1/19
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Anselm
creator of the ontological argument
the type of argument of the ontological argument
a priori
a priori argument
arguments gained through reasoning, and not our senses and experience
What the ontological argument is NOT trying to do
Prove God. It is demonstrating what is already true
quote from the bible the ontological argument is based off
“Fools say in their heart “There is no God””
Anselm’s first premise
God is that which nothing greater can be conceived
Anselm's second premise
God may exist only in the mind, or in reality as well
Anselm’s third premise
Something that exists in the mind and reality is greater than something that just exists in the mind
Anselm’s conclusion
God must exist in reality and the mind
what Anselm considered the atheist view
reduction to the absurd
What Anselm considered existence
A predicate
a predicate
a description or attribute that tells us something about the subject
the biggest critic of Anselm
Gaunilo
Gaunilo’s first criticism against existence as a predicate
Gossip can make you make you think things that only exist in the mind
Gaunilo’s second criticism against existence as a predicate
You cannot define things into existence just by having an idea about it
Gaunilo’s biggest criticism against existence as a predicate
If I had the idea of the greatest island, and then followed Anselm’s logic, I would be saying I had proof of a non existent island
Anselm’s response to Gaunilo’s criticism
God is THE perfect thing, the island has no intrinsic maximum
Kant’s criticism of Anselm
Existence is not a predicate
Descartes defense of Anselm
You cannot have a triangle without 3 sides. You also cannot have God who does not exist. They are both illogical.