COMD 3383 Exam 2 Critical Thinking

Clarity

is it clear/understanable? did you eleborate, provide exampes, or illstruate your point to make it as understabld as possible for reader/listeners?

Accuracy

is it true? can it verified?

Precision

does the statement consider all details to make its message completely understanabl, unable to be msiterpreted, by listenrrs or readers

Relevance

does it answer the question

Depth

does it address the complexities of a difficult problem at hand?

Breadth

does it consider multiple points of view; does it consider a broad, diverse range/ways of thinking?

Logic

does it all make sense, follow a singular line of reasoning

Significance 

are we considering the most important information? what is not as important to consider?

Fairness

fact that humans commonly ignore relevant facts and insights when they are not in line with one’s interest or agenda.

• am i considering all viewpoints with an unbiased, objective lens; am i letting my own interests and agenda from preventing me from thinkling fairly

Sufficiency

is there enough information to answer the question? is it detailed, vast, relavent, and accurate AND WAS EVERYTHING GATHERED POSSIBE? 

1. clarity

2. accuracy

3. precisioon

4. relevance

5. depth

6. breadth

7. logic

8. fairness