1/53
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Offender Profiling
an investigative tool used to narrow down the list of likely suspects
Offender Profiling Approaches
top down approach
bottom up approach
Top-Down Approach
the American Approach
Organised Offenders
Disorganised Offenders
Constructing an FBI profile
The American Approach
the top down approach originated in the US
the FBI drew upon data from in depth interviews of criminals and concluded data could be organised into organised or disorganised crimes
each category had certain characteristics which would help find the offender
offender profilers who use the top down method will collect data about a murder and then decide the category that fits best
Organised Offenders
show evidence of having planned the crime in advance
the victim is deliberately targeted
the offender maintains a high degree of control during the crime and detached surgical precision
there is little evidence or clues left behind
tend to be above average intelligence, in a skilled professional occupation, and socially and sexually competent
Disorganised Offenders
show little evidence of planning suggesting their offences may be spontaneous acts
crime scene tends to reflect the impulsive nature of the attack - body still present and little control
tend to have lower than average IQ, be in unskilled work or unemployed, and have a history of sexual dysfunction and failed relationships
Constructing an FBI Profile
data assimilation = the profiler reviews the evidence
crime scene classification = as either organised or disorganised
crime reconstruction = hypotheses in terms of sequence of events, behaviour of victim etc.
profile generation = hypotheses related to the likely offender
Offender Profiling - Top Down Approach AO3
Offender Profiling - Top Down Approach (AO3):
Offender Profiling - Top Down Approach (AO3):
Offender Profiling - Top Down Approach (AO3):
Bottom Up Approach
the aim is to generate a picture of the offender - their likely characteristics, routine behaviour and social background - through systematic analysis of evidence at the crime scene
investigative psychology
geographical profiling
Investigative Psychology
this is an attempt to apply statistical procedures and psychological theory to the analysis of crime scene evidence
the aim is to establish patterns of behaviour that are likely to occur across crime scenes
this is to develop a statistical database which then acts as a baseline for comparison
specific details of an offence can be matched against this database to reveal important details about the offender
interpersonal coherence = the way an offender behaves at the scene and with the victim may reflect behaviour in everyday life
key variables also include time and place, geographical profiling
forensic awareness = describes those individuals who have been subject of police interrogation before - their behaviour may denoted how mindful they are of covering their tracks
Geographical Profiling
uses information about the location of linked crime scenes to make inferences about the likely home or operation base of an offender
this is known as crime mapping and is based on the principle of spatial consistency
it can be used with psychology therapy to creates hypotheses about how the offender is thinking and their modus operandi
the assumption is that serial offenders with restrict their work to geographical areas they are familiar either
understanding the spatial pattern of their behaviour provides investigators with a centre of gravity which is likely to include the offenders base
this is the basis of the Canter’s circle theory
Canter’s Circle Theory
the pattern of offending forms a circle around the offender’s home base
the distribution of offences leads us to describe an offender in 2 ways
marauder = who operates in close proximity to their home base
commuter = who is likely to have trvelled a distance away from their usual residence
such spatial decision making can offer the investigators insight into the nature of the offence
Offender Profiling - Bottom Up Approach AO3
Offender Profiling - Bottom Up Approach (AO3):
Offender Profiling - Bottom Up Approach (AO3):
Offender Profiling - Bottom Up Approach (AO3):
Biological Explanation
a historically approach
genetic and neural
Historical Approach
Lombroso’s theory of the atavistic form suggested that criminals were a primitive subspecies who were biologically different from non criminals
biological approach
atavistic form
offender types
lombroso’s research
Biological Approach
Lombroso saw offenders as lacking evolutionary development who would find it impossible to adjust to the demands of a civilised society and inevitably turn to crime
saw offending behaviour as a natural tendency, rooted in genes
therefore, offending behaviour is innate and the offender cannot be blamed for their actions
Atavistic Form
argued that offender subtype could be identified as being in possession of physiological markers that were linked to types of offence
these are biologically determined atavistic characteristics, mainly features of face and head that make offenders physically different from the rest of us
the atavistic form of the skull included a narrow, prominent jaw, high cheekbones, facial asymmetry, dark skin, extra toes
other aspects include insensitivity to pain, use of slang, tattoos
Offender Types
categorised in terms of physical and facial characteristics
murders were described as having bloodshot eyes, curly hair, long ears
sexual deviants had glinting eyes, swollen, fleshy lips, projecting ears
Lombroso’s Research
examined the skulls of 383 dead convicts and 3839 living convicts and concluded that 40% of criminal acts are committed by people with atavistic characteristics
Biological Explanations: Historical Approach AO3
Biological Explanations: Historical Approach (AO3):
Biological Explanations: Historical Approach (AO3):
Biological Explanations: Historical Approach (AO3):
Genetic Explanation
twin studies
adoption studies
candidate genes
diathesis stress model
Twin Studies
Christiansen (1977) studied the concordance rate for offending behaviour in over 3500 twin pairs in Denmark
for identical twins a 35% concordance rate was found
for non identical twins a 13% concordance rate was found
this indicates that it is not just the behaviour that might be inherited but the underlying predisposing trait
Adoption Studies
Crowe (1972) found that adopted children with a biological mother with a criminal record had a 50% risk of having criminal record by the age of 18
adopted children with a mother without a criminal record had only a 5% risk showing genetics is significant
Psychological Explanations
eysenck’s theory
cognitive
Esenck’s Theory of Criminal Personality
personality theory
biological basis
criminal personality
role of socialisation
measuring criminal personality
Personality Theory
Eysenck (1947) proposed that behaviour could be represented alone 3 dimensions
introversion-extraversion (E)
neuroticism-stability (N)
psychotism-sociability
these dimensions combine to form a variety of personality characteristics
Biological Basis
Eysenck said our personality traits/types have an innate biological basis
extraverts
have an underactive nervous system
this means they constantly seek excitement, stimulation and are likkey to engage in risk taking behaviour
thye tend not to conditin easily and do not learn from thei mistakes
neurotic
individuals have a high level of reactivity in the sympathetic nervous system
they respond quickly to situations of threste
this means they tend to be nervous, jumpy and overanxious, and their general instability means their behaviour is often difficult to predict
psychotic
individuals are suggested to have higher levels of testosterone and are unemotional and prone to aggression
Criminal Personality
the criminal personality type is a neurotic-extravert-psychotic
neurotics are unstable and prone to overreact to situations of threat
extraverts seek more arousal and engage in dangerous activities
psychotics are aggressive and lack empathy
Role of Socialisation
Eysenck saw offending behaviour is developmentally immature in that it is selfish and concerned with immediate gratification - offenders are impatient
the process of socialisation is one in which children are taught to become more able to delay gratification and more socially oriented
Eysenck believed that people with high E and N scores had nervous systems that made then difficult to condition
as a result, they are less likely to learn anxiety responses to antisocial impulses and they would be more likely to act antisocially in situations where the opportunity presented itself
Measuring the Criminal Personality
Eysenck developed the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire
a form of psychological test which locates respondents along the E, N and P dimensions to determine their personality type
Psychological Explanations: Eysenck’ Theory AO3
Psychological Explanations: Eysenck’ Theory (AO3):
Psychological Explanations: Eysenck’ Theory (AO3):
Psychological Explanations: Eysenck’ Theory (AO3):
Cognitive
level of moral reasoning
cognitive distortions
Level of Moral Reasoning
moral development
link with criminality
Moral Development
Kohlberg (1968) proposed that people’s decisions snd judgements on issues of right and wrong can be summarise in a stage theory of moral reasoning
the higher the stage, the more sophisticated the reasoning
Kohlberg (1973) using moral dilemmas, found a group of violent youths had lower levels of moral development that non violent youths
Link with Criminality
non offenders generally progress to conventional level
offenders are more likely to be classified at the pre-conventional level
characterised by a need to avoid punishment, gain rewards and childlike reasoning
so they may commit a crime if they can get away with it or gain rewards
offenders are often more egocentric and display poorer social perspective taking skills
Cognitive Distortions
these are faulty, biased and irrational ways of thinking that mean we perceive things inaccurately
hostile attribution bias
minimalisation
Hostile Attribution Bias
suggests that a propensity for violence is often associated with a tendency to misinterpret the actions of people
offenders may misread non aggressive cues triggering a disproportionate response
Schönenberg and Jusyte (2014) presented 55 violent offenders with images of emotionally ambiguous facial expressions
when compared with non aggressive control group, violent offenders were more likely to perceive the images as angry and hostille
the roots of this behaviour may be in childhood
Dodge and Frame (q982) showed children a video of an ambiguous provocation
children who had been identified as aggressive and rejected prior to the study interpreted the situation as hostile
Minimalisation
an attempt to deny the seriousness of an offence - an application of a euphemistic label for behaviour
studies suggest that individuals who commit sexual offences are prone to minimalisation
Barbaree (1991) found among 26 incarcerated rapists, 54% denied they had committed an offence at all and 40% minimised the harm they had caused
Psychological Explanations: Cognitive AO3
Psychological Explanations: Cognitive (AO3):
Psychological Explanations: Cognitive (AO3):
Psychological Explanations: Cognitive (AO3):