qualitative data
non numerical data, opinions and thoughts from a subjective experience
quantitative data
numerical data: scores, scales ranks, etc
Advantages of qualitative data
more in depth and detailed
providing a better insight into ops or individual experiences
disadvantages of qualitative data
time consuming
difficult to analyse
subjectivity and lacks generalisation
advantages of quantitative data
easy to compare and analyse
objective
disadvantages of quantitative data
lacks detail
a descriptive stat that doesn't tell you why
primary data
information collected for the specific purpose at hand
secondary data
information that already exists somewhere, having been collected for another purpose
advantages of primary data
fit for purpose
increased validity and reliability
disadvantages of primary data
time consuming
needs to be reviewed before publication
advantages of secondary data
quick and easy to access
already been peer reviewed
disadvantages of secondary data
lacks validity (unable to check methods)
nominal data
qualitative values - usually tallied - not able to rank
ordinal data
scaled or ranked data, will be subjective, often seen as score
interval data
ranked data with equal measurement intervals
ratio data
same as interval data but has an absolute zero
central tendency
any measure of the average value in a dataset
Most common measures of central tendency
mean, median, mode
dispersion
Any measure of the spread or variation in a set of scores
most common measures of dispersion
range and standard deviation
bar chart
nominal data only (separated bars)
Histogram
continuous data (ordinal, interval, ratio)
no gaps needed between bars
contingency table
raw scores displayed in columns and rows
scatter graph/scattergram
provides a good visual picture of the relationship between 2 variables
negatively skewed distribution
more values are concentrated on the right side (e.g mean, median, mode)
positively skewed distribution
more values are concentrated on the left side (mode, median, mean)
normal distribution
mean, median, and mode are all the same/very close to one another
probability
likelihood that a particular event will occur
between 0 and 1
psychologists typically use this significance level
p<0.05
when challenging well known theories psychologists tend to adopt this significance level
p<0.01
Proof
doesn't exist in psychology unless 100% accuracy is found
Type 1 error
False Positive; Rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true
Type 2 error
False Negative; Accepting the null hypothesis when it is false
The mnemonic to remember the test table
Carrots Should Come, Mashed With Swede, Under Roast Potatoes
Why referencing is important
enables the reader to track down the sources used
can avoid plagiarism
gives the authors the credit
Harvard referencing order
Author, Year, Title, Edition, Place, Publisher