- conjunction & disjunction - conditional, converse, inverse, contrapositive - law of detachment & law of syllogism - properties of equality - properties of congruence @izzymosqq
p ∧ q
joined by the word “and”
written as “p and q'“
true when both statements are true
p ∨ q
joined by the word “or”
written as “p or q”
true when at least one of the statements are true
conjunction example ( p ∧ q )
p: there’s 7 days in a week
q: march has exactly 30 days
ANSWER:
there’s 7 days in a week and march has exactly 30 days.
truth value: false; march has 31 days
disjunction example ( p ∨ q )
p: there’s 7 days in a week
q: march has exactly 30 days
ANSWER:
there’s 7 days in a week or march has exactly 30 days.
truth value: true
conditional statement ( p 🠒 q )
read as “if p, then q”
written using “if, then” form
inverse statement ( ~ p 🠒 ~ q )
formed by negating p (hypothesis) & q (conclusion)
converse statement ( q 🠒 p )
formed by switching p (hypothesis) & q (conclusion)
contrapositive statement ( ~ q 🠒 ~ p )
formed by negating and switching p (hypothesis) & q (conclusion)
conditional statement example ( p 🠒 q )
p: it’s valentines day
q: it’s february
ANSWER:
if it’s valentines day, then it’s february
truth value: true
inverse statement example ( ~ p 🠒 ~ q )
p: it’s valentines day
q: it’s february
ANSWER:
if it’s not valentines day, then it’s not february
truth value: false; february 13th
converse statement example ( q 🠒 p )
p: it’s valentines day
q: it’s february
ANSWER:
if it’s february, then it’s valentines day
truth value: false; february 15th
contrapositive statement example ( ~ q 🠒 ~ p )
p: it’s valentines day
q: it’s february
ANSWER:
if it’s not february, then it’s not valentines day
truth value: true
law of detachment
if the hypothesis is true, then the conclusion is true
law of syllogism
allows you to draw a conclusion from 2 conditional statements
conclusion of the first statement is the hypothesis of the second statement
law of detachment example
given: if mark saves $30, then he can buy a new video game. mark saves $30.
conclusion: he can buy the new video game
law of syllogism example
given: if it is saturday, then jake has a baseball tournament. if jake has a baseball tournament, then he will need to pack his lunch.
conclusion: if it is saturday, then he will need to pack his lunch
addition property
if a=b,
then a+c = b+c
subtraction property
if A=B,
then A-C = B-C
multiplication property
if A=B,
then A ⋅ B = B ⋅ C
division property
if A=B,
then A/B = B/C
distributive property
if A(B+C),
then A(B+C) = AB + AC
substitution property
if A=B,
then A may be substituted by b in any expression
reflexive property of =
for any real number A,
A=A (always equals itself)
symmetric property of =
if A=B,
then B=A
transitive property of =
if A=B & B=C,
then A=C
def’n of ≅
if AB ≅ CD,
then CD ≅ AB
def’n of midpoint
if B is the midpoint of AB,
then AB = BC
segment addition postulate
if A, B, and C are collinear points, and B is between A and C,
then AB + BC = AC
def’n of a right angle
an angle measures 90 degrees if and only if it’s a right angle
m∠ = 90 degrees
def’n of complementary angles
two angles are complementary if and only if the sum of their measures is 90 degrees
m∠ 52 + m∠ 38 = 90 degrees
def’n of supplementary angles
two angles are supplementary if and only if the sum of their measures is 180 degrees
m∠ 102 + m∠ 88 = 180 degrees
def’n of an angle bisector
an angle bisector divides an angle into 2 equal parts
def’n of perpendicular
perpendicular lines form right angles
angle addition postulate
m∠ ABD + m∠ DBC = m∠ ABC
vertical angles theorem
if 2 angles are vertical, they they are congruent
complement theorem
if 2 angles form a right angle, then they are complementary
linear pair theorem (supplement theorem)
if 2 angles form a linear pair, then they are supplementary
congruent complements theorem
if 2 angles are complementary to the same angle, then they are congruent
if ∠ A is complementary to ∠ B, and ∠ C is complementary to ∠ B,
then ∠ A ≅ ∠ C
congruent supplements theorem
if 2 angles are supplementary to the same angle, then they are congruent
if ∠ A is supplementary to ∠ B and ∠ C is supplementary to ∠ B,
then ∠ A ≅ ∠ C
∠ 4 = ∠ 5 are supplementary
linear pair theorem
∠ 4 + ∠ 5 = 180
def’n of supplementary angles
m ∠ ABC = 90 degrees
def’n of a right angle
m ∠ 1 + m ∠ 3 = m ∠ ABC
angle addition postulate