1/102
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Prejudice
Making a claim of a crime (aka he committed it because he’s poor) before the evidence has been shared.
9/11
Terrorist attack in the U.S, soldiered by Osama Bin Laden
Classical school of criminology
criminal behaviour is rational, and most people have potential to engage in behaviour
People choose to commit crime after cost-benefit analysis
Fear of punishment keeps people law-abiding
Punishment should fit crime rather than offender
Criminal justice system should be predictable
Positivist school of criminology
human behavior is controlled by physical, mental, and social factors - not free will
Criminals are different from non criminals
Science can be used to study offender
Focus on rehabilitation of “sick” offender
Punishment should fit the offender rather than the crime
Moral poverty
a lack of moral guidance, positive role models, or healthy environments, often linked to growing up in chaotic, abusive, or crime-ridden settings
Economic poverty
Insufficient financial resources to meet basic needs like food, housing, healthcare, and education
Broken windows syndrome
A house in a neighbourhood with graffiti and broken windows, will eventually have the whole neighbourhood the same way
do not overlook the little crimes, they are beginning of big crimes
Lots of critics due to heavy police presence and arresting of big and small crimes
Quantified factors of high crime rate (Macon-Bibb county)
high teenage pregnancy rate
No fatherly figure (boys w/o find role models elsewhere - gang, jail, etc.)
High illiteracy rate (3rd grade level)
High dropout rate
What positions/roles come from English/Colonial roots?
sheriff
Constable
Coroner
Justice of the peace
What is the role of the sheriff?
comes from “shire” and “reeve”; focuses on rural crime control
What is the role of the constable?
No longer exists in America; used to pursue felons.
What is the role of the coroner?
Determining the cause of deaths by violence; serves as sheriff when elected sheriff is disabled or disqualified
What is the role of the justice of peace?
Grant bails, limited jurisdiction in criminal and civil cases
Political era of policing
Politics controlled all, hiring based on patronage, lots of corruption
Reform era of policing
Rejection of patronage, hiring based on merit, “professional” era
police academies and crime labs
Scientific method to solve crimes (fingerprinting)
Police cars (due to larger area) with radios
Community era of policing
Attitude shifted to resolve community problems over locking up bad guys
beat cops to meet neighbours/community
What are the main categories of federal law enforcement?
Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) and Dept. of Justice (DOJ)
Organisation of DHS?
Secretary reports to the president, secretary must be confirmed by the senate; formed in response to 9/11
What agencies are in the DHS?
citizenship and immigration services
Customs and border protection (CBP)
Immigration and customs enforcement (ICE)
Secret service
Transportation security administration (TSA)
Coast guard
Homeland security investigations (HSI)
Cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency (CISA)
And more (22 total)
Organisation of DOJ?
Attorney general appointed by president, US attorney appointed by president and confirmed by senate (prosecuting general)
What agencies are in the DOJ?
federal bureau of investigation (FBI)
Alcohol tobacco and firearms (ATF)
Drug enforcement administration (DEA)
US Marshalls service (USMS)
Bureau of prisons (BOP)
What is the CIA and its importance?
Central Intelligence Agency; undercover operations around the world to manage crises and provide intelligence; independent agency
What is the IRS and it’s importance?
Internal Revenue Service; monitor and collect federal income taxes; only criminal investigation (CI) agency that can investigate potential criminal violations of internal revenue code (tax fraud, etc.)
What is INTERPOL and its importance?
International criminal police organisation; oldest, best-known, only truly international crime organisation; international drug trafficking, bank fraud, money laundering, and counterfeiting
What are the state agencies in GA?
GBI, GSP, municipal police department, sheriff
Who does the GBI respond to and what does it control?
the sheriff, usually about murder or aggravated assault
runs GA state crime lab
What are the responsibilities of GSP?
Traffic enforcement (mainly highways)
What is the municipal police department and its divisions?
Local police department, headed by chief appointed by the mayor
patrol devision, detectives, local crime lab
What is the sheriff and its statutory duties?
Elected by county (politician)
court services, county jail, collect certain taxes, law enforcement (primary duty)
What are the roles of a police officer?
crisis intervenor
In-family fights
Teenage rumbles
Bar brawls
Street corner altercations
Racial disturbances
Riots and similar disturbances
Quote about what police officers should have?
“The wisdom of Solomon, the courage of David, the patience of Job and leadership of Moses, the kindness of the Good Samaritan, the diplomacy of Lincoln, the tolerance of the Carpenter of Nazareth, and an intimate knowledge of every branch of the natural, biological and social sciences”
How are police officers trained?
Go to academy training for operations (reports, patrol, investigations, etc.), weapons/defensive tactics (firearms, deescalation, etc.), self-improvement (ethics, health, etc.), and legal education (criminal/constitutional law, traffic law, etc.)
field training officer, under veteran officer to transition from academy training (3 phases: introductory, training and evaluation, final phase - observation)
Four basic tasks of policing
1) enforce the laws
2) perform welfare tasks
3) prevent crime
4) protect the innocent
Three styles of policing
1) watchman (police as neighbour; overlook minor crimes to maintain order)
2) legalistic (police as soldier; higher arrest/ticket rate, purpose of law is to punish)
3) service (police as teacher; serve the community)
Perils of patrol
Police carry firearms because many people want to prevent them from doing their job (i.e. tackle, harm, etc.)
The onion field murders: traffic stop turned to police nightmare - criminals forced police to drive to field after traffic stop and murdered one of them
Sources of stress for police officers
1) organisational and administrative (reports, supervisors, etc.)
2) criminal justice system (courts, prosecutors, parole board, etc.)
3) the public (someone will always be mad - family, victims)
4) intrinsic to police work (domestic violence, felonies, etc.)
What is the most stressful thing that happens to an officer?
Causing the death of another = gets taken off active duty, investigation/suspension
What is formality of a case?
Has to do with the way the law is written
What is reality of a case?
How the law is actually practiced
Types of police discretion?
Stern or lenient
Determinants of police discretion?
1) the law
2) officer’s attitude
3) citizen’s attitude
4) other
victim preference, criminal record, strength of evidence, agency pressure, media influence, witness credibility, etc.
What case is a police officer ALWAYS required by law to arrest the primary offender?
Domestic violence cases
What happens to discretion as an officer’s rank increases?
Ability to employ discretion decreases with increase in rank
What is the role of the first forensic officer on the scene?
Secure the scene, protect from contamination, take photos of scene, fingerprints, ballistics, blood/biological material, surveillance?, cell phones, social media
What is corpus delicit?
“Body of the crime”; physical evidence of crime committed
What is modus operandi?
“Method of operation”; evidence showing means used by criminal to commit act
How can ballistics (shell casings) be beneficial to a forensic officer?
Can match bullet to type of weapon used, certain striations can be used to match specific gun, microscopic view of bullet can also be helpful
What is the CSI effect?
TV shows and movies have changed how juries/citizens think of forensic evidence - usually for the worst (unrealistic expectations)
What do detectives/investigators do after crime scene is processed?
Locate victims and witnesses, interview witnesses, evaluate crime lab reports, draft search warrants, prepare subpoenas for phone records (etc.), develop informants
How to brief a case?
What are the facts? What happening in the court below? What is the issue for the appellate court? What is the holding (decision)? What rule/doctrine does the court apply? Why is this case significant?
When is an officer authorised to use deadly force?
When they reasonably believe that someone is going to use deadly force on them
What does the fourth amendment apply to?
Unreasonable searches and seizures, warrants must be supported by probable cause
What is the use of force categorised as?
A seizure
Tennessee vs Garner
Facts: 15yr running and escaping after burglary, officer shot and killed him, family now suing officer
Issue: belief of violation of 4th amendment right and using unreasonable deadly force
Holding: violation of 4th amendment to use deadly force on nonviolent fleeing felon
Significance: first time Supreme Court said 4th amendment applies to police use of force
What is a 1983 action?
A civil action under federal statute, where family sues for violation of constitutional right, seeking monetary damages
Graham vs Connor
Facts: diabetic went to store and get juice, but left quickly cause of line → police officer felt it was suspicious and held him in cuffs
Issue: can officers be held liable under 4th amendment for excessive force, and what standard should be used?
Holding: use of force must be objectively reasonable in view of all the facts and circumstances - from perspective of reasonable officer on the scene (not hindsight)
Significance: outlined appropriate constitutional standard by which to judge excessive force claims
Reforms after Graham vs Connor decision?
Officers are required to use body cams, stop militarisation of police, dash cams in cop cars, DOJ insight and investigations of police shootings
Scott vs Harris
Facts: officer blocked Harris at speeding (73 in a 55), harris drove off initiating a chase → officer attempted to terminate shade by using a pit manoeuvre
Issue: can an officer place a fleeing motorist at risk of injury or death in order to stop them from fleeing and placing lives of others in danger
Holding: officer’s attempt to terminate high-speed chase that threatens lives of innocent bystanders does not violate 4th amendment rights
Significance: clarified when police are allowed to use deadly force in a police case
Mapp vs Ohio
Facts: Mapp was shown a supposed search warrant after refusal to consent to search, officers apprehended her and searched through her belongings → found nude drawings and charged her for possession of obscene material
Issue: should the evidence have been inadmissible in court, enforcing 4th amendment on 14th amendment due process
Holding: all evidence obtained in violation of federal constitution is inadmissible in court
Significance: ruling imposed the exclusionary rule upon the states
US vs Leon
Facts: police obtained search warrants for property and vehicles in drug trafficking investigation, later courts believed there was not probable cause for the warrants and that the 4th amendment exclusionary rule should apply
Issue: should 4th amendment exclusionary rule be applied to evidence gathered by officers acting in good-faith and later deemed to be invalid
Holding: 4th amendment exclusionary rule should not be applied to evidence obtained by officers acting in reasonable reliance to issued search warrants
Significance: created the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule; allowing evidence to be shown in trial if it can be shown officers acted unaware of the violations
What rights do inmates have?
Right to a safe facility, adequate medical care
What happens if an officer injures an inmate (intentionally or unintentionally)?
Sheriff is required to provide medical care to the inmate; inmate can possibly sue
Deprivation of rights under color of law (federal crime prosecution)
Wilful action under color of law, deprivation of constitutional rights by reason of race, color, or alien status
Internal affairs investigation
When officer accused, internal affairs officer investigates and reports directly to the chief
Consent decree
If officer involved in holistic case of trampling the rights of the accused, department will get a consent of decree where judge monitors activity of department
What is civil liability?
Department is held responsible for causing harm, loss, or injury to another party, typically resulting in a duty to pay monetary damages; arises from non-criminal, private disputes—such as negligence, breach of contract, or defamation—aiming to compensate the victim rather than punish the offender
What was the original bill of rights?
Restrictions on federal government that protected individuals and states from the new national government
4th amendment
Right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized
Search warrants
Must be based on probable cause, on oath, describe particularly the place to be searched and the thing to be seized, neutral and detached magistrate must determine probable cause
What is remedy for violation of the 4th amendment?
The exclusionary rule
What is the exclusionary rule?
Evidence obtained in violation of the 4th amendment is excluded from the court
14th amendment
Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws
Due process of law (clause)
Supreme Court applies original bill of rights to the states under the 14th amendment - “incorporation”
Terry vs Ohio
Facts: detective watched terry and chilton supposedly casing a store and meet up with a third man, Katz. Officer proceeded to stop and search them, revealing two revolvers
Issue: can a police officer conduct a stop and frisk based on reasonable suspicion
Holding: a police officer with reasonable suspicion may briefly stop an individual for questioning and perform a pat-down of the outer clothing if he fears for his safety
Significance: authorised police to conduct a “stop and frisk” or investigative detention
Warden vs Hayden
Facts: an armed robbery took place and Hayden entered a nearby house. Police asked the wife if they could search and she had no objections. They found Hayden, along with guns, ammunitions, and clothes of the suspect.
Issue: under the 4th amendment, is there a distinction between evidentiary materials and those that may validly be seized
Holding: distinction prohibiting seizure of items of only evidential value and allowing seizure of instrumentalities, fruits, or contraband is no longer accepted as being required by 4th amendment
Significance: a warrant is not required if probable cause and exigent circumstances exist; no distinction between types of evidence
Chimel vs California
Facts: police officers with an arrest warrant were let into the house by Chimel’s wife, where they waited to arrest him. Upon arrest they searched the house to see if they could find any evidence
Issue: can police officers search the area surrounding an arrestee incident to a lawful arrest
Holding: police may search within the immediate area of an arrestee, in order to discover weapons and prevent destruction of evidence
Significance: police may not only search a person when making an arrest but also surrounding area
Carroll vs US
Facts: prohibition agents patrolled along highways in and out of Detroit, observed the “Carroll boys” en route to Grand Rapids, knew they were bootleggers and pulled them over and searched the car, finding then banned alcoholic beverages
Issue: does the 4th amendment prohibit officers from conducting warrantless roadside searches of a vehicle when there exists probable cause
Holding: police are authorised to undertake warrantless roadside search if there is probable cause and belief of criminal activity
Significance: officers constitutionally authorised to undertake warrantless roadside search of a vehicle if the time to go through judicial branches will cause evidence to be long gone
South Dakota vs Opperman
Facts: Opperman’s car had previously been impounded, was again impounded and search conducted as usual. Found marijuana and charged with narcotics
Issue: do police inventory searches of impounded vehicles violate 4th amendment
Holding: a warrantless, suspicionless inventory search of an impounded vehicle does not violate the 4th amendment
Significance: first case to constitutionally sanction police inventory searches
Katz vs US
Facts: Katz indicted and convicted on federal charges for transmitting betting information across state lines by way of telephone. Evidence obtained by recording device in public pay phone
Issue: is a public telephone booth constitutionally protected from electronic eavesdropping by the 4th amendment
Holding: individuals who use a public telephone booth possess a reasonable expectation of privacy
Significance: overturned Olmstead vs US, broadens 4th amendment protective scope, set forth notion that conducting business in public does not mean there is no expectation of privacy
Commands of 4th amendment
Searches must be reasonable, require a warrant that must be supported by probable cause, issued by neutral and detached magistrate, describe with particularity (place to be searched and thing to be seized)
What is probable cause?
For an officer to make an arrest or conduct a search of someone’s person or effects, officer must have a reasonable basis to believe a crime has been or is about to be committed by that individual
when facts and circumstances are sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the suspect had committed a crime
What goes into probable cause?
More than bare suspicion, less than proof beyond a reasonable doubt, may be from victims, reliable informants, other investigators
What does a search warrant do?
Authorises officers to search for designated items, must provide supporting facts to show probable cause for each item named in the warrant, authorises search only for those items
Seven exceptions to search warrant requirement
search incident to arrest, vehicle searches, exigent circumstances/hot pursuit, consent, plain view, inventory, stop and frisk
search incident to arrest
with valid arrest, and only in immediate control (w/in grasp)
chimel vs California
Vehicle searches
supported by probable cause to believe vehicle contains evidence of crime, based on mobility of vehicle (exigency)
Carrol vs US
Exigent circumstances/hot pursuit
must have probable cause, narrow exception to cross threshold of a person’s home
emergency to save live, risk of destruction of evidence
Warden vs Hayden
Consent
4th amendment waived, must be voluntary (cannot be obtained by unlawful seizure)
totality of the circumstances: youth of accused, lack of education, lack of advice of rights, length of detention, repeated/prolonged nature of questioning, depreciation of food/sleep
Plain view
police authorised to seize what is in plain view, IF already on the premises
does not authorise warrantless entry
Inventory
probable cause not required to conduct administrative inventory/police department policy
South Dakota vs opperman
Stop and frisk
“Terry doctrine”; court recognised lower standard of reasonable suspicion authorising officers to stop, detain, and ask questions; fear of safety allows officers to conduct an outer pat-down
terry vs ohio
Can police stop a vehicle on reasonable suspicion?
Full blown search no authorised unless probable cause, if he finds probable cause can arrest offender, then search incident to arrest applies
5th amendment rights
Grand jury indictment, double jeopardy clause, self-incrimination, due process clause, takins clause (nothing taken without compensation)
6th amendment rights
Speedy trial, impartial jury, nature and cause of accusation, right to confront witnesses, compulsory process to obtain witness, assistance of counsel for defence
Gideon vs Wainwright
Facts: Gideon convicted for felony burglary, asked for a lawyer, Florida law said only capital crimes get an appointed lawyer, represented himself and pronounced guilty, at the time the judge was right not to appoint counsel
Issue: does the 6th amendment require that legal counsel be appointed to represent an indignant defendant in state felony prosecution
Holding: 6th amendment requires appointment of legal counsel to represent an indignant defendant facing prosecution on state felony
Significance: applied 6th amendment to state felony prosecutions, attorney must be provided free of charge for those who cannot afford one on their own means
Pre-Miranda decision rights
Confessions must be voluntary, not coerced; test = totality of the circumstances
Miranda vs Arizona
Facts: Miranda charged for kidnapping and sexual assault, police questioned him at the station house in custody (custodial interrogation), confessed in custody
Issue: must police inform suspect of dual constitution rights to legal representation and protection from self-incrimination during custodial interrogation
Holding: custodial interrogation is inherently coercive, therefore must read rights; incriminating statement obtained in violation of these rights are inadmissible in trial; use 5th amendment right against self incrimination to enforce 6th amendment right to counsel
Significance: police required during custodial interrogation to read a suspects Miranda rights
Miranda Warning rights
Remain silent, anything said can be used in court, lawyer during questioning, have free lawyer appointed, suspect may stop questioning at any time and request attorney
What is custody?
Restraint of freedom associated with formal arrest
Berkemer vs McCarty
Facts: McCarty’s vehicle operated erratically, officer did roadside questioning, driver made verbal statements about what he drank and smoked, was not read his Miranda warnings
Issue: was this custodial interrogation/require Miranda warnings to be given
Holding: if the traffic stop is valid, roadside questioning is NOT custodial, and therefore does not require Miranda warnings
Significance: officers do not need to read Miranda rights each and every time there is a lawful traffic stop