Am Gov Case List

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/32

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

cases for the first amendment

Last updated 1:09 AM on 3/25/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

33 Terms

1
New cards

Lemov v. Kurtsman (1971)

created a three pronged test for religion cases in schools:

  1. law must have a secular purpose

  2. effect of the law must not enhance or prohibit religion

  3. law must not create excessive entanglement between state and religion

2
New cards

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

it’s unconstitutional to make students pray in school

3
New cards

Everson v. BoE (1947)

taxes can pay for taking students to parochial schools, buy secular textbooks, and pay for tuition factors for low-income families

4
New cards

Van Oden v. Perry (2005)

the 10 commandments can be displayed if other religious texts are and if they’re not paid for by tax dollars

5
New cards

Minversville School District v. Gobitis (1940)

upheld the student flag salute mandate in the interest of “national unity”

6
New cards

West Virginia BoE v. Barnette (1943)

reversed the mandatory flag salute decision, saying that one can’t force a unanimous opinion upon people

7
New cards

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)

school attendance beyond 8th grade isn’t mandatory if because of religious beliefs

8
New cards

Employment Division v. Smith (1990)

illegal drugs can’t be used for religious purposes

9
New cards

Santa Fe v. Doe (2000)

student led prayer at school events violates the constitution

10
New cards

U.S v. O’Brien (1968)

burning the draft card isn’t protected by free speech because it could encourage other people to burn their cards and to desert the war

11
New cards

Texas v. Johnson (1989)

burning the u.s flag is a protected form of symbolic, political speech

12
New cards

Morse v. Frederick (2007)

public schools can limit/prohibit speech if it promotes drugs or any illegal substances

13
New cards

Schenck v. U.S (1919)

first amendment doesn’t protect speech that presents a clear and present danger to cause “signifigant evil”

14
New cards

reno v. ACLU

congress cant use blanket statements to regulate online/sent speech based off of its content

15
New cards

brandenburg v. ohio

speech can be limited if it’s directed at incite or produce imminent lawless action or if it can produce it

16
New cards

chaplinsky v. new hampshire

fighting words are not protected by the 1st amendment, fighting words as in words that break the peace and cause direct harm to their target

17
New cards

tinker v desmoins

students dont lose ther 1st amendment rights once on school property, and symbolic speech or poliical are protected in schools

18
New cards

bethel v fraser

the 1st amendment doesnt protect students who make lewd speech or use vulgar language as it’s considered disruptive to the flow of education

19
New cards

hazelwood v. kuhlmeier

schools arent obligated to promote certain kinds of student speech that dont line up with the values of society

20
New cards

NYT v. sullivan

in order to prove libel, you have to prove that the accused was completely aware that they were spreading misinformation

21
New cards

near v minnesota

with very few exceptions, the govt cant censor publications before they’re published

22
New cards

NYT v. U.S (pentagon papes)

for publications not inciting inevitable, direct, and immediate event imperiling the safety of American forces, prior restraint was unjustified

23
New cards

sheppard v. maxwell

sheppard wasnt able to have a fair trial because of the extensive and aggressive media coverage

24
New cards

turner broadcasting v. fcc

must-carry mandates were not unconstitutitonal because they werent determined by content but my broadcasting method

25
New cards

miller v. california

obscene materials are not protected by the first amendment

26
New cards

burstyn v. wilson

court upheld that film is protected by the first amendment

27
New cards

richmond newspaper v. virginia

reporters and news coverage is allowed in courtrooms

28
New cards

cox v. new hampshire

states can place regulations on protests to ensure they keep peace and order

29
New cards

adderly v. florida

state can control its own property for legal, non discriminatory reasons

30
New cards

feiner v. new york

police can suspend free speech if they fear that the speech might cause violence, but not based on the content of the speech

31
New cards

gregory v chicago

arrests for protestors must be backed by actual disorderly conduct

32
New cards

nazi party of america v. village of skokie

you cant disallow a protest/rally based off of its content

33
New cards

dejonge v oregon

states have to adhere by the right to assembly

Explore top flashcards

flashcards
Chapters 10 & 11 Test
56
Updated 1093d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
AP Euro Unit 1+2 Anchors
39
Updated 160d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Intro to Cognitive Psychology
24
Updated 895d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Ch. 17 & 18 Vocabulary
37
Updated 1105d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
COMPSCI 1210 ( COMP ORG)
116
Updated 1106d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Present Perfect
34
Updated 1086d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Chapters 10 & 11 Test
56
Updated 1093d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
AP Euro Unit 1+2 Anchors
39
Updated 160d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Intro to Cognitive Psychology
24
Updated 895d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Ch. 17 & 18 Vocabulary
37
Updated 1105d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
COMPSCI 1210 ( COMP ORG)
116
Updated 1106d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Present Perfect
34
Updated 1086d ago
0.0(0)