1/39
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Less perception and more cognition
start as bundles of reflexes
sensorimotor
hold mental representations - object permanence
pre-operational
manipulate (multiple) representations
concrete
abstract representations
formal
end as swiss scientists
What develops in stage theories?
knowledge structures: How children think about something (how to solve addition problem)
NOT content: What children know about something (not memorizing 2+2=4)
Schemas: Organized ways of making sense of experience (specific=students, public transportation, etc.)
Change with age
action-based (motor patterns) at first
later move to a mental (thinking) level
2 mechanisms of change in Schemas
Assimilation - fitting new info into old scheme; translate info into a form you can understand; using current schemes to interpret external world; used during equilibrium
Accommodation - old scheme doesn’t work, may make new scheme to fit new info; change current knowledge structure; prompted by disequilibrium
What happens during sensorimotor?
major goal = mental representations
object permanence
Characteristics of preoperations
believe in magical thinkings
Animism - give inanimate things human qualities
Centration - focus on only one factor
dominate by perceptual cues
fail class inclusion tasks
don’t know about permanence of states and traits
Egocentric - can’t see someone else’s POV
can’t manipulate multiple mental representations
Egocentrism: 3 mountains task
children was shown two sides of a mountains and asked to answer what the interviewer was seeing, children described what they saw
preschoolers choose own pov
problem
does not equal perceiving and remembering
does equal simultaneous manipulation of 2 pov
reliable task
Liquid conservation
2 glasses are asked to be filled equally then 1 is poured into a different shorter and wider container and asked if they are equal
some children failed and said they are not equal
some children succeeded and said they were still equal
Criteria for being a “conserver”
reversibility
identity
compensation
Number conservation
candies are put into 2 rows and asked who has more, then they are spread out and asked again
some children failed and said the spread out row has more
some children succeeded and said they are still equal
Are there universals in motor development
yes: children everywhere reach, sit, walk
but also no: nothing is obligatory
Yes: Children everywhere reach, sit, walk
same basic skills despite highly variable experiences
acquire skills that all cultures value
AND No: Nothing is Obligatory
crawling is a major milestone on assessment scales. but can be missing!
infants skip crawling
17% British infants (Robson 1984)
29% Jamican infants; others crawl at same age as they walk (Hapkins and Westra 1989,1990)
40% US infants in 1900 (Trettien 1900)
Milestons are only a metaphor
Developmental Milestones Approach
certain skills are important markers of development
universal age-related sequence
all infants acquire all skills in the sequence
no skipping or going backwards
notion of onset ages
specific day acquisition
guided by group averages
Milestone Metaphor is Poor Way to Think About Development
Skills on the charts are arbitrary
based on Gesell’s sample: 500 infants around Yale University, British or German background, middle-class, 2-parent homes
play with objects, record behavior
found average age for skills = norms
Milestone metaphor ignores cultural differences
The “typical child” is no child at all
milestone metaphor ignores variability and individual differences
Motor Milestones
Crawling
many different types
Standards Hands/Knees Crawling
alternating hands and knees touching the ground
“Army” Belly Crawling
stomach touches ground
pulling motion
Hands/Feet “Bear” Crawling
not on milestone charts
alternating hands and feet, knees dont touch the ground
“Crab” Crawling and Bum Shuffling
Locomotion is idiosyncratic
very different
scooting motions, crab like
Knee Walking
locomotion is creative
hopping and alternating knees
no hands
Combination Crawling
infants find unique moves
combo of all
pulling, scooting, hopping, etc
if it moves their body, babies are likely to do it
Formal Routines in Some Cultures in Africa, India, & Caribbean (Hopkins, 1976; Hopkins & Westra 1989,1990)
massaging or head, spine, butt
suspension and stretching
by head or legs
practice sitting or stepping
More Practice Speeds Onset Ages
special practice in lab experiments (Zelazo et al 1972)
everyday childrearing practices (exercise, stretching, how babies are held, carried, bathed, laid down, massage, etc)
Mali Bath and Exercise
grandma bathing baby
baby seems upset and not handled normally like in the US
outside, in a bowl, with a sponge'
stretches baby and aspirated baby → multiple times a day
Formal Handling and Timing of Motor Skills (Hopkins & Westra 1989,1990)
tested 3 groups of mother-infant pairs living in England
Jamaican mothers who exercise infants
Jamaican mothers who dont exercise infants
British mothers who dont exercise infants
same prenatal and neonatal care, living situations, SES, etc
looked at age that infants sit, crawl, and walk
not much difference
Expectations and Childrearing Practices
Cameroon and German mothers (Keller, Yovsi & Voelker 2002)
What looks strange depends on your experiences and expectations
Special Practice Leads to Special Skills (Myrtle McGraw 1930s-1940s)
Studied twins Jimmy and Johnny
Johnny trained 8hrs a day 5 days a week from birth to 2.5 yrs old
Jimmy in nursery playpen, routine schedule, no special training
Johnny was no different than Jimmy with basic skills
they differed with specialty skills
Most infants develop normally without special training
Summary
no universal milestones
timing of motor skills can change
normal environment is enough
environment can change timing of skills
BUT, children can learn amazing skills
Ethical guidelines
informed consent
debriefing
risks/benefits ratio
Informed Consent
explain details
sign before start
can stop any time
easy language
Zimbardo prison experiment (1970s)
all male college students were split into two roles; cops and prisoners
experiment got out of control, students were taking role too seriously
Preschoolers and infants
cant have them leave worse than they came
cant give consent on their own
Debriefing
explain purpose
especially important in studies involving deception
Milgram shock experiment (1960s)
deliver shock (not real) to a person learning words
study to see how far ppl would go
had to be told that shocks were not actually real- the debrief
Ceci’s children’s eyewitness testimony
children’s ability to recall events
children were told ridiculous stories and were asked about the story
found that children were suggestible
honest misremembering
Risks/benefits ratio
damage to participant vs. benefit to researcher + participant
too much risk = danger
mental, physical, emotional damage
too much benefit = coercion
info, physical benefits
Twins Del and Rey by Wayne and Marsena Dennis (1930s)
Great Depression
Nature vs. Nurture
swaddled → fell behind development → paralyzed
Sheldon Cohen’s research on colds
people were given cold virus or placebo in a hotel
then people were put under stressful events and it was seen who got sick
IRB
Institutional Review Board
for all federally funded research
what about institutions that DONT get federal money?
can choose to bring people together to make an IRB
Research with Child Participants
more extensive guidelines
legally are minors
incompletely developed cognitive capacity
limited experiences
after 9 yrs old, child can give asent- saying yes but no legal standing
Committee on Ethical Conduct in Child Development Research 1990
14 principles that researchers should abide by when conducting research with children
non-harmful procedures, informed consent, parent consent, additional consent, fair incentives, anonymity
Major theories of cognitive development
Piaget’s theory- structures and stage
Information-processing theories- processes
Core knowledge theories- innate abilities
Sociocultural theories- social context and people
likely to agree with some aspects of some theories and disagree with other aspects
Jean Piaget: Great Observer
swiss scientist- published in 1930s, translated to English in 1960s (competent infant)
Book “Origin of Intelligence”- observations of own 3 children
work still present in today’s world
Ways to study children
Observations both naturalistic and experimental
concentric clinical method- asking and interviewing children in flexible and structured way
how does thinking change over time
“Child constructs Reality”
Constructivist theory
“Construct reality” = making sense of the world
child is building own knowledge
child is active in own learning
child as a “scientist”- active learners
both continuous and discontinuous aspects
Piaget’s stages of cognitive development
sensorimotor: 0-2 yrs
preoperations: 2-7 yrs
concrete operations: 7-12 yrs
formal operations: 12+
Piaget didnt care about ages, just stages!
stages move forwards, no backward and no skipping