1/52
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Non-fatal offences
There are 5 general non-fatal offences against the person:
GBH with intent
GBH
ABH
Assault
Battery
Common Assault
Common assault is the lowest level of offence against the person. There are 2 types (Assault and battery) The prosecution will choose which of the two offences is the most real event depending on the facts of the case. They are not defined in an act of parliament but it is stated in Section 39 Criminal justice act 1988 that they are summary offences and carry a maximum sentence of 6 months.
Assault definition
An assault is any act (and not mere omission to an act) by which a person intentionally or recklessly causes another to suffer or apprehend immediate unlawful violence.
Actus Reus of Assault
An act which causes the victim to apprehend the application of immediate unlawful force
An Act
Constanza (words are sufficient)
Bursto (silence can amount to an assault)
Tuberville v savage (words can negate an assault)
Light (words will not cancel assault if the V still apprehends the immediate unalawful force)
R v Constanza
words are sufficient
Tuberville v savage
words can negate an assault
R v light
words will not cancel assault if the V still apprehends the immediate unalawful force
R v Bursto
silence can amount to an assault
Causes the V to apprehend
If the v does not apprehend immediate force it will not constitute an assault. (Lamb) The v does not actually have to fear violence, and the word ‘apprehend’ equally means anticipating violence.
R v Lamb
If the v does not apprehend immediate force it will not constitute an assault.
Application of immediate
The law takes a liberal interpretation of the term ‘immediate’. London ruled that immediacy will be proved if the conduct of the D caused the V to apprehend the possibility of an immediate attack or an attack that would be imminent. Such fear doesn’t have to be rational in the panic of the moment but to must be genuinely held.
Unlawful force
The v doesn’t have to apprehend any injury, pain or harm to meet this last element of the AR. An assault can be committed even where the ‘force’ apprehended is mere touch, provided if touch is unwanted
MR of Assault
Intention to cause V to apprehend immediate unlawful force or recklessness
Battery
A battery is committed where a person internationally ne recklessly applies unlawful force to another
AR of battery
The application of unlawful physical force to another person
Types of battery
direct
indirect
Direct Battery
Direct application of force, where the D actually touches the V
Collins v Willcock - any touching of another however slight may amount to a battery
Thomas - If the contact exceeds what is generally held acceptable then the AR might still be established
Collins V willcock - If physical contact which is an every day occurs ce it is likely to be excluded
Collins v Willcock
Any touching of another however slight may amount to a battery
If physical contact which is an every day occurs it is likely to be excluded
R v Thomas
If the contact exceeds what is generally held acceptable then the AR might still be established
Indirect battery
The person applying the force does not have to come into direct contract with the V. Most of the time force will be applied from one person to another. However, it has long been established that they can be indirect (Martian) this principle was further established in Kay and Haysted. A battery can be committed by an omission when there is a duty to act in a dangerous situation (santa-bermuda)
R v Martin
The person applying the force does not have to come into direct contract with the V. Most of the time force will be applied from one person to another. However, it has long been established that they can be indirect
R v santa-bermuda
A battery can be committed by an omission when there is a duty to act in a dangerous situation
MR of battery
Intention o apply unlawful force or recklessly
It was established that in vienna that the intention or recklessness is only required for the act of physical contact itself, and not in respect of harm that might arise from such contact
Actual Bodily Harm
Section 47 Offences against the person act 1861
Triable either way offence
Max sentence of 5 years
ABH definition
An assault or battery which causes the V actual bodily harm. The D intends or is reckless as to weather the V fars unlawful force or it is subjected to unlawful force
AR of ABH
Assault or battery that results in actual bodily harm
It must be proven that the D committed an assault or battery first, that is what causes the ABH
AR - Actual bodily harm
Any hurt that interferes with the health of the individual (injury) r v miller
ABH is not limited t skin, flesh and bones DPP v smith
R v Miller
Any hurt that interferes with the health of the individual
DPP v smith
ABH is not limited to skin flesh and bones
MR of ABH
The intention or recklessness as the the assault or battery. You do not need to foresee the injury R v savage
R v savage
you do not need to foresee the injury
GBH (section 20)
Section 20 offences against the person act 1861
triable either way offence
5 years max sentence
AR of GBH s20
Either unlawfully wounding or unlawfully inflicting GBH
Wounding
Both layers of the skin are broken and there is usually blood (Eisenhower)
A broken bone wouldn’t constitute a wound (R V wood)
R v Eisenhower
Both layers of the skin are broken and there is usually blood
R v Wood
A broken bone wouldn’t constitute a wound
GBH
really serious harm (R v saunders)
physical injuries ( R v saunders)
Age ( R v Bollom)
multiple minor injuries ( R v brown and stratton)
Biologically - STDs ( R v Dica )
R v saunders
really serious harm and physical injuries
R v Bollom
Age
R v brown and stratton
multiple minor injuries
R v Dica
Biologically - STDs
MR of GBH s20
The intention to cause another some harm or recklessness as to causing some harm
Do not need to foresee GBH ( R v Mowatt) but must foresee some harm ( R v Parmenter)
GBH section 18
Section 18 offences against the person act 1861
Indictable offence
Max penalty of a life sentence
Specific intent only
AR of S18 GBH
Unlawfully wounding or Unlawfully inflicting GBH
MR of S18 GBH
Intention to cause GBH or resist arrest
Intention (s20)
Direct intention - The aim to bring about that consequence ( R v Mohan)
Indirect intention - the consequence is not desired but occurs as a result
R v Mohan
The aim to bring about that consequence
GBH (s20 MR)
Serious harm (R v Taylor)
R v Taylor
serious harm
Resist arrest
level of intention to cause injury is lower ( R v Morrison)
R v Morrison
Level of intention to cause injury is lower
Evaluation points
outdated
general structure
sentence
language
Actus reus
Mens rea