What Is the Evidence?
Historians look at evidence to find out about the past. Evidence
is proof that something is true. Evidence might be an object, such
as a soldier’s uniform or a scrap of pottery. Evidence might also
be a document or book that was written during a historical event.
A primary source is a kind of evidence. Primary sources are
created by people who saw or were part of an event. Letters and
diaries are primary sources. Tools and clothing are also primary
sources. Historians use primary sources to learn what people
were thinking at the time of the event. Primary sources can help
historians explain events that happened long ago.
A secondary source is also evidence. Secondary sources are
created after an event. They are created by people who were not
part of the event. Your history textbook is a secondary source.
Encyclopedias are also secondary sources. Secondary sources
can give a broad view of historical events or people. However,
new information can only come from primary sources.
Historians analyze the information in their sources. They look
for reasons that the source was created. Then historians decide if
the source is reliable when it comes to its facts. Each source was
written with a particular point of view, or attitude about people or
life. The author of a source uses his or her point of view to decide
what to include in the document. Sometimes a point of view is
based on feelings and not on facts. A judgment based only on
feelings is called a bias. Sources with a bias cannot always be
trusted to be factual or true.
Sources That Historians Use
Primary Sources Secondary Sources
• Written at the time of the
event
• Eyewitness to history
• Reliable source for
historians
• Includes letters, diaries,
tools, clothing
• Written after an event
• Author did not witness the
event
• Contains facts about an
event
• Includes textbooks and
encyclopedias
Lesson 2 How Does a Historian Work?, Continued
Glue Foldable here
7
Copyright by McGraw-Hill Education.
What Does a Historian Do?
NAME_________________________________________ DATE _____________ CLASS _______
Paraphrasing
3. In your own words,
explain how to make
an inference.
Marking
the Text
4. Underline the text that
explains what a
scholarly journal is.
Explaining
5. Explain why it is
important for historians
to read articles in
scholarly journals.
Writing About History
Historians interpret information from primary sources to make
inferences. Making an inference means choosing the most likely
explanation for the facts. Sometimes the inference is simple.
When you see someone with a wet umbrella, you can make the
inference that it is raining. Making inferences about historical
events is not so easy.
To make an inference, historians start with primary sources.
They use sources they already know are trustworthy. Next, they
read secondary sources. They think about the different points of
view. Finally, they make an inference to explain what happened.
Many historians write articles about their inferences. Most
articles are published in scholarly journals, or magazines.
Scholarly magazines are concerned with learning. Usually, other
historians read the articles to make sure the facts are correct.
They decide whether they agree with the inferences in the
article. Historians must be careful to make inferences based on
facts. They do not want to show a bias in their writing.
How Historians Make Inferences
Study primary
sources
Review secondary
sources
Think about
different points
of view
Make an
inference to
explain what
happened
Historians can write and review scholarly articles because they
become experts on a historical subject. They focus their
research. Some historians focus on a very narrow area of study.
Someone might study a particular historical person, such as
Queen Elizabeth I of England. Someone else studying the past
might focus on the events of a single place and time.
Other historians may have a very broad focus. For example,
they may study the economic history of many places in a certain
period of time. Others may study the history of an idea, such as
medicine or technology.
Lesson 2 How Does a Historian Work?, Continued
8
Copyright by McGraw-Hill Education.
What Does a Historian Do?
NAME_________________________________________ DATE _____________ CLASS _______
Marking
the Text
6. Underline the
definition of
conclusion.
Reading
Check
7. Why do historians
draw different
conclusions about
events of the past?
8. Place a one-tab
Foldable along the
dotted line. Label the
anchor tab Historians.
Label the Foldable
Evidence, Inferences,
and Conclusions.
Make a memory map
by drawing three
arrows below the title
and writing three words
or phrases that you
remember about
historians and their
work. Use your memory
notes to help you
complete the activity
under the tab.
Lesson 2 How Does a Historian Work?, Continued
A conclusion is a final decision that is reached by reasoning.
It is like an inference. Historians draw conclusions about events
of the past. They look for facts and evidence in their sources.
Then, they use reasoning to draw a conclusion.
Sometimes historians disagree in their conclusions. For
example, some historians say that Genghis Khan was a brutal
warrior. They tell how he would destroy cities and kill people
when he came to a new land. Other historians disagree. They say
that Genghis Khan was a good ruler. His empire had a time of
peace. Traders were safe to trade goods. People were protected
by good laws.
Which conclusion is correct? Was Genghis Khan a cruel warrior
or a good leader? A historian may use evidence to explain his or
her conclusions. If both conclusions are supported by evidence,
they both can be correct.
Examine primary sources.
Use already-known facts.
Read secondary sources.
Use facts to make an inference or draw
a conclusion.
Write article about inference or conclusion.
Check for Understanding
Explain how historians use different sources to draw
conclusions.
1.
How are a person's point of view and bias related?