1/8
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
R v Kemp
Any condition that affects the mind can be a disease of the mind (eg diabetes)
M'naghten case
Insanity requires proof of a defect of reason, disease of the mind and D must not know the nature and quality of their act or that the act was wrong
R v Clarke
Ability to reason must be defective, not merely unused
R v Burgess
Insanity caused by an internal factor can be prone to reoccur and transient (for a short time.)
R v Hennessy
Lack of insulin meant internal diabetes was cause of defect of reason - insane automatism
R v Quick
Lack of food after insulin meant external diabetes was the cause of defect of reason - sane automatism
R v Windle
Saying "they'll hang me for this" showed he knew his actions were legally wrong
Insanity Checklist
- Defect of reason
- Disease of the mind
- Did not know nature and quality of act or did not know act was wrong
What type of defence is insanity?
General defence with a special verdict - ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’