Subject Matter Jurisdiction

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 15

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Professor Laing - Fall 2024

SMJ

16 Terms

1

Subject Matter Jurisdiction (§1331)

Federal question

New cards
2

What case illustrates federal question jurisdiction based on rule §1331?

Louisville NashvilleRailroad v. Mottley

New cards
3

Subject Matter Jurisdiction (§1332)

Diversity jurisdiction

New cards
4

What cases illustrate diversity jurisdiction based on rule §1332?

  • Hawkins v. Masters Farm Inc.

  • Redner v. Sanders

  • Hertz Corp. v. Friend

New cards
5

Hawkins v. Masters Farm Inc.

  • Established diversity jurisdiction

  • domiciled means physical presence and the intent to stay

New cards
6

Subject Matter Jurisdiction (§1446(c)(1))

Removal based on diversity jurisdiction

New cards
7

What case illustrates subject matter jurisdiction based on §1446(c)(1)?

Keller Logistics Group, Inc. v. Navistar, Inc.

New cards
8

Keller Logistics Group, Inc. v. Navistar, Inc.

Which case tells us that

  • there is a 1 year statute of limitations to remove a case upon start date

  • defendant has 30 days within the year to remove case upon the date it becomes removable

New cards
9

Subject Matter Jurisdiction (§1367(a))

Supplemental jurisdiction

New cards
10

What case illustrates supplemental jurisdiction?

In re Ameriquest Mortgage Co. Mortgage Lending Practices Litigation

New cards
11

In re Ameriquest Mortgage Co. Mortgage Lending Practices Litigation

Which case tells us that “A loose factual connection is sufficient to confer supplemental jurisdiction so long as those facts arise from a common nucleus of operative facts”?

New cards
12

Redner v. Sanders

Which case tells us about

  • the amount in controversy

  • Parties are from different states/a foreign country

New cards
13

Hertz Corp. v. Friend

  • Nerve center

  • principal place of business

  • incorporated in the forum state

  • plaintiffs can aggregate claims

New cards
14

Subject Matter Jurisdiction (§1367(c))

Discretionary exercise of supplemental jurisdiction

New cards
15

What case illustrates discretionary exercise of supplemental jurisdiction?

Szendrey-Ramos v. First Bancorp

New cards
16
New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 1 person
808 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 16 people
847 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 30 people
704 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 54 people
185 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 181 people
919 days ago
5.0(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 35 people
243 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 3 people
51 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 21 people
612 days ago
5.0(1)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (59)
studied byStudied by 3 people
147 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (35)
studied byStudied by 10 people
549 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (415)
studied byStudied by 6 people
631 days ago
4.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (30)
studied byStudied by 5 people
701 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (104)
studied byStudied by 117 people
371 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (30)
studied byStudied by 29 people
423 days ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (57)
studied byStudied by 17 people
707 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (40)
studied byStudied by 35 people
48 minutes ago
5.0(1)
robot