1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Summary offences
minor criminal offences
resolved in the magistrates court with a hearing
found in the summary offences act 1966 (vic)
examples - disorderly conduct, common assault, tattooing of juveniles
indictable offences
serious offences
usually heard by a judge and a jury in a county or supreme court trial division (you will have a trial)
found in the crimes act 1958 (vic)
examples : murder, kidnapping, stalking
indictable offences heard summarily
less serious indictable offences may be heard summarily if deemed appropriate by the magistrates court.
when may an indictable offence be heard summarily?
if the court deems that it is appropriate
the accused agrees
the punishment is under 10 years
examples of indictable offences that may be heard summarily
theft/robbery if the amount stolen is under 10k
recklessly causing serious injury
the burden of proof
the responsibility of proving the facts of the case. ie. the party responsible for proving the standard of proof. in criminal cases, the prosecution has the burden of proof.
the standard of proof
the strength of evidence or level of confidence required to support a case. the standard of proof in criminal cases is beyond reasonable doubt. this means there is so reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty.
the presumption of innocence
the guarantee that all persons accused of a crime will be innocent until it is proven, beyond reasonable doubt, that they are guilty.
How is the presumption of innocence protected
the burden of proof
the case must be proven beyond reasonable doubt
need proof of mens rea and actus reus before someone is arrested
can appeal a wrongful conviction
right to legal representation
right to silence
right to bail
mens rea
the state of mind statutorily required in order to convict a particular defendant of a particular crime
actus reus
action or conduct which is a constituent element of a crime, as opposed to the mental state of the accused
why is the standard of proof important
the standard of proof is a fundamental legal principle that dictates the required level of certainty needed to establish a fact or guilt in a criminal case. it is necessary and important because it defines the threshold for evidence, ensuring fairness, preventing the abuse of power and minimising the risk of wrongful convictions.