How does a historian work?(RE)

5.0(1)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/9

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

10 Terms

1
New cards

What is evidence in the context of history?

Evidence is proof that something is true and can be an object, document, or book from a historical event.

2
New cards

What is a primary source?

A primary source is a kind of evidence created by people who saw or were part of an event, such as letters, diaries, tools, and clothing.

3
New cards

Give examples of primary sources.

Examples of primary sources include letters, diaries, tools, and clothing.

4
New cards

What is a secondary source?

A secondary source is created after an event by someone who was not part of the event, like textbooks and encyclopedias.

5
New cards

How do historians analyze their sources?

Historians analyze their sources by looking for reasons the source was created and deciding if it's reliable regarding its facts.

6
New cards

What is bias in historical sources?

Bias is a judgment based only on feelings, which means that sources with bias cannot always be trusted to be factual or true.

7
New cards

What steps do historians take to make an inference?

Historians study primary sources, review secondary sources, think about different points of view, and then make an inference to explain what happened.

8
New cards

Why is it important for historians to read articles in scholarly journals?

It's important because scholarly journals are reviewed by other historians to ensure facts are correct and to discuss different interpretations.

9
New cards

What is a conclusion in the context of historical analysis?

A conclusion is a final decision reached by reasoning, similar to an inference, based on facts and evidence from sources.

10
New cards

Why might historians disagree about conclusions regarding historical events?

Historians might disagree because they interpret evidence differently or prioritize different facts, leading to varying conclusions.