Non-fatal offences

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 1 person
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/52

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

53 Terms

1
New cards

Non-fatal offences

There are 5 general non-fatal offences against the person:

  • GBH with intent

  • GBH

  • ABH

  • Assault

  • Battery

2
New cards

Common Assault

Common assault is the lowest level of offence against the person. There are 2 types (Assault and battery) The prosecution will choose which of the two offences is the most real event depending on the facts of the case. They are not defined in an act of parliament but it is stated in Section 39 Criminal justice act 1988 that they are summary offences and carry a maximum sentence of 6 months.

3
New cards

Assault definition

An assault is any act (and not mere omission to an act) by which a person intentionally or recklessly causes another to suffer or apprehend immediate unlawful violence.

4
New cards

Actus Reus of Assault

An act which causes the victim to apprehend the application of immediate unlawful force

5
New cards

An Act

  • Constanza (words are sufficient)

  • Bursto (silence can amount to an assault)

  • Tuberville v savage (words can negate an assault)

  • Light (words will not cancel assault if the V still apprehends the immediate unalawful force)

6
New cards

R v Constanza

words are sufficient

7
New cards

Tuberville v savage

words can negate an assault

8
New cards

R v light

words will not cancel assault if the V still apprehends the immediate unalawful force

9
New cards

R v Bursto

silence can amount to an assault

10
New cards

Causes the V to apprehend

If the v does not apprehend immediate force it will not constitute an assault. (Lamb) The v does not actually have to fear violence, and the word ‘apprehend’ equally means anticipating violence.

11
New cards

R v Lamb

If the v does not apprehend immediate force it will not constitute an assault.

12
New cards

Application of immediate

The law takes a liberal interpretation of the term ‘immediate’. London ruled that immediacy will be proved if the conduct of the D caused the V to apprehend the possibility of an immediate attack or an attack that would be imminent. Such fear doesn’t have to be rational in the panic of the moment but to must be genuinely held.

13
New cards

Unlawful force

The v doesn’t have to apprehend any injury, pain or harm to meet this last element of the AR. An assault can be committed even where the ‘force’ apprehended is mere touch, provided if touch is unwanted

14
New cards

MR of Assault

Intention to cause V to apprehend immediate unlawful force or recklessness

15
New cards

Battery

A battery is committed where a person internationally ne recklessly applies unlawful force to another

16
New cards

AR of battery

The application of unlawful physical force to another person

17
New cards

Types of battery

  • direct

  • indirect

18
New cards

Direct Battery

Direct application of force, where the D actually touches the V

  • Collins v Willcock - any touching of another however slight may amount to a battery

  • Thomas - If the contact exceeds what is generally held acceptable then the AR might still be established

  • Collins V willcock - If physical contact which is an every day occurs ce it is likely to be excluded

19
New cards

Collins v Willcock

  • Any touching of another however slight may amount to a battery

  • If physical contact which is an every day occurs it is likely to be excluded

20
New cards

R v Thomas

If the contact exceeds what is generally held acceptable then the AR might still be established

21
New cards

Indirect battery

The person applying the force does not have to come into direct contract with the V. Most of the time force will be applied from one person to another. However, it has long been established that they can be indirect (Martian) this principle was further established in Kay and Haysted. A battery can be committed by an omission when there is a duty to act in a dangerous situation (santa-bermuda)

22
New cards

R v Martin

The person applying the force does not have to come into direct contract with the V. Most of the time force will be applied from one person to another. However, it has long been established that they can be indirect

23
New cards

R v santa-bermuda

A battery can be committed by an omission when there is a duty to act in a dangerous situation

24
New cards

MR of battery

Intention o apply unlawful force or recklessly

It was established that in vienna that the intention or recklessness is only required for the act of physical contact itself, and not in respect of harm that might arise from such contact

25
New cards

Actual Bodily Harm

Section 47 Offences against the person act 1861

Triable either way offence

Max sentence of 5 years

26
New cards

ABH definition

An assault or battery which causes the V actual bodily harm. The D intends or is reckless as to weather the V fars unlawful force or it is subjected to unlawful force

27
New cards

AR of ABH

Assault or battery that results in actual bodily harm

  • It must be proven that the D committed an assault or battery first, that is what causes the ABH

28
New cards

AR - Actual bodily harm

Any hurt that interferes with the health of the individual (injury) r v miller

ABH is not limited t skin, flesh and bones DPP v smith

29
New cards

R v Miller

Any hurt that interferes with the health of the individual

30
New cards

DPP v smith

ABH is not limited to skin flesh and bones

31
New cards

MR of ABH

The intention or recklessness as the the assault or battery. You do not need to foresee the injury R v savage

32
New cards

R v savage

you do not need to foresee the injury

33
New cards

GBH (section 20)

Section 20 offences against the person act 1861

triable either way offence

5 years max sentence

34
New cards

AR of GBH s20

Either unlawfully wounding or unlawfully inflicting GBH

35
New cards

Wounding

  • Both layers of the skin are broken and there is usually blood (Eisenhower)

  • A broken bone wouldn’t constitute a wound (R V wood)

36
New cards

R v Eisenhower

Both layers of the skin are broken and there is usually blood

37
New cards

R v Wood

A broken bone wouldn’t constitute a wound

38
New cards

GBH

  • really serious harm (R v saunders)

  • physical injuries ( R v saunders)

  • Age ( R v Bollom)

  • multiple minor injuries ( R v brown and stratton)

  • Biologically - STDs ( R v Dica )

39
New cards

R v saunders

really serious harm and physical injuries

40
New cards

R v Bollom

Age

41
New cards

R v brown and stratton

multiple minor injuries

42
New cards

R v Dica

Biologically - STDs

43
New cards

MR of GBH s20

The intention to cause another some harm or recklessness as to causing some harm

  • Do not need to foresee GBH ( R v Mowatt) but must foresee some harm ( R v Parmenter)

44
New cards

GBH section 18

Section 18 offences against the person act 1861

Indictable offence

Max penalty of a life sentence

Specific intent only

45
New cards

AR of S18 GBH

Unlawfully wounding or Unlawfully inflicting GBH

46
New cards

MR of S18 GBH

Intention to cause GBH or resist arrest

47
New cards

Intention (s20)

Direct intention - The aim to bring about that consequence ( R v Mohan)

Indirect intention - the consequence is not desired but occurs as a result

48
New cards

R v Mohan

The aim to bring about that consequence

49
New cards

GBH (s20 MR)

Serious harm (R v Taylor)

50
New cards

R v Taylor

serious harm

51
New cards

Resist arrest

level of intention to cause injury is lower ( R v Morrison)

52
New cards

R v Morrison

Level of intention to cause injury is lower

53
New cards

Evaluation points

  • outdated

  • general structure

  • sentence

  • language

  • Actus reus

  • Mens rea