1/44
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Elements of a Contract
Offer
Acceptance
Consideration
Bilateral Contracts
A promise for a promise
Unilateral Contracts
A promise for an act
Acceptance by completion of requested act
Majority View (modern)
contracts are bilateral unless specified
Void Contracts
without legal effect
Illegal from beginning
Voidable Contract
One or both parties may elect to avoid or ratify
Unenforceable Contract
Otherwise, valid, but not enforceable due to various defenses
Creation of a Contract
Was there mutual assent
Was there consideration
Are there any defenses
Offer and Acceptance
Meeting of the minds
objective minds
The offer
Offeree: power of acceptance
Offeror: corresponding liability
The offer
language, circumstances and prior practice
legal offer requires
definitive terms
identify the offeror, offeree and subject matter
price
time of payment, delivery and preformance
quantity
the nature of the work
communication to the offeree
Acceptance
Unequivocal
mirror image rule: the acceptance must precisely mirror the offer
Silence is not acceptance
“Only but” = rejection
Termination by offeror
Person who made the offer
Revocation: terminates the power of acceptance
Effective when received
Best to direct
Mailbox rule: when it hits your mailbox is valid
Termination of Offeree
Rejection
Express→ nope
Counteroffer→ back and forth
Termination by Operation of Law
Death or adjudicated incompetent
Subject matter destroyed
Legislation makes K illegal
Consideration
The price for enforceability
Valuable consideration: change in legal position between the parties
Bargained for exchange between the parties: promise and detriment→ each induces the other
MUST have legal value: mutual benefit, economic benefit not required, past or moral acts are insufficient
Defenses
Void or Voidable
Illegal Subject matter
Can’t force something Illegal
Insanity
Mistake of Material Fact
Defenses to Contracts
Material: something that really matters
Bilateral: both parties made a mistake
Unilateral: if the other person doesn’t know then it is forceable
Fraud, undue influence, duress
Defense to Contracts
One party agrees based on a lie or anything
takes awa acceptance & can pull contact
Duress: one part forced into agreement for fear of life
Statute of Frauds
Agreements that must be in writing
Sale of property or interest of land
collateral promises to pay the debt of another
Sale of goods above certain amount (500+)
In which, terms can’t be performed within one year
Essential Terms must be included in the writing
identity of the party against whom enforcement is sought
subject mater
terms and conditions
consideration
signature of the party of be charged (seller)
Third Party Beneficiaries
Person or people who are not contracting parties but can still receive the benefits of a contract
Exception to the privity of contract doctrine
Limited to: intended beneficiaries
Performance rendered to beneficiary
beneficiary expressly designated in the contract
beneficiary can control details of performance
Discharge of Contractual Obligation
Performance
Failure of a Condition
Contingent/dependent upon a condition (securing financing for a house)
Discharge by supervening illegality
cession enacted law
was not anticipated
Impossibility
unanticipated/extraordinary event (war, wildfires, burning houses)
Objective test
no one can preform
reasonable person
Death, incardination (usually)
are you needed to order to complete the contract
Discharge by impracticability or frustration
Unanticipated event
Performance is extremely difficult or expense
Purpose of K is (nearly) destroyed
Crop failure, embargo, tariffs, war, drought
Discharge by Recission
Both parties agree to cancel or modify K
Recission→ binding contract
Consideration?
Partial discharge by modification
right to sue goes away under all these conditions
breach of contract→ remedies
Breach of contract
Duty to preform
Failure to perform in accordance with contract terms
Material breach
Compensatory damages ($)
Expectation Damages
Reliance Damages
Consequential Damages
Expectation Damages
standard measure
places the plaintiff in the position they would have been in the IF the defendant had performed
Pay enough to be in the same position they would have been in when the contract was supposed to happen
Reliance Damages
Place plaintiff in the position they would have been in had K never been formed
Consequential Damages
Catch all
All the other stuff you spend thinking something is going to happen
Equitable Damages
When legal remedies are inadequate
Specific performance
Recission and Restitution
Quasi-Contract
Specific Performance
Court order to preform K
Subject matter of the K is rare and unique
Usually land cases
Recission and Restitution
non-breacher may cancel the contract
Appropriate when non-breacher has attempted to perform or transferred a “benefit”
Quasi-Contract
“Unjust enrichment” → K was created in the interest of fairness
Must show
Plaintiff conferred a benefit on defendant
Plaintiff has a reasonable expectation of compensation
Defendant will be unjustly enriched
Emergency or prior practice (someone got into a car accident and needed surgery)
UCC
Uniform Commercial Code
Sale of goods
Goods: movable, tangible things
Not real estate, services or intangibles
Good & Services K (contract)
merchant: one who regularly deals in good of kinds sold
UCC Modification to common law
Offer Revocability: merchants written offer is revocable for the stated period or for a reasonable period
Acceptance
Any reasonable manner
no mirror image rule: additional terms ignored
both parties’ merchants": additional terms generally included
Open Terms Allowed
Imply reasonable terms and conditions (Should include quantity)
UCC Warranties
General Seller Warranties
Express warranties
Implied warranties
Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
General seller warrants
passing goods, title, unencumbered by liens and no infringement
Express warranties
express promise, description and sample
implied warranties
goods are “fit” for the ordinary purpose for which such goods are used
implied warranty of fitness for a particular pupose
A: seller knows the purpose for which goods are to be used
B: seller knows buyer is relying on the seller’s judgement
C": buyer relies on sellers’ judgement
Disclaimers
Written, clear, conspicuous language
Magnuson- Mass Warranty Act
governs warrants of consumer goods
deals with disclaimers of warrants
increases consumer confidence