research methods

5.0(1)
studied byStudied by 143 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/127

flashcard set

Earn XP

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

128 Terms

1
New cards

sign test

nominal data, related design, difference

2
New cards

wilcoxon test

ordinal data, related design, difference

3
New cards

related t test

interval data, related design, difference

4
New cards

chi-squared

nominal data, unrelated design, difference

nominal data, correlation

5
New cards

mann whitney

ordinal data, unrelated design, difference

6
New cards

unrelated t test

interval data, unrelated design, difference

7
New cards

spearmans rho

ordinal data, correlation

8
New cards

pearsons rho

interval data, correlation

9
New cards

0.05 level of significance

5% due to chance

95% due to researchers manipulation

prevents type 1 or type 2 error

10
New cards

0.01 level of significance

1% due to chance

99% due to researchers manipulation

causes type 2 error

11
New cards

0.10 level of significance

10% due to chance

90% due to researchers manipulation

causes type 1 error

12
New cards

Variable

Any 'thing' that can vary or change within an investigation. Variables are generally used in experiments to determine if changes in one thing results in changes in another.

13
New cards
Independent variable
The aspect of the experimental situation that is manipulated by the researcher (or changes naturally) so the effect on the DV
14
New cards
Dependent variable
Measured by the researcher. Any effect on the DV should be caused by the change in the IV.
15
New cards
Aim
A general statement of what the researcher intends to investigate; it is the purpose of the study
16
New cards
Hypothesis
A clear, precise, testable statement that states the relationship between the variables to be investigated, and it is stated at the outset of any study
17
New cards
null hypothesis
states there is no difference or relationship between the variables being studied
18
New cards
Directional hypothesis
States the direction of the difference or relationship. Psychologists tend to use a directional hypothesis when the findings of previous research suggest a particular outcome.
19
New cards
Non-directional hypothesis
Does not state the direction of the difference or relationship. Psychologists tend to use a non-directional hypothesis when there is no previous research, or findings from earlier studies are contradictory.
20
New cards
Demand characteristics
Any cue from the researcher or the situation that may be interpreted by the participants as revealing the purpose of the investigation.
21
New cards
Investigator effects
Any effect of the investigator's behaviour (conscious or unconscious) on the (dv) research outcome.
22
New cards
Ethical issues:
These arise when a conflict exists between participants' rights and researchers' needs to gain valuable and meaningful findings
23
New cards
Cost-benefit analysis
The role of ethics committees to make judgements about the costs and benefits involved in carrying out individual pieces of research
24
New cards

descriptive statistics

a way of analysing quantitative data through the use of graphs, tables and summary statistics to identify trends and draw meaningful conclusions

25
New cards

measures of central tendancy

Give us information about the most typical values in a set of data - mean, median, mode

26
New cards

measures of dispersion

Looks at the spread of values, i.e. how far values vary and differ from one another - range, standard deviation

27
New cards
order effects
when the positioning or order of the conditions influences the outcome
28
New cards
Randomisation
The use of chance in order to control for the effects of bias when designing materials and deciding the order of conditions. It is one of the ways to minimise the effect of extraneous or confounding variables on the outcome (controlling for investigator effects)
29
New cards
Standardisation
When exactly the same formalised procedures and instructions are used for all participants in a research study. This ensures all participants are subject to the same environment, information and experience (controlling for investigator effects)
30
New cards
Levels (of the IV)
Different experimental conditions, chosen by the researcher, in order to test the effect of the IV.
31
New cards
Operalisation
When the researcher clearly defines the variables in terms of how they can be measured.
32
New cards
Inter-rater Reliability
the extent to which there is an agreement with two or more observers
33
New cards
test-retest reliability
a method for determining the reliability of a questionnaire or psychological test by assessing the same person on 2 separate occassions (sufficient time needed within the two)
34
New cards
reliability
the consistency of a research or measuring test
35
New cards
Extraneous variables
Variables other than the IV that may affect the DV
36
New cards
participant variables
Any individual differences between participants that may affect the DV
37
New cards
situational variables
Any features of the experimental situation that may affect the DV
38
New cards
Confounding variables
Any variables, other than the IV, that may have affected the DV so we cannot be sure of the true source of changes to the DV.
39
New cards
Participant reactivity
Participants are not passive within experiments and are likely to try and work out what is going on; this is a significant extraneous variable and is very difficult to control.
40
New cards
control condition
the condition that is not exposed to the variable that is changed
41
New cards
experimental condition
the condition that involves exposing the participants to change
42
New cards
Experimental design
The different ways in which the testing of participants can be organised in relation to the experimental conditions. The three types of experimental design are: independent groups, repeated measures and matched pairs.
43
New cards
Independent groups design
Participants are allocated to different groups where each group represents one experimental condition (levels of the IV)
44
New cards
Repeated measures design
All participants take part in all conditions of the experiment
45
New cards
experiment
an investigation where there is manipulation of the independent variable while other variables are tried to be kept constant. Allows a cause and effect relationship to be established
46
New cards

Laboratory Experiments

Take place in HIGHLY CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS. Doesn't necessarily have to be a 'laboratory', just has to be highly controlled. Researcher manipulates the IV and records the effect on the DV.

47
New cards

Field Experiment

Takes place in a natural, more everyday setting. Not literally in a field, in the field. Researcher manipulates the IV and records the effect on the DV.

48
New cards

Natural Experiment

Environment is natural as in field experiments, but also the change in the independent variable is also natural. The IV is not brought about by the researcher; it would have happened even if the researcher was not there.

49
New cards
Quasi Experiment
The IV is based on an existing/natural difference between people (e.g. age, gender, a disorder). No-one manipulates the IV, it just exists. You can't randomly allocate to conditions.
50
New cards
Counterbalancing
An attempt to control for the effects of order in a repeated measures design; half the participants experience the conditions in one order, and the other half in the opposite order. Each condition is tested first or second in equal amounts.
51
New cards
Matched pairs design
Pairs of participants are first matched on some key variable(s) that may affect the DV. One member of each pair is assigned to condition A, and the other to condition B. The data for each matched pair's performance is compared.
52
New cards
validity
the extent to which a test measures what they claim to measure
53
New cards
Internal validity
The degree to which the data and conclusions are considered to reflect the participants or phenomenon's reality
54
New cards
External validity
The extent to which the results and conclusions of a study can be generalised to other settings, populations and times
55
New cards
Informed consent
Involves making participants aware of the aims of the research, the procedure, their rights (including the right to withdraw) and what their data will be used for
56
New cards
Deception
Deliberately misleading or withholding information from participants at any stage of the investigation
57
New cards
Privacy
Participants have the right to control information about themselves
58
New cards

Confidentiality

Our right, enshrined in law under the Data Protection Act, to have any data protected Participants should have the right to control information about themselves but if that's not possible, confidentiality should be maintained.

59
New cards

protection from harm

Participants should leave the experiment in the same state they entered. They should not be subjected to physical or psychological harm, including embarrassment, stress or being placed under pressure.

60
New cards
Debrief
Where participants are made aware of the true aims of the investigation and any other details they were not supplied with during the study
61
New cards
Population
The group of people from whom the sample is drawn
62
New cards
Target population
The group of people that the researcher is aiming to investigate
63
New cards
sample
a group of people who take part in a research investigation - ideally representative of the target population
64
New cards
Opportunity sampling
Consists of taking the sample from people who are available at the time the study is carried out, and fit the criteria you are looking for
65
New cards
Random sampling
A sample in which every member of the target population has an equal chance of being chosen; this involves identifying everyone in the target population and then selecting the number of participants you need in a way that gives everyone in the population an equal chance of being picked
66
New cards
Stratified sampling
Involves classifying the population into categories and then choosing a sample which consists of participants from each category in the same proportions as they are in the target population
67
New cards
Self-selecting / volunteer sampling
Consists of participants becoming part of a study because they volunteered when asked (or in response to an advert)
68
New cards
Systematic sampling
Involves selecting every nth person from the target population, using a predetermined system to select participants
69
New cards
Naturalistic observation
Watching and recording behaviour in the setting within which it would normally occur; all aspects of the environment are free to vary
70
New cards
Controlled observation
Watching and recording behaviour within a structured environment, some variables are managed. There is some control over variables to observe effects and also control over extraneous variables
71
New cards
Covert observation
Participants' behaviour is watched and recorded without their knowledge or consent; participants are unaware they are the focus of a study
72
New cards
Overt observation
Participants' behaviour is watched and recorded with their knowledge and consent; informed consent has been obtained beforehand
73
New cards
Participant observations
The researcher becomes a member of the group whose behaviour they are for watching and recording
74
New cards
Non-participant observations
The researcher remains outside of the group whose behaviour they are watching and recording; this allows the researcher to record behaviour in a more objective manner
75
New cards
Unstructured observation
The observer write down everything they see, producing detailed qualitative data
76
New cards
Structured observation
The observer simplifies the target behaviour by specifying which particular aspects they will be looking for, producing quantitative data
77
New cards
Event sampling
Involves counting the number of times a particular behaviour occurs
78
New cards
Time sampling
Involves recording behaviour within a pre-established time frame
79
New cards
Self-report technique
Any method in which a person is asked to state or explain their own feelings, opinions, behaviours and/or experiences related to a given topic
80
New cards
Questionnaire
A set of written questions used to assess a person's thoughts and/or experiences
81
New cards
Interview
A 'live' encounter (face-to-face or on the phone) where the interviewer asks a set of questions to assess an interviewee's thoughts and/or experiences. The questions may be pre-set (as in a structured interview) or may develop as the interview goes along (unstructured interview)
82
New cards
Open questions
Questions for which there is no fixed choice of response and respondents can answer in any way they wish
83
New cards
Closed questions
Questions for which there is a fixed choice of responses determined by the question setter
84
New cards

Qualitative data

When data is expressed in words and may take the form of a written description of the thoughts, feelings and opinions of participants

85
New cards

Quantitative data

When data is expressed numerically, i.e. in numbers or quantities. This data is open to being statistically analysed and can be converted into graphs, charts etc.

86
New cards
Primary data
Information that has been obtained first hand by the researcher for the purposes of a research project, often gathered directly from participants
87
New cards
Secondary data
Information that has already been collected by someone else, and so pre-dates the current research project. Such data might include the work of other psychologists or government statistics
88
New cards
Meta-analysis
Refers to the process of combining results from a number of studies to make an overall analysis of trends and patterns.
89
New cards
Pilot study
A small scale 'trial-run' of the actual investigation, carried out before the full-scale research project begins (based on a small scale)
90
New cards
Single-blind procedures
Participants may not be told the aim of the experiment (or which condition they are in or whether there is another condition)
91
New cards
Double-blind procedures
Neither the participants nor the researcher who conducts the study is aware of the aims of the experiment. They are an important feature of drug trials
92
New cards
Correlation
Indicates the strength and direction of an association between two or more co-variables (not trying to show cause-and-effect, as there is no manipulation of one variable)
93
New cards

correlational hypothesis

Still has to clearly state the relationship between variables and can be directional or non-directional

There is no IV and DV but the co-variables have to be clearly operationalised

94
New cards

Correlation coefficient ('r'):

A number produced between -1 and +1 after statistical analysis of a correlation. This number represents the direction and strength of a relationship between co-variables.

95
New cards
anomaly
Something that deviates from the normal
96
New cards
Deduction:
The process of deriving new hypotheses from an existing theory
97
New cards
Co-variables
The 'things' that are being measured
98
New cards
alternative hypothesis
a testable statement about the relationship (difference or association) between two or more variables (directional or non directional)
99
New cards
Probability
A numerical measure of the likelihood or chance that certain events will occur. A statistical test gives the probability that a particular set of data did not occur by chance.
100
New cards
Critical value
The numerical boundary or cut-off point between acceptance and rejection of the null hypothesis