Fichas de aprendizaje AP Lang Final Study Guide | Quizlet

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/23

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

24 Terms

1
New cards

What are the 6 types of evidence for an argument essay

Fictional, Nonfictional, Current, Historical, Class concepts, and Personal experience.

2
New cards

What are the two ways to earn commentary points in an argument essay?

Warrants and ethical and political Implications

3
New cards

What is a warrant

Show the logical connection between data and thesis

4
New cards

What are the two types of implications that can be used in an argument essay?

-Ethical Implications: Morality; Who is harmed?
-Political Implications: Power; Who benefits?

5
New cards

What are the 3 effects of simple syntax?

Childish, Sad/Angry, and Dramatic.

6
New cards

What are the 2 effects of complex syntax?

Vivid Imagery and Complex Ideas

7
New cards

What are the 6 moral theories?

Utilitarianism, Moral Imperative, Pragmatism, The original position/ Veil of ignorance, Altruism, and Ethical egoism.

8
New cards

-Greatest good for the greatest number
-"Maximize the good"
-Teleological or "ends based" ethics

Utilitarianism

9
New cards

-Act only according to that maxim that should be universal law.
-Deontological (duty-based ethics)
-The ends don't justify the means!
-Objection: Can result in tragic ends.
-Sometimes the ends do justify the means.
-(Nazis at the door)

Moral imperative

10
New cards

-Consequentialist - Outcomes matter, not intentions.
-What is true or good is what works
-Aligns ethics with science
-Real and True are functional labels for inquiry only - no metaphysical reality

Pragmatism

11
New cards

-Principle of Justice as Fairness
-Ignore your own interests and desires
-Pretend that you do not know who you are in a given dilemma; which decision is most fair?

The original position/ veil of ignorance

12
New cards

-Unselfish devotion to others
-Help others with no
-expectation of reward
-Be willing to sacrifice own self-interest
-Morally right action is that which is best for everyone else, not yourself
-"Live for Others" -Auguste Comte

Altruism

13
New cards

-Empathy is Weakness
-Survival of the Fittest
-Philanthropy is Irrational
-Laissez-Faire Capitalism and Free Markets are good
-Tends toward Narcissism

Ethical egoism

14
New cards

What are the 6 parts of the Toulmin model?

Claim, Qualifier, Data (evidence), credentials, Warrant, and Backing

15
New cards

Claim

16
New cards

What are the 3 types of claims?

Policy, Fact, and Value

17
New cards

Something should (or should
not) be done.

Policy claim

18
New cards

Something is or is not real or true
Something is defined a certain way
Something causes something else

Fact Claim

19
New cards

Something is or is not good or desirable

Value claim

20
New cards

Characteristics of the data that make it
reliable, trustworthy, and/or valid.
Expertise (PhD) or Authority
Past Experience
Scientific Methodology
Triangulation with other Data
Physical or Empirical Evidence

Qualifier

21
New cards

Characteristics of the data that make it
reliable, trustworthy, and/or valid.
Expertise (PhD) or Authority
Past Experience
Scientific Methodology
Triangulation with other Data
Physical or Empirical Evidence

Data (evidence)

22
New cards

Characteristics of the data that make it
reliable, trustworthy, and/or valid.
Expertise (PhD) or Authority
Past Experience
Scientific Methodology
Triangulation with other Data
Physical or Empirical Evidence

Credentials

23
New cards

The reasoning which connects the
evidence to the claim.
Warrants are often assumed or
implied rather than stated explicitly.
Shows a logical connection between
the claim and the evidence.

Warrant

24
New cards

Support for the warrant.
Bolsters the connection and makes
the argument stronger.
Based on the values or beliefs that
underlie the warrant.

Backing