1/97
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
critical race theory
developed by legal scholars critiquing racism inherent in the US legal system
argues that pro-diversity efforts won’t matter if racism is hardwired into the system
concerned with structural racism as the root of racist practice
6 tenets of critical race theory
ordinariness
interest convergence
social construction
differential racialization
intersectionality
voice of color
ordinariness
racism is difficult to address or cure bc it’s not acknowledged- it’s just the usual way society does business, and it’s a common, everyday experience of most people of color in the US
interest convergence
because racism advances the interests of the White elite materially and the White working class psychologically, large segments of society have little incentive to eradicate racism
ex: woke-washing - a corporate marketing practice where brands superficially adopt progressive language or social justice themes to boost their image and sales, without implementing genuine, corresponding internal changes or ethical business practices
social construction
race corresponds with no biological or genetic reality; “races” are just categories that society invents, manipulates, and retires when convenient
ex: attempts to define “Black” according to “percents” of “Black blood",” reflected on the US census form, reflect the constructionism
differential racialization
a society considers diff groups racial “Others” at diff times in history depending on that society’s shifting concerns/needs
intersectionality
nobody has a single, easily stated, unitary identity; everyone has potentially conflicting, overlapping identities, loyalties, and allegiances
voice of color
minority status brings with it a unique perspective from which to communicate experiences with racism and relate matters that Whites are unlikely to know; therefore, it’s important these voices be heard
racial idealism
racial equity can be achieved with enough education and pro-diversity efforts
racial realism
racial equity is impossible in a country where White privilege is institutionalized by systems that ignore race
structural racism
the deeply embedded system of laws, policies, and cultural norms that historically and presently advantage white people while disadvantaging people of color
priming, associations, assumptions → history, policies, practices → inequitable outcomes and racial disparities
implicit bias
race is created to justify enslaving people from Africa
policies and practices that consolidate and protect power bestow unearned economic, social, cultural, and political advantage to people called “white,” and unearned disadvantage to people of color
national narrative about people of color being “less than” human justifies mistreatment and inequality
inequitable outcomes and experiences resulting from policy decisions in health, housing, employment, education, and life expectancy - reinforces white supremacist beliefs and ideology
film and racial stereotypes
the protagonist(s) of the film (often a White man in Hollywood cinema) is usually in the center of the frame, and minor characters relegated to the edges
when a White First World hero enters a Third World, he is often surrounded by a larger band of natives, and his immobility often contrasts with the natives’ frenetic activity
ex: Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom
cinematic stereotyping
white people are often shown being chased/threatened by “angry natives”
ex: Pirates of the Caribbean
a white savior helps people of color who are being oppressed by Bad Whites (Hollywood shows racism as an individual failing, not a systematic problem)
ex: The Help, Dancing with Wolves
whitewashing: White people are free to pass as people of color onscreen, but Hollywood less often casts people of color passing as White characters
ex: Dr. Strange, the Lone Ranger
blindcasting: casting without regard for race… however, when people of color take roles typically reserved for White people, they are not usually passing as White
ex: Bridgerton, Thor, Hamilton
other
the people or cultural group(s) against which one defines one’s own self or culture
othering: the process by which this occurs
internalized racism
the result of psychological programming in which a racist society convinces members who do not belong to the hegemonically dominant race that they are inferior to the hegemonically dominant race
colorism/intraracial racism
prejudice or discrimination against individuals with a dark skin tone, typically among people of the same ethnic or racial group
tokenism
making a symbolic or perfunctory effort to be multicultural- in film, inclusion of a supporting character to avoid charges of racism, sexism, homophobia, etc
ex: Stranger Things
cultural separatism
voluntary, full political separation from another cultural/racial group
cultural assimilation
voluntary or involuntary, assumption of another cultural/racial group’s dominant values, behaviors, and beliefs
Irish Americans
Irish men were stereotyped as lazy, drunken, hot-tempered, and working-class
mostly complete assimilation by 1950s
ex: The Quiet Men
Italian Americans
in response to WW2, Italian Americans loudly proclaimed their patriotism and slowly became more accepted and assimilated
ex: Scarface, Shark Tale
Jewish Americans
ex: The Jazz Singer, Annie Hall
other points of racial/ethnic tension
are Middle Easterners “white” or not? media portrayals of those from the Middle East, especially when Muslim, have suffered from Orientalist stereotyping - violent terrorist men, rich sheiks, hypersexualized “harem” women, or downtrodden oppressed submission women
are Latine/Hispanic people “white” or not? media portrayals of Latine and Hispanic characters shift according to the political winds, as we’ll discuss later in class
why does representation matter?
you can’t be what you can’t see
white privilege, black resistance
James Baldwin: when any white man in the world picks up a gun and says: give me liberty or give me death, the entire white world applauds. but when a Black man says exactly same thing, word for word, he’s judged as a criminal (by whites) and treated as one. and everything possible is done to make an example of him to ensure there wouldn’t be anymore like him
ex: Killmonger
timeline
enslaved people’s history in the US is a history of resistance and rebellion- not quiet submission
1619: first indentured servants
1712: NYC Slave Revolt
1739: Stono Slave Revolt in South Carolina
1770: Crispus Attucks, a Black man, is the first casualty of the American Revolution in the Boston Massacre
1800: Richmond (VA) slave rebellion led by Gabriel, an enslaved blacksmith
1807: Great Britain passes law prohibiting international slavery
1808: US passes law prohibiting international slavery (but domestic slavery persists in 11 states)
1831: Nat Turner Slave Rebellion in Virginia
1833: Great Britain abolishes slavery throughout its empire
1836: US House passes “Gag Resolution” prohibiting discussion of anti-slavery petitions in Congress (institutionalized racism and interest convergence)
1857: Supreme Court issues the Dred Scott Decision, allowing slave owners to take their victims into free Western territories; this served to legally affirm that enslaved people were property
1859: White abolitionist John Brown
1861: confederate gov forms; Civil War begins
1862: Emancipation Proclamation
1865: Civil War ends; Confederacy disbanded; “Black Code”; 13th Amendment prohibits slavery
1866: first Civil Rights Act; citizenship regardless of skin color; KKK founded
1868: 14th Amendment makes all formerly enslaved people citizens; John Willis Menard first Black man elected to Congress but denied a seat
1870: 15th Amendment - voting rights to Black men
1896: Plessy v. Ferguson - “separate but equal”
1890s: blackface in early silent films
1903: Uncle Tom’s Cabin film - faithful, happily submissive Black servant
1908: lynch
1909: NAACP formed
1914: WW1 begins
1915: Birth of a Nation
1917: US enters WW1 with a lot of Black soldiers
1914-1920: Great Migration of southern African Americans to northern cities eventually leads to the Harlem Renaissance
1918: Mainstream Hollywood comedies treat Black people somewhat equally
1919: End of WW1
1920: 19th Amendment - women of any race right to vote
1921: Tulsa Race Massacre
1928: Jazz Singer; Heart of Dixie (all black cast)
1929: Great Depression
1930s-1940s: cartoons with racial stereotypes; Oscar Micheaux
1932-1971: Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphillis (institutionalized racism)
1939: first Black actor to win an Oscar for Gone with the Wind
1941: executive order prohibits federal workplace discrimination; US enters WW2
1942: Casablanca; internment of Japanese
1943: Zoot Suit Riot
1945: end of WW1
1954: Brown v. Board of Education - separate but equal
1955: Rosa Parks doesn’t get off bus; Montgomery Bus Boycott
1957: Little Rock School Desegregation Crisis
1963: first Black man to win an Oscar; MLK I Have a Dream
1964: Civil Rights Act passed
1965: Voting Rights Act; Watts Riot
1967: Loving v. Virginia; repealing miscegenation laws
1968: MLK assassinated
1971: blaxploitation
1980s: Black cinema
1990s: hood film
2000s: some begin to wonder whether we need to ask about “Black cinema” anymore; is inclusion now mainstream?
2015: OscarsSoWhite movement
race films
genre starring Black actors, featuring Black life, and designed for Black audiences; many were made, but few have survived, but not deemed “worthy” enough for archival preservation until recently
Latinx
an imperfect term first adopted by US academics and activists
Latine
a somewhat controversial term first adopted by teens in Buenos Aires, Argentina
is there a linguistic power relationship inherent in wanting to degender a language in which genders are “built in”?
do gender-neutral labels ignore the importance of gender as an intersection with race or provide necessary inclusivity?
is it worth using such a broad umbrella terms at all, or do they simply erase individual cultural heritages? What terms would be better?
the Hollywood Assimilation Narrative
a first- or second-generation immigrant protagonist sets out to better themself in the American system
“success” is defined in upwardly mobile, professional, and socioeconomic terms and goes hand-in-hand with mainstream assimilation
the protagonist realizes that mainstream American success is incompatible with their root culture’s values; they must either compromise their ethnic identity to succeed or reject their professional ambitions and honor their culture
Latinx Timeline
1598: Spain settles New Mexico
1781: LA founded by Spaniards, Afro-Latinos, and mestizo settlers from Mexico
1810: Separatist movements begin in Latin American
1821: The Republic of Mexico declares its independence from Spain. the first Anglo settlers are invited into the Mexican state of Texas
1829: Slavery in Mexico is abolished
1834: Mexican President Antonio Lopez Santa Anna dissolves Mexico’s Congress
1836: Santa Anna takes control of San Antonio, TX. Siege of the Alamo
1845: Texas annexed & Mexico upset
1846-1848: Mexican-American war
1859: Cuban workers for cigar factors in NY, LA, Miami
1862: Homestead Act
1868: Cubans revolt
1892: independence movements from Spain in Cuba and Puerto Rico
1896-1898: Spain grants Cuba and Puerto Rico autonomy
1897: Spanish-American War starts when US battleship blows up in Cuban harbor. US acquires Puerto Rico
1901: Platt Amendment
1902: Reclamation Act passed
1904: border patrol
1910: Mexican revolution
1917: Puerto Ricans given US citizenship; Immigration act of 1917: Select Services Act
1939: Grapes of Wrath; braceros; Zoot Suit riots
1958: West Side Story
1959: Fidel Castro takes over Cuba
1962: National Farm Workers Association
1964: Civil Rights Act
1966: Cuban American Adjustment Act
1968: East LA Walkouts/Chicano Blowouts
1974: Equal Educational Opportunity Act
1986: Immigration Reform and Control Act
1994: NAFTA
2003: Latinx becomes nation’s largest minority group
Platt Amendment
limits Cuban independence, reserving right of US to build a naval base on Cuba, forbidding Cuba from signing treaties or borrowing money unless deemed agreeable to the US
Reclamation Act
dispossessing many Hispanic Americans of their lands
Immigration Act of 1917
enforces literacy requirement on all immigrants
Selective Service Act
requiring Mexican immigrants to register for the draft even though they’re not eligible
postcolonial criticism
examines how texts by colonized peoples articulate their identity and reclaim their past
examines how texts by colonizing cultures distort and inscribe the inferiority of a colonized people
examines how texts by colonized peoples articulate their identity and reclaim their past
colonialism
the appropriation of lands, goods, and human resources by foreign nations
denial and destruction of the sovereignty and culture of indigenous peoples
sovereignty: the power of a group to make decisions for itself, free from external control
othering
the other is the culturally determined, less-desirable side of any binary opposition:
male/female
white/black
north/south
rich/poor
straight/queer
abled/disabled
logical/emotional
scientific/superstitious
whether ally or enemy, the inferior Other is never “one of us”
othering may include essentializing and totalizing diverse peoples
colonial ideologies
the colonizer is superior to the colonized
the colonizer has a moral duty to “liberate” the colonized from “backward” beliefs and practices
scientific “proof” or racial hierarchy
colonialist ideologies about ethnic/racial hierarchy were supported by the findings of so-called “sciences” at that time in history… such as craniometry
how is science (or “science”) used to support racist/racially biased policies today
White Man’s Burden
Rudyard Kipling
Noble Savage Myth
Western literary and philosophical construct that romanticizes indigenous or “primitive” peoples as inherently pure, peaceful, and uncorrupted by civilization, representing a “state of nature”
the White Savior Myth
the white man’s burden + the noble savage = white savior
this myth reasserts the superiority of any Westerner-gone-native over actual native peoples
diaspora
the involuntary mass dispersion of a people from their homeland
effects of Western Colonialism
emergence of bourgeoisie classes within the indigenous populations that mimic their colonizers for the sake of advancement
emergence of hybrid societies tense with internal contradictions and split loyalties
boarding schools
investigations of records marked and unmarked graves indicate from 973 to 3,100 American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian children died in federal Indian boarding school between 1819 and 1969
mimicry
when colonial subjects imitate their colonizers to gain acceptance and advantages, or because they believe such mannerisms are superior to their own
assimilation
belief that people should work, live, and succeed according to the practices and beliefs of the superior, dominant culture. can be aggressively enforced to wipe out native cultures
double consciousness
describes the internal conflict experienced by marginalized groups navigating a dominant white society
two souls, two thoughts, two unreconciled strivings
viewing oneself through one’s own eyes and the contemptuous eyes of a racist society, resulting in a fractured identity
decolonization
an ongoing decolonization
at the end of WW2, many nations in Africa and Asia gained independence from European imperialists
lingering effects of colonialism
categorization of the world into “ranks” based on wealth and access to resources - a capitalist interpretation of development and progress
resistance
postcolonial texts (books, music, cinema, etc) may serve as sites of subversion or resistance to the colonizer and to colonial ideologies
hybrid identity
combining and/or negotiating indigenous and colonial identities: integration or bi/multiculturalism
indigenization
when power is returned to indigenous people and indigenous ways of knowing are given equality with Western ways of knowing
neocolonialism
the use of economic political, cultural, or other pressures by a greater power to indirectly other countries or peoples. often associated with the effects of multinational corporations
cultural imperialism
the exportation and promotion of one nation’s cultural artifacts around the globe in ways that replace indigenous artifacts
double colonization
indigenous women simultaneously experience the oppression of colonialism and patriarchy
Native American timeline
1492: Columbus
1637: First reservations established by Puritans near New Haven, CT
1600s: Pequot War
1689-1763: French and Indian War
1756-1763: Seven Years War
1774: Boston Tea Party - Massachusetts patriots dressed as Mohawk Indians protest against British Tea Act
1811: Battle of Tippecanoe
1838: Trail of Tears
1840s-1890s: Crazy Horse, Sitting Bull, Geronimo, Cochise
1890: Wounded Knee Massacre
1902: Cherokee Nation v. Hitchcock
1944: National Congress of American Indians established
1950s: more than 100 tribes are legally terminated
1968: American Indian Movement begins
1969: Alcatraz
1972: Indian Education Act
1973: Occupation & Siege of Wounded Knee
1978: Indian Child Welfare Act
1980: Seminole tribe of FL establishes first tribally owned gaming enterprise ; US v. Sioux Nation of Indians
1996: National American Indian Heritage Month
2008: given royalties
Native American History
2011: seven new saints for Catholic Church, including Hawaii’s Mother Marianne and a 17th century Native American, Caterina Tekakwitha, “Lily of the Mohawks”
2017: Navajo's honored
orientalism
this concept from postcolonial theory addresses the socially constructed binary of “West” vs. “East”
the Christian Occident [West] vs. the Non-Christian Orient [East]
Christianity, starting in the early Roman Christian Empire, began Othering its non-Christian neighbors
![<ul><li><p>this concept from postcolonial theory addresses the socially constructed binary of “West” vs. “East”</p></li><li><p>the Christian Occident [West] vs. the Non-Christian Orient [East]</p></li><li><p>Christianity, starting in the early Roman Christian Empire, began Othering its non-Christian neighbors</p></li></ul><p></p>](https://assets.knowt.com/user-attachments/48cf7880-e42d-4f8a-ba57-71c71f40497e.png)
stereotypes
in the US, the “Oriental” has been systematically portrayed as someone other than American and as a threat to the American family
pollutant- arose mid 1800s California
yellow peril- arose 1900s
model minority- arose 1950s
enemy- arose 1970s
yellowface
a form of caricature that depicts the Asian body as racially opposed to the White
it often includes (primarily in male images), White people cosmetically made up with:
“slanted” eyes
overbite
yellow skin color
facial hair, especially mustache and goatee
round glasses
white people still all too often play characters descent in Hollywood
inscrutable oriental
a derogatory Western stereotype depicting people of East Asian descent as mysterious, stoic, devious, or impossible to understand
model minority
stereotype and social construct portraying certain minority groups - most commonly Asian Americans in the US- most commonly Asian Americans in the US- as inherently more successful, hardworking, and educated than other minority groups
colonialism and women
the colonial rhetoric of moral superiority was based on the construction of colonized Asian women as subjects of sexual desire and fulfillment and European colonial women as the paragons of virtue and the beaters of a redefined colonial morality
stereotypes of women
dragon lady
china doll/geisha/lotus flower
suzie wong
tiger mom
dragon lady
mysterious, dangerous, heartless
China doll/ Geisha/ Lotus Flower
hypersexualized, coy, available
Suzie Wong
hypersexualized, innocent, needs rescuing by a White man
Tiger Mom
uptight, demanding, expects academic and physical perfection in her children
CRT
argues that racism is a normal, everyday part of society, not just isolated acts of prejudice
it is built into institutions (schools, law, housing, jobs, policing)
goes unnoticed by those who benefit from it
race is socially constructed
race is not biological but a social invention created to categorize people and justify unequal treatment
society changes the meaning of race over time to serve political and economic needs
interest convergence
progress for racial minorities usually happens only when it benefits white people too
ex: economic growth, global reputation, political stability
law is not neutral
CRT challenges the idea that the legal system is objective or fair
laws often protect existing power structures and can reinforce inequality even when they claim to promote equality
importance of storytelling and lived experience
CRT values the personal experiences and stories of people of color as legitimate evidence
these narratives reveal how racism works in real life in ways statistics or legal language often hide
critique of colorblindness and liberalism
“I don’t see color”
slow, gradual reform
purely equal treatment without addressing past harm
CRT argues these approaches ignore structural inequality and make real change harder
goal of CRT
CRT is not just a theory but a movement
its goal is to:
expose hidden racism in systems
challenge power structures
work toward genuine racial justice, not just formal equality
liberalism
describes mainstream civil-rights thinking, including:
colorblindness (“treat everyone the same”)
incremental/slow reform
faith in the legal system
individual rights over group remedies
neutrality and objectivity
CRT argues these ideas sound fair but often protect existing inequality
colorblindness can hide racism
CRT says ignoring race does not eliminate racism because:
ppl of color still face unequal starting points
past discrimination still affects housing, education, and wealth
“same treatment” in an unequal system preserves inequality
so colorblindness can freeze injustice in place instead of fixing it
incremental change is too slow
liberalism favors gradual progress through courts and policy
CRT argues:
slow change benefits those already in power
marginalized groups are told to “wait” for justice
deep structural problems need major reform, not small adjustments
rights talk has limits
legal rights can help, but CRT says they:
are fragile and can be taken away
often help individuals but not entire communities
can make people believe the system is fair even when it’s not
sometimes rights are granted symbolically without real material change
neutral laws are not truly neutral
CRT argues that laws:
reflect the values of those who write them
often serve dominant (white, wealthy) interests
can reproduce inequality even without racist language
so “objectivity” in law is often an illusion
group-based solutions may be necessary
because racism affects groups (not just individuals), CRT supports:
affirmative action
race-conscious policies
structural remedies
construction of racial and cultural difference
This section examines how colonial powers historically constructed ideas of race and culture that justified domination.
It explains how European colonial ideology set up binary oppositions such as “civilized/uncivilized” and “self/other,” which were used to rationalize conquest and subjugation.
The chapter shows how such constructions were not neutral descriptions but active ideological tools of power.
race, class, and colonialism
Loomba explores how colonialism was not just about territorial control but also about class and economic hierarchies.
Colonial identities were shaped by overlapping systems of social stratification—colonial subjects were racialized and placed into lower class positions to make exploitation seem “natural” or inevitable.
psychoanalysis and colonial subjects
The chapter engages with psychoanalytic theory to explain the psychological impact of colonial domination.
Concepts such as internalized inferiority and the ways colonized people absorb and reinterpret colonial values are discussed.
This helps explain why colonial power persisted not only through force but through shaping minds and subjectivities.
gender, sexuality, and colonial discourse
Colonial identity wasn’t only racial or economic; gender played a key role.
The chapter shows that colonial power also defined proper gender roles and sexual norms, often portraying colonized men and women in stereotyped, demeaning ways that reinforced Western dominance.
hybridity
Loomba introduces the concept of hybridity—the idea that cultures under colonial rule don’t remain pure but mix and transform each other.
Rather than seeing colonized cultures as stagnant or wholly erased, hybridity emphasizes cultural negotiation, adaptation, and transformation.
post colonial theory
Postcolonial theory is a framework used to analyze the cultural, political, and economic effects of colonialism and imperialism, especially how colonial power continues to shape societies, identities, and knowledge after formal colonial rule ends.
It asks:
How did colonialism shape the way people see themselves and others?
Whose knowledge, history, and voices are valued — and whose are marginalized?
How does colonial power persist in culture, language, media, and institutions today?
core ideas of postcolonial theory
power and knowledge
representation and the “other”
identity and hybridity
language and voice
resistance and agency
gender and colonialism
power and knowledge
Postcolonial theory argues that colonialism worked not only through military or economic control, but through control of knowledge.
European powers represented colonized peoples as inferior, exotic, or backward, which justified domination. These representations became embedded in literature, education, media, and scholarship.
Knowledge is not neutral — it reflects power.
representation and the “other”
Colonized peoples were constructed as the “Other” in opposition to the European “Self.”
Binary oppositions such as:
civilized / savage
rational / emotional
modern / primitive
helped naturalize colonial hierarchy and racism.
identity and hybridity
Colonialism produced hybrid identities — cultures and identities shaped by both indigenous traditions and colonial influence.
Postcolonial theory rejects the idea of “pure” cultures and emphasizes cultural mixing, adaptation, and resistance.
Key concept: Hybridity (often associated with Homi Bhabha)
language and voice
Colonial languages (English, French, Spanish) often became dominant, marginalizing indigenous languages.
Postcolonial theorists ask:
Who gets to speak?
In what language?
Who is heard or silenced?
Writing back in the colonizer’s language can be both a tool of resistance and a source of tension.
resistance and agency
Postcolonial theory challenges the idea that colonized people were passive victims.
It highlights:
Cultural resistance
Anti-colonial movements
Everyday acts of survival and reinterpretation
Colonized subjects actively negotiated and reshaped colonial power.
gender and colonialism
Colonial rule was deeply gendered.
Colonized women were often portrayed as oppressed or exotic to justify intervention, while colonized men were depicted as violent or weak.
Postcolonial feminist theory critiques both colonial patriarchy and Western feminist universalism.
key thinkers of postcolonial theory
Edward Said – Orientalism: how the West constructed the “East” as inferior and exotic
Homi Bhabha – hybridity, ambivalence, mimicry
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak – “Can the Subaltern Speak?” (voice, silence, power)
Frantz Fanon – psychological effects of colonialism, internalized oppression
what postcolonial theory is used for
Analyzing literature, film, and media
Understanding global inequality
Critiquing Western narratives of history and progress
Examining race, migration, nationalism, and identity
Postcolonial theory examines how colonial power continues to shape culture, identity, and knowledge by analyzing representation, resistance, and the lingering effects of imperialism.