1/6
Name  | Mastery  | Learn  | Test  | Matching  | Spaced  | 
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Who developed the theory of different types of LTM?
Tulving.
Describe procedural memory.
Implicit/non-declarative (unconscious) LTM role for knowing how to do things i.e. memory of motor skills
Not time stamped
V resistant to forgetting, non-autobiographical
- Practice influences strength
Location: cerebellum & motor cortex
What is semantic memory?
Explicit/declarative (conscience), LTM role for storing general information about the world e.g. London is a capital city, general knowledge
Not time stamped, not autobiographical
Resistant to forgetting
- How deeply processed influences strength
Location: temporal bias (hippocampus)
What is Episodic memory?
Explicit/declarative LTM role storing information about events in life
e.g. 1st day at school, birthday, wedding day
Time stamped (stored with reference to time & place)
Autobiographical (you’re apart of the memories)
Easiest memory to forget
- level of emotion felt at time increases strength
Location: temporal lobes (hippocampus)
Outline the case of HM in terms of different types of LTM.
PROCEDURE:
Researchers asked him to draw within the lines of a shape with a mirror 10x a day for 3 days
Counted how many mistakes he did
RESULTS:
As his practice increased his lines improved, less mistakes even though he couldn’t recall practicing it
CONCLUSION:
His episodic memory was damaged as he couldn’t recall practicing butt his procedural memory was still intact as his lines improved
Case adds validity to the theory of the different types of LTM
Outline the case study of Clive Wearing in terms of different types of LTM.
After a brain infection, Wearing’s procedural memory seemed intact (e.g. being able to dress himself & even play the piano)
Episodic memory was severely damaged, couldn’t remember seeing a doctor, couldn’t remember a conversation he just had
Evaluation of Tulving’s theory of 3 types of LTM.
STRENGTHS:
Clinical evidence/case studies: Clive wearing - amnesia & HM = hippocampus
Neurological Evidence: Brain activity when doing certain tasks, shows physical reality to different types of LTM
WEAKNESSES:
Case studies: are individuals/ small group so not representative of everyone, issue of individual differences = lack of generalisability because cases are unique