1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Q: What time period is referred to as the "long eighteenth century"?
A: Roughly 1700–1800.
Q: How did European art in the 18th century represent African slaves and servants?
A: Often as background figures or attendants in aristocratic portraits, emphasizing wealth and colonial power while highlighting their subordination.Q: What is the concept of "visible invisibility" in aristocratic portraiture?
Q: What is the concept of "visible invisibility" in aristocratic portraiture?
A: Black people were depicted in portraits, but their identities and humanity were often obscured, reinforcing their status as servants or property.
Q: How does the article "Repositioning the voices of enslaved people through art" aim to change traditional depictions of enslaved people?
A: By reinterpreting art to give enslaved people agency, recognizing their humanity and contributions to European wealth.
Q: What is significant about David Martin's "Portrait of Dido Elizabeth Belle Lindsay and Lady Elizabeth Murray" (1778)?
A: It portrays Dido Elizabeth Belle, a mixed-race woman, with dignity, highlighting the complex intersections of race and class in 18th-century Britain.
Q: How were luxury goods like tea, coffee, sugar, tobacco, and silk viewed in the 18th century?
A: They were symbols of status, but also criticized for contributing to moral decay and materialism derived from colonial exploitation.
Q: What was the criticism of luxury goods in the 18th century?
A: Critics argued that the demand for such goods, produced through slavery and exploitation, led to moral corruption, materialism, and trivial pursuits.
Q: How did some elites view colonial trade and goods?
A: As symbols of prosperity, celebrating the wealth brought by colonial possessions and trade, including the triangular trade.
Q: What does "cultural cross-dressing" refer to in 18th-century art?
A: Europeans adopting Indian clothing, customs, and décor to display dominance while indulging in the exotic appeal of Indian culture.
Q: What do mixed-race children depicted in portraits signify?
A: They reflect the blending of British and Indian cultures during colonialism, often symbolizing the racial and social dynamics of colonial India.Q: What does the Palmer Family portrait depict?
Q: What does the Palmer Family portrait depict?
A: Major William Palmer and his family, with an enslaved African servant in the background, illustrating the intersection of race, class, and colonial power.
Q: What reforms did Governor General Cornwallis implement in the East India Company?
A: He introduced race-conscious policies, promoting racial segregation in the colonial administration, and created a new type of colonial civil servant to maintain British control.
Q: How did Cornwallis’s reforms reflect growing racial distinctions in the British Empire?
A: By establishing racial segregation and emphasizing the superiority of British officials over Indians in governance.
Q: What does the article "The Palmer Family" highlight about 18th-century colonial Britain?
A: It highlights how enslaved people were visible in wealthy family portraits yet marginalized and invisible in broader society, reflecting the complex dynamics of race and imperialism.
Q: What is the significance of art in understanding the intersection of race, empire, and power in the 18th century?
A: Art reflected and shaped colonial ideologies, reinforcing racialized systems of power and the exploitation that supported European prosperity.