Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Psychophysics
the science of defining quantitative relationships between physical and psychological (subjective) events
ex. controlling a physical stimuli, then measuring how a person responds/fails to respond
Method of constant stimuli
measures absolute threshold
test many stimuli of different intensities, to find out what the smallest intensity that can be detected is
Threshold's in other fields are often all or none (you either hear something or don't), this is NOT how we measure in psychophysics
Does not mean that the stimuli is constantly present — much of the stimuli is either well above or below the threshold
Method of limits
vary the magnitude/intensity of a stimulus (or difference between two) until participant notices, experimenter adjusts stimuli and samples a scale
Reality of threshold testing —threshold is the point at which you detect it 50% of the time since there are no such "perfect conditions"
Graphed as a **Tan** function
Method of adjustments
let participant (rather than experimenter) adjust a stimulus until it matches a target (i.e color matching)
an average threshold of detecting a change between participants
Data is rarely straightforward — there is no such thing as "perfect conditions"
Scales
measuring the strength of the sensation rather than the threshold of detection
**Not all sensations have the same scale or strength**
Magnitude estimation
measures scale
giving participants a sensation and have them rate its strength
freeform or give a starting baseline (baseline is probably more successful)
I.e. how blue or green is this, 1 = very blue, 10 = very green
steven's power law
S = sensation
I = intensity
b = exponent tied to stimulus type
a = constant adjusted to put different scales on the same axis (i.e. adjusting for inches versus centimeters
*** Sensations have different scales ***
Signal detection
ability to detect a signal amongst noise
accounts for the amount of noise, the discriminability of the signal, and biases in the person's response patterns
I.e. walking to class in the cold, have a phone in pocket— need to take off gloves and be extra cold. with all of your snow stuff on, it's hard to tell when your phone vibrates over the sound of your gear jostling
Noise
internal — the static in your nervous system that interferes with your ability to detect a signal
external — the stimuli surrounding the target signal that interferes with your ability to detect it
Generally drawn as a normal distribution — can be narrow or wider
Criterion
threshold of deciding whether or not you detect a signal
can shift along x-axis — moves towards origin when you are anticipating the signal
when moving further down the x-axis — better be sure that the signal is present (minimizes false alarms)
Can shift reflexively on bias
Hit
signal existed and you detected it
Correct rejection
no signal — was not detected
False alarm
no signal but incorrectly detected it
Miss
signal existed — but was not detected
Sensitivity
results from signal detection are shifted by this
I.e. how discriminable the target is from the noise
Difference between peaks of signal and situational noise; the larger the difference — the better at distinguishing
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves
Demonstrate both sensitivity and criterion in one line
Plots Hits versus False Alarms (both Yes responses)
greater sensitivity = curve moves closer to top left corner
Criterion — represented by a point on the curve
Transduction
translation process
all sensory organs take physical stimuli and convert them to electrical/biochemical signals in our nervous system
the way this occurs is unique to each system but the core tenets are the same
Cellular/Neuronal Neuroscience
From external to internal physics/biochem
The way transduction occurs is unique to each system but the core tenets are the same
Afferent
towards the brain
sensory
Efferent
away from the brain
motor
Systems Neuroscience
Different sensory cortices process different information
**McGurk effect states that just because they are different doesn't mean they never interact
EEG
direct measure of electrical activity of large populations of neurons
assesses event-related potentials
good temporal resolution
poor spatial resolution
MRI (structural)
measures shift in magnetic fields to assess atomic structure
indirect measure
good spatial resolution
poor temporal resolution
fMRI
indirect measure
tracks blood oxygen level-dependent signal
(BOLD)
PET
similar resolution to fMRI
based on metabolism of radiotracer in brain cells
MEG
between EEG and fMRI
measures changes in magnetic activity across large populations of neurons in the brain
good temporal and spatial resolution (for the surface of the brain)