1/5
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Contributory Negligence:
Contributory Negligence Act 1945
when C is in some way at fault → partial defence for D
If successful- D’s damages will be reduced
Contributory Negligence: Froom
No seatbelt → D claimed CN and was successful
Consent:
C consented to the risk of injury & they exercised free choice
Complete defence (D wont pay damages)
Consent: Morris
C had consented getting into the plane, knowing his friend -D- (the pilot) had been drinking → family of D used defence & didn’t have to pay damages
Adequate Precautions:
If D proved they had taken AP- they will most likely get the defence
Public Benefit:
Watt: unlikely to be liable if the public benefits from the risk