1/83
AP Psychology
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Behavioral perspective
Psychological approach studying behavior as impacted by the environment
Classical conditioning
Associative learning where one previously meaningless object/event becomes associated with a naturally occurring behavior
Neural stimulus
A previously meaningless thing, the thing that will become paired with the unconditioned response.
Ex: the bell
Unconditioned stimulus
Something that naturally produces a behavior, instinctual
Ex: the food
Unconditioned response
Automatic response due to the unconditioned stimulus (innate)
Ex: salivating
Conditioned stimulus
Called acquisition
NS is considered the CS when the NS and UCS are paired.
UCS no longer has to be present
Ex: the bell
Conditioned response
Behavior in response to the now-paired CS
Same as UCR but the new stimulus triggers it
Ex: salivating
Acquisition
The stage where the NS is now paired with the CR after being paired with the UCR many times
In the CS stage
Higher/second order conditioning
Pairing another neural stimulus with the already paired conditioned stimulus.
Ex: Getting bit = afraid of dog AND dog barking sound
Extinction
Process of weakening or eliminating a learned behavior by withholding the UCS
Spontaneous recovery
Resurface of the previously extinguished CR after a period of time
Stimulus discrimination
Distinguishing between learned (similar) stimuli
Ex: if dogs only salivated to the exact bell tone used in the study
Stimulus generalization
Responding to similar stimuli to the CS
Ex: dogs salivating when they heard all bells
Biological preparedness
Our bodies are divas and are more likely to make connections if they affect our survival.
Taste aversion learning (“Garcia Effect”)
We avoid foods we’ve associated with sickness (yeah, shocker)
Operant conditioning
Consequences and rewards, pair after the behavior happened
Law of Effect
Woah, groundbreaking, earthshaking discovery
Punished behaviors= less frequent, rewarded behaviors= more frequent
Skinner box
Bar/key animal can press to get a reward
To study frequencies
(Crazy! Not animal abuse this time, I’m so proud)
Little Albert Experiment
Aka child abuse!
Watson makes a loud noise every time the baby reached for a rat, so baby associated the rat with a loud noise and starts hating all fuzzy animals (stimulus generalization)
Shaping
Slooooooooowwwwllllyyyyyyy reinforcing succeeding approximations (behaviors getting closer to the one you want)
Instinctive drift
Learners drifting back to instinctual behavior instead of the learned one (probably because they stopped getting rewards- JIPPED!!)
Primary reinforcers
Naturally satisfies an instinctive need
Secondary reinforcers
We learned that we need it, and NOW we want it. (Like money and stuff)
Positive reinforcement
Adding something to increase a behavior (giving a treat)
Negative reinforcement
Taking something away to increase a behavior (removing a grounding)
Positive punishment
Adding something to decrease behavior (spray bottle)
Negative punishment
Taking something away to decrease behavior (taking a phone)
Continuous reinforcement
Get a reward every time a specific behavior is presented (if you’re using treats, that kid’s gonna be a little chubby)
Intermittent reinforcement schedules
Give a reward sometimes when a specific behavior is presented (MAN I would hate that…)
Fixed-ratio
Reward after behavior has been done a certain amount of times
Has a high response rate
Variable-ratio
Reward behavior after an unpredictable amount of times
Steady level of behavior
Fixed-interval
Reward after a set amount of time
Low amount of desired behavior until it nears the time of the reward
Variable-interval
Reward after a random amount of time
Steady level of behavior
Token economy
Teaching method where learners get tokens to cash in for a prize later
Cognitive psychology
Bring thinking back into psych (1960’s)
Learning occurs as a result of thinking, problem solving, memory, and intelligence
We don’t mindlessly react to our environment
Latent learning
Subconscious learning despite no reward
Cognitive maps
Remembering information about our surrounding despite not being rewarded
Social learning theory/observational learning
We learn by modeling/imitating
Some people are more likely to influence us than others
Bobo doll experiment
Training if modeled aggression translates to kids
Control: Did not witness adult being aggressive to the doll
Experimental: Did witness
Albert Bandura
Vicarious learning
Learning about consequences of actions despite not experiencing them yourself
Insight learning
Sudden realization of a problem’s solution
Brain keeps thinking about a problem even if you aren’t aware
Interacting with environment
Learned helplessness
Loss of motivation because you believe yourself unable to control the outcome, even if that changes
Shuttle box
Experiment that discovered learned helplessness
Martian Seligman
Shocking dogs where they can’t move, when moved to a location they can move, they don’t (Say it with me, ANIMAL ABUSE!)
Concept
Mental categories for objects, experiences, ideas
Prototype
The most typical/stereotypical thing in our concept- mental image
Trial and error
Random guessing, no reasoning
Algorithm
Methodical way to test things- will always find answer
Heuristic
Shortcut through an algorithm based on previous success
Intuition
Gut feeling- effortless, automatic
Representative heuristic
What fits our prototype
Availability heuristic
Things more available or important in our memory makes us think they occur more than they do
Priming
Unconscious influence of the environment on a persons thoughts or behaviors
Framing
People’s behaviors are influenced by the way info is presented
Belief perserverance
Keeping hold of beliefs despite evidence to the contrary or disproving
Mental set
Tendency to solve problems in a way that has been successful in the past
Functional fixedness
Inability to think of new uses for familiar objects
Gambler’s fallacy
Thinking past events influence future probability
Sunk-cost fallacy
Welp, i’ve already spent time/money on this crap, might as well keep going!
Compliance
Changing behavior due to a direct request
Central route to persuasion
Logic, stats getting you to do something. Works on educated people, older people, people motivated to make a change in their life
Periphery route to persuasion
Emotions, celebrities, gimmicks or superficial arguments. (creates halo and physical attractiveness affect)
Works on kids, uneducated people… used in politics
Halo effect
Celebrities create- peoples opinions of them spill over into the product they endorse
Mere-exposure effect
Repetition of something turns it likeable (hated a song, repeated so many times brain sees it as ‘safe’ and therefore likes it)
Foot-in-the-door
Ask for small thing to build relationship then as for big one
Door-in-the-face
Ask for unreasonable request to make your real, smaller one, sound better
Low balling
Attractive offer, terms change after a deal is made. (lets go shopping, 5 mins, only one store… but now this one, and this one, and this one too)
That’s-not-all
More and more incentives to buy piled on (usually with time pressure)
Fear-then-relief
Ooooh nooo Mom, you guys are going out… you would’’t want me to be all alone and scared! Luckily for you, __ can stay over.
Make the person fearful then present a solution (fear creates irrational decisions)
Phoneme
Smallest unit of sound- not syllable or letters. (Ch)(individual letters)(ck)
About 45 different phonemes in English
Morpheme
Smallest break up of words that still have meaning (root, prefix, suffix)
Syntax
Order of words in a sentence
Semantics
The literal meaning of a sentence
Overgeneralization
Often kids, applying grammatical rules too broadly (ex: she hitted me)
Language acquisition device (LAD)
Noam Chomsky
We are biologically hardwired to pick up language, especially as kids. Helps explain universal grammar.
Broca’s area
Frontal lobe. Controls the muscles necessary to speak. Only one, in left hemisphere
Wernike’s area
Temporal lobe. Understanding language. Only one, in left hemisphere
Broca’s aphasia
Damage to Broca. Inability to speak fluently- putting thoughts into words. Speech is broken.
Wernikie’s aphasia
Wernikes is damaged. Inability to understand speech, will speak in long incoherent sentences
Linguistic relativity
Theory that structure of a language influences how the speaker thinks of the world
Ivan Pavlov
Bell experiment. Discovered classical conditioning
John B Watson
Little Albert experiment
BF Skinner
Founder of operant conditioning (Behaviorist)
Albert Bandura
Bobo doll experiment. Created socio-cognitive perspective
Martian Seligman
Doggy abuse learned helplessness experiment.