Evaluative Conditioning (Week 9)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/25

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering key terms and concepts from Week 9 lecture on Evaluative Conditioning.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

26 Terms

1
New cards

Evaluative Conditioning

Conditioning of likes and dislikes to neutral stimuli by pairing them with already liked or disliked stimuli; shapes attitudes toward objects like food or music.

2
New cards

Conditioned Stimulus (CS) in EC

A neutral stimulus that becomes liked or disliked after being paired with a valenced unconditioned stimulus.

3
New cards

Unconditioned Stimulus (US) in EC

A stimulus with inherent positive or negative valence used to pair with the CS to influence the CS's evaluation.

4
New cards

Positive US

A positively valenced stimulus used to make the CS more liked when paired with it.

5
New cards

Negative US

A negatively valenced stimulus used to make the CS more disliked when paired with it.

6
New cards

CS + Positive US → CS Liked

Rule: pairing a CS with a positive US increases the CS's liking.

7
New cards

CS + Negative US → CS Disliked

Rule: pairing a CS with a negative US decreases the CS's liking.

8
New cards

EC vs Classical Conditioning

EC changes the evaluation/attitude toward the CS rather than eliciting a primary reflex; classical conditioning targets reflexes.

9
New cards

Picture-Picture Paradigm

Levey & Martin (1975) method: rate paintings as liked/neutral/disliked, pair neutral pictures with liked/disliked ones (20 pairings), then rate again to observe changes in liking.

10
New cards

Mere Exposure

Exposure to stimuli increases liking, even without explicit pairing with a valenced US (often used in advertising).

11
New cards

Visual Domain (Levey & Martin, 1975)

EC demonstrations using pictures/paintings to show changes in liking across a visual domain.

12
New cards

Razran (1954) Early Demonstrations

Early studies showing conditioned evocation of attitudes to verbal stimuli (e.g., Make love, not war) rather than physiological responses.

13
New cards

Gustatory Domain (Zellner, 1983)

EC with flavored teas; CS+ with sugar vs CS- plain; measuring preference ratings for teas.

14
New cards

Baeyens (1990) Fruit Flavours

Fruit-flavour EC study using CS+ flavour+sugar vs CS- flavour alone; discusses why positive shifts can be less reliable due to valence perception and biases.

15
New cards

Todrank (1995) Cross-modal Domain

EC across modalities by pairing odors with faces; assess changes in face liking after pairings.

16
New cards

Biologically Significant USs

USs that are biologically important (e.g., shock); EC can involve second-order stimuli; less common due to confounds; affective priming used as indirect measure.

17
New cards

Affective Priming Task

Indirect EC measure: a prime precedes the target; faster responses when prime and target share valence.

18
New cards

Extinction (De Houwer et al., 2000)

Extinction procedure showing how CS valence reduces after CS-US pairings are diminished or omitted.

19
New cards

Statistical Contingency (Baeyens et al., 1993)

Examines effects of perfect vs partial CS-US contingencies on acquisition and testing; includes CS Composite conditions.

20
New cards

Contingency Awareness (Field, 2000)

Awareness of the CS–US relationship (contingency awareness) and/or the experiment's hypothesis (demand awareness); awareness not always necessary for EC.

21
New cards

Counterconditioning (Baeyens et al., 1989)

Acquisition with CS-US followed by conditioning CS with an opposite US to reverse CS valence; test and extinction phases.

22
New cards

Postacquisition Revaluation (Baeyens et al., 1992)

Revaluing the US after acquisition can alter the CS valence upon re-test.

23
New cards

Conceptual-Categorisation Account (Davey, 1994)

EC as concept learning: CS contains likeable/unlikeable elements; pairing highlights US-congruent features leading to recategorisation rather than valence change.

24
New cards

Holistic Account (Martin & Levey)

EC as a basic form of learning with a holistic CS–US representation; includes US valence and explains resistance to extinction and certain revaluation results.

25
New cards

Sensory Preconditioning (Hammerl & Grabitz, 1996)

Weakness of holistic account: CS1–CS2 training followed by CS2–US can produce CS1 effects, showing preconditioning effects.

26
New cards

Referential Account (Baeyens, 1992)

EC involves referential (signal/expectancy) learning: valence changes to the CS reflect associative expectations, not just a simple reflex.