Intro to Mens Rea | Subjective & Objective Mens Rea | Forms of Subjective Mens Rea | The Concepts of Intention and Knowledge in the CCC
Objective mens Rea
Subjective mens rea
What was actually going on in the mind of the accused at the time of the offense
The mental fault lies in what the accused intended/knew at the time of the misconduct (i.e. deliberately choosing to do wrong)
Mental fault lies in the failure to direct the mind to the risk of conduct OR failure to live up to the standards of care expected of a reasonable person.
What should have been in the mind of the accused at the time of the misconduct, had they acted reasonably
That the accused deliberately chose to do something wrong
By legal definition, either/or;
That the accused had the deliberate intention to bring about those prohibited consequences (e.g. 1st degree murder)
That the accused had the subjective realization that their conduct might produce such prohibited consequences and proceeded with this conduct regardless of their actual knowledge of this risk.
That the accused had the capacity to live up to the standard of care expected of a reasonable person and failed to do so.
I.e. a reasonable person in the same circumstance and with the same knowledge as the accused would appreciated that their conduct is creating a risk of prohibited consequence and would have taken action to avoid doing so
General intent offenses are committed for the sake of committing the crime; usually an act of momentary passion (e.g. sexual assault)
Specific intent offenses are usually means-to-an-end misconduct ; seen often as a deliberate and preconceived step towards an illegal goal (e.g. shooting a cashier in the middle of a robbery)
Intent
Knowledge
Recklessness
Willful blindness
Any specific state of mind as required in the legal definition of the offense (e.g. first degree murder => proof of “planned and deliberate“)