Private Nuisance

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/6

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

7 Terms

1
New cards

Definition

An unlawful interference with a person’s use of or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it

2
New cards

Who can claim?

Usually concerns neighbours, must have a legal interest in the land - Hunter v Canary Wharf

3
New cards

‘Unlawful’

Means unreasonable, not actually unlawful

4
New cards

What amounts to harm?

Direct harm - prima facie case - things such as roots or trees

Indirect harm - things such as noise (Coventry v Lawrence), smell (Adams v Ursell), and fumes

5
New cards

Risk factors for nuisance

Duration of interference - Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton Fireworks

Sensitivity of claimant - Network Rail Infrastructure v Morriss

Locality - Sturges v Bridges - “What would be a nuisance in Belgrave Square would not necessarily be so in Bermondsey”

Malice - Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett

Social benefit - Miller v Jackson

6
New cards

Who can be sued?

Person who caused nuisance or their successors in title - Bybrook v Kent County Council

The person who is causing, or allowing, the nuisance - Tetley v Chitty

If the occupier ‘adopted’ the nuisance - Sedleigh Denfield v O’Callaghan

When the nuisance is caused by natural causes, of which D was aware of and failed to deal with - Leaky v National Trust

7
New cards

Defences

Prescription - Sturges v Bridgeman - if the nuisance has gone on for over 20 years and C made no complaint in that time

Statutory authority - Allen v Gulf Oil Refining