 1878)
led to the emancipation edict as it revealed Russia’s weakness compared to the west
autocracy remained but became more liberal through the reforms caused by th
The reforms were NOT due to the crimean war
pressure to equal with western powers
pressure as it was a form of slavery and seen as immoral
pressure from increasing uprisings
pressure from some liberal nobles, e.g Milyutin
Emancipation of the Serfs 1861 - did Alexander improve the lives of Russian Peasants
agree
over 2mil serfs freed, and they could also own their own land
disagree
peasants controlled by the mir - needed their permission to move, get married etc
had to pay a compensation of redemption dues for 49 years
only for 1/3 poor quality land even though they made up most of society
625 peasant revolts - shows they still aren’t happy
arguably he kept these restrictions to retain autocracy
To what extent did Alexander reform local structures of government
1864 zemstva decree - creation of local elected councils that dealt with things like healthcare - shows steps towards democracy as it was elected and peasants could participate
significant as it led to the 1870 creation of town Dumas
However - arguably only created because it was necessary after the emancipation - rather than him trying to be less autocratic
also unfair - dominated by nobility (45%) - meant it was easy for Alexander to control - autocracy
Alexander II as a reformer
military reform
1863 abolished harsh punishment
conscription time also reduced from 25years to 16
put liberal milyutin in charge
slightly effective as peasants were more motivated to fight, however - Russia still struggled to win the 1877 war against Turkey
Legal reform
1864 - salaries set high to avoid bribery
trials public and judges appointed by the Tsar
more fair for peasants
nature of Alexander II’s gov
committee of ministers that each had responsibilities for a separate Russian affair, e.g education, war, finance
however - they rarely consulted each other so their policies conflicted - abolished in 1906 by the PG
the third section = Alexander II’s secret police - used to investigate and imprison opponents - 150,000 were exiled to Siberia
national minorities
1863 polish rebellion - desire for freedom and rebelling against Wielopolski who campaigned for partial independence
crushed by Russian army - polish nobility exiled to Siberia
Tsar imposed reforms - Russian taught in schools etc - showed start of Russification process
strict on Jews - mainly outcasted to the pale of settlement - but some were allowed to live outside it if they were a doctor etc
Finns originally allowed a Finnish parliament but then it was fully integrated in to Russian empire
opposition
intelligentsia - believed Russia was backwards compared to the West
disagreed with autocratic values
land and liberty formed but split into two:
non violent black partition
violent people’s will - they go on to assassinate the tsar