1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
what is the bottom up approaches
developed in Britain, dosen’t use fixed typologies
generate pic of offender, likely characteristics through analysis of evidence at crime scene
uses investigative psychology and geographical profiling
Investigative psychology
attempting to apply statistical procedures & psychological theory to analysis of crime scene, to establish patterns of behaviour likely to occur in diff scenes
Interpersonal coherence- how offender behaves at scene
Significance of time & place- indicates where offender lives if crime is within centre of gravity
Forensic awareness- behaviours indicating if offender has been involved with police in past
Geographical profiling
uses info about location of crime to make inferences about likely home or base of offender
based on spatial consistency where offenders will stick to an area theyre familiar with- creates a sense of gravity
Circle theory- 2 models of offender behaviour
Marauder- offender operates close proximity to their home
Commuters- offender travels from usual home
Strength of geographical profiling- research support
Lundrigan & Canter collected info from 120 murder cases from serial killers
showed spatial consistency in behaviour of killers location of each body disposal site, creating a centre of gravity
Offenders base was located in centre of pattern and was more noticeable in marauders
Supports view that geographical profiling can be used to identify offender
Limitation- may not always be accurate (case of Rachel Nickell)
was stabbed and used a bottom up approach to identify murderer
targeted Colin Stagg who fitted offender profile and an undercover police woman perused a romantic interest to get him to confess to the murder- judge rejected case when taken to court
16yrs later, real murder was found who was ruled out at early stage as he was inches taller than profile
ECONOMIC IMPLICATION- waste money & time setting up honey traps and convicting wrong person
Strength of investigative psychology- research support
Canter & Heritage analysed 66 sexual assault cases using smallest space analysis, many behaviours identified as common in diff samples of behaviour
each person showed characteristic pattern of certain behaviour, helping establish if 2 or more offences were committed by same person
Supports one principle of investigative psychology- people are consistent in their behaviour
Limitation- produces mixed results
tested profiling skills of chemistry students and police
students produced more accurate profiles and the more experienced the officer was, the more inaccurate their profile was
suggests profiling involves more than guesswork.