1/28
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
what is a population’s distribution?
the spatial pattern in which individuals are dispersed within a given area. varies with time, available resources, and intent
what are the three types of spatial distribution?
clumped
uniform
random
clumped distribution
includes family and social groups and other group types
pros: many eyes to search for food, confuse predators with sheer numbers, cooperative hunting
uniform distribution
common among territorial animals defending scarce resources or defending breeding grounds
pros: helps ensure adequate resources for each individual
random distribution
rare, exhibited in individuals that do not form social groups
occurs when resources are not scarce enough to require territorial spacing or cooperative behaviour
pros: not resource limited, no need to attract or repel
types of groups: protective groups
individuals associating intermittently to reduce environmental stress. minimizes individual exposure
eg huddling for warmth
types of groups: feeding groups
use the same food resource at the same time
passive or active aggression
types of groups: foraging groups
search and hunt together
types of groups: breeding groups
formation of breeding units
types of groups: group defense
collectively defend / detect from biotic factors
types of groups: social groups
individuals of the same species that remain and interact with one another to a distinctly greater degree than with other conspecific orgnisms
reasons why to form groups
protect from physical factors and/or predators
assemble the sexes for reproduction
efficient searching for food, habitats, breeding sites
social (kin association - cooperation and altruism)
why dont all animals form groups?
competition for resources
Increased risk of parasitism or disease
Increased conspicuousness
Increased opportunities for reproductive interference or suppression
inbreeding
theres lots of examples in the ppt, make sure to check it out
benefits of group living for prey
Dilution effect
Confusion Effect
Many Eyes Hypothesis
Cooperative Defense
1) Dilution of individual risk
within a group, each individual has a reduced probability of being attacked by a predator
predator is likely to take someone else
not all individuals within a group experience equal risk
selfish herd theory
Group members appear to coordinate defense, but each individual behaves selfishly
Individuals approach others to reduce their domain of danger
Individuals in the middle enjoy lower risk
Individuals on periphery have higher risk as they are more likely to encounter predator first
Tradeoff: Exterior positions may be better for foraging
exceptions to the selfish herd theory
best position may depend on predator’s hunting strategy
dominants protect weaker individuals
dominants choose peripheral locations (muskox)
2) confusion and cocktail party effects
Predators may hesitate or become confused when confronted with several prey items simultaneously
Occurs as a result of limited information processing ability of predators - processing spatial information of multiple targets declines when prey aggregate
Regardless of attack technique, in larger group sizes predators had difficulty focusing on a single target.
3) enhanced detection of predators - the many eyes hypohthesis
Many individuals, each with their own finite probability of detecting an approaching predator, increase the overall probability of a predator being detected
increase overall probability of avoidance or escape
enhances overall vigilance
the many eyes hypothesis assumes:
Individuals in a group monitor the alert behaviour of other individuals in the group.
Individuals detecting predator will actively or passively alert other group members
4) cooperative defence
approach and harass en masse to deter predators
makes defencive formations to protect individuals
why does cooperative defense deter predators?
confuses predators
pronouncement of vigilance
stress or risk of physical injury
alert others to predator’s presence
teach offspring to recognize predators
benefits of grouping to predators / foragers
Information transfer
Cooperative strategies
Catch difficult prey
1) information transfer
Organisms living in groups can benefit from observing successful foragers
Forager joins group to acquire information about food availability, location, and/or predator risk
By observing foraging success of others in the group, a naïve forager can estimate the quality of a food patch
2) cooperative strategies
Animals may cooperate to trap elusive prey, or in taking down larger prey.
Permits capture of prey larger than possible by singletons.
Coordinated effort also involves subsequently protecting the kill from scavengers
Social bonds derived from kinship or mating may enhance cooperation.
3) catching difficult prey
coalition - a short-term association that forms in competitive situations.
Two or more animals may cooperate to defeat or steal from another individual or to secure a resource
optimal group size
Adaptation to maximize energy intake by reducing search & handling times and/or predation risks
In small groups, an individual’s ‘fitness’ may increase with group size, because the sum of benefits are increasing.
leads to optimality in group size (no further advantage to expanded group)
when is an intermediate group size not optimal?
for prey: small groups are not conspicuous and very large groups dilute predation risk
for predators: when prey are scarce: hunt alone – take small prey & don’t need to share, OR form larger group to cooperatively search & take down large prey
mechanisms to keep group size optimal:
Established group members may repel joiners (cost of aggression can’t be too high)
When joiners and group members are genetically related, the group size is predicted to be closer to the optimal value (kin are good to group with, but too large leads to inbreeding)
Movements occur from one group to another group by single foragers aiming to maximize their expected fitness (intergroup movement leads to breakdown of the larger group)