* D must take the victim as he finds him, including any factors that make the injuries more severe for them then a “normal” person * e.g. physical weaknesses, medical conditions, allergies, refusal of treatment or failure to get treatment
15
New cards
Thin Skull Rule (Case)
R v Blaue
16
New cards
Intervening Acts
* Acts of 3rd party * Victim’s own act * Natural/Unpredictable event
17
New cards
Acts of 3rd Party
If input adds a “new or independent” element it breaks the chain of causation
18
New cards
Acts of 3rd Party (Case)
R v Cheshire/Jordan
19
New cards
Victim’s Own Act
If V acts in an unforeseeable way it may break the chain of causation
20
New cards
Victim’s Own Act (Case)
R v Roberts/Williams
21
New cards
Natural/Unpredictable Event
Extreme weather and “freak events” e.g. a tree falling on somebody
22
New cards
Mens Rea
Malice Aforethought either express or implied
23
New cards
Express or Implied Intention
Express → Intention to kill
Implied → Intention to cause GBH
24
New cards
Direct or Indirect Intetion
Direct → Actual result is desired result
Indirect → Actual result goes beyond desired result
25
New cards
Virtual Certainty Test
* Used if the intention is indirect * “The consequences, \[death or injury\], was a virtual certainty as a result of D’s actions and D realised this”