The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Fallacies

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/19

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering key terms and definitions related to the pragma-dialectical approach to fallacies.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards

Pragma-dialectical approach

A framework for understanding fallacies as violations of the standards for critical discussion in argumentative discourse.

2
New cards

Fallacy

A misstep in reasoning that violates the rules of a critical discussion, hindering resolution of differences in opinion.

3
New cards

Code of conduct

A set of standards that governs reasonable argumentative discourse, outlining the rules for critical discussion.

4
New cards

Freedom Rule

The rule that states discussants may not prevent each other from putting forward or questioning standpoints.

5
New cards

Obligation to Defend Rule

Discussants who propose a standpoint must defend it when requested.

6
New cards

Standpoint Rule

Attacks must be directed at a standpoint that has been actually put forward by another participant.

7
New cards

Relevance Rule

Arguments must relate directly to the standpoint they defend and cannot rely on irrelevant or extraneous points.

8
New cards

Validity Rule

Implicit reasoning in an argument must be logically sound and fully articulated.

9
New cards

Argument Scheme Rule

Defenses of standpoints must use appropriate argument schemes correctly.

10
New cards

Concluding Rule

Inconclusive defenses must not result in maintaining doubts, while conclusive defenses should confirm the standpoint.

11
New cards

Language Use Rule

Participants must avoid unclear or ambiguous formulations and not misinterpret each other's statements.

12
New cards

Strategic maneuvering

A tactic in argumentative discourse that balances rhetorical effectiveness with maintaining reasonableness.

13
New cards

Problem-solving validity

The ability of argumentative rules to effectively resolve differences of opinion on their merits.

14
New cards

Conventional validity

The acceptance of the argumentative standards by those engaged in the discourse as appropriate.

15
New cards

Argumentum ad verecundiam

An argument that improperly appeals to authority to support a standpoint.

16
New cards

Argumentum ad populum

An appeal to the emotions of the masses rather than reason or evidence.

17
New cards

Argumentum ad hominem

A fallacy that involves attacking the person rather than the argument.

18
New cards

Argumentum ad baculum

A fallacy that relies on threats or intimidation to gain compliance.

19
New cards

Argumentum ad consequentiam

An argument that concludes a descriptive proposition based on its predicted consequences.

20
New cards

Exploiting hidden fallaciousness

A tactic where fallacies are disguised to appear reasonable to avoid detection.