1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Definition
An unlawful interference with a person’s use of or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it
Who can claim?
Usually concerns neighbours, must have a legal interest in the land - Hunter v Canary Wharf
‘Unlawful’
Means unreasonable, not actually unlawful
What amounts to harm?
Direct harm - prima facie case - things such as roots or trees
Indirect harm - things such as noise (Coventry v Lawrence), smell (Adams v Ursell), and fumes
Risk factors for nuisance
Duration of interference - Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton Fireworks
Sensitivity of claimant - Network Rail Infrastructure v Morriss
Locality - Sturges v Bridges - “What would be a nuisance in Belgrave Square would not necessarily be so in Bermondsey”
Malice - Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett
Social benefit - Miller v Jackson
Who can be sued?
Person who caused nuisance or their successors in title - Bybrook v Kent County Council
The person who is causing, or allowing, the nuisance - Tetley v Chitty
If the occupier ‘adopted’ the nuisance - Sedleigh Denfield v O’Callaghan
When the nuisance is caused by natural causes, of which D was aware of and failed to deal with - Leaky v National Trust
Defences
Prescription - Sturges v Bridgeman - if the nuisance has gone on for over 20 years and C made no complaint in that time
Statutory authority - Allen v Gulf Oil Refining