Results for "Values-Norms"

Flashcards

Skip to main content CloseBlackboard Learn NOMTHANDAZO DLADLA Activity Courses Calendar Messages Grades Tools Sign Out Privacy Terms Accessibility Menu Courses Skip to main content 2025_SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE 1 Course Faculty Ms. LINDI MANDA Instructor Details & Actions Course Description View the course description Progress Tracking On Class Collaborate Join session Attendance View your attendance Books & Tools View course & institution tools Course Content × LEARNING UNIT 1: INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE People cannot, not connect Introduction The Social intelligence (SI) study is geared towards equipping learners to acquire the ability to cope well with others and sharpen their interpersonal practical skills (situational awareness, presence, authenticity, clarity and empathy [S.P.A.C.E.]) in order to succeed effectively in various settings (Albrecht 1930). The holistic model - S.P.A.C.E. used in this study is for outlining, determining, and advancing SI at personal level, and it‘s shared to offer guidelines on using it as an effective diagnostic formula and developmental tool for professional and personal success. This is customized from Karl Albrecht‘s work on Social Intelligence. S.P.A.C.E. – As a different kind of smart refers to: S – Situational awareness: knowledge of, attentive to and wise about various contexts and the stimuli they exert and the reactions that arise from such stimuli P - Presence: the manner in which a person affects individuals or groups through physical appearance, mood and demeanour, and body language and how he/she occupies space in an environment A – Authenticity: honesty and sincerity C – Clarity: ability to express one‘s thoughts, opinions, ideas, and intentions clearly; comprehension of the power of languages as a medium of thought and expression; and to use language in ways that meet their needs E – Empathy: ability to be truly aware and considerate of other peoples by tuning their feelings to those of the affected persons. Some questions that arise out of all this are: 1. Where does the concept of social intelligence fit into the field of engineering? 2. How does it apply in an engineer‘s job? 3. How does it apply to the way people work together? 4. Does it apply to the way teams accomplish their missions, to the way employees serve clients, and/or the ways in which bosses and employees interact? 5. Does it apply more broadly across the ―society‖ that exists in every established organization? This module consists of the two parts: Topic 1: Introduction to Social Intelligence It offers a theoretical background to social intelligence in general Topic 2: Social Intelligence and Engineering A discussion of social intelligence broadly built around interactive activities for students to develop the relevant 21st century graduate‘s skills. Introduction to Social Intelligence While you‘re born with your own intelligence or IQ, Social Intelligence is mostly learned. It is considered as the capacity to know oneself, others and things around them. SI develops from experience with others and learning from occurrences, mishaps and successes in social settings. Simply, social intelligence can be regarded as what‘s known as ―tact‖ or ―common sense‖ or even ―street marts.‖ While societies put a huge focus on book smarts and IQ, what‘s often overlooked is that, people‘s lives are largely influenced by their relationships with one another. Mistakenly, many still believe that a measurement of one‘s smartness is through books. Contrary, research has revealed that true intelligence isn‘t only about books smart but also about street smarts. Along with this; it has also been determined that building strong social relationships is worth the effort because of various benefits including the following: · Good relationships are effective for a person because they help to boost their immune system and therefore, assist in combating diseases. · Whenever one has healthy relationships, they will always have to talk to and so, help them deal with major sources of stress, health problems and depression which can be associated to loneliness and poor relationships. · Individuals‘ daily lives are affected by the relationships they have with their significant others, such as boyfriends, spouse, children, parents, colleagues and friends. There are various perspectives on social intelligence and two dominant views are of psychometric and personality, of which are contrary on many crucial points, such as comparative assessment of individuals, but they later agree in recent work on the development of social intelligence (for reviews, see Greenspan, 1979; Greenspan, 1997). Nevertheless, that is beyond the scope of this module. Here, the concentration is on helping students develop as possible as they can, rather than turning them into SI‘s experts. 1.1 The Nature of Social Intelligence The origin of its definition is traced back in 1920 to the psychologist, Edward Thorndike who claimed that it is ―the ability to understand and manage men and women and girls, to act wisely in human relations.‖ Later in the 1930s Moss and Hunt argued that social intelligence is ―the ability to get along with others.‖ Along with this, Vernon in 1930s also described it as being ―reflected in the general ability to get along with people in general, social technique or ease in society, knowledge of social matters and susceptibility to stimuli from other members of a group, as well as insight into the temporary moods or underlying personality traits of strangers.‖ Thus, according to these authors, social intelligence bears both the cognitive features (the ability to understand people) and practical features (ability to deal with and respond towards them). However, social intelligence is often confused with various intelligences such as emotional intelligence, collective intelligence or group intelligence. Perhaps, this influenced the follow up work by Gardner in the 1980s which looked at the model of multiple intelligences with intrapersonal and interpersonal as part of them. Accordingly, he argued that ―social intelligence allows people to take advantage of the resources of others. We are finding that much of people‘s effective intelligence is, in a sense, outside the brain. This means, you can use intelligence for other people, if you know how to reach it and how to use it. Therefore, the best strategy is to mobilize other people around you.‖ Gardner purported that interpersonal intelligence covers the ability to read other people‘s moods, motives and other mental states; and intrapersonal includes the ability to access and assess one‘s own feelings and to draw on them to guide behaviour. He also viewed as the basis of emotional intelligence (EI) with a greater focus on cognition and understanding than feeling. According to Ford and Tisak, social intelligence (SI) has both convergent and divergent validity, as a better predictor of behavioural measure of social effectiveness than academic intelligence. A glaring common agreement is that SI is the ability to effectively plan and direct complicated social relationships and social realities in various environments. Honeywill suggests that it can also be regarded as is ―an aggregated measure of self and social-awareness, evolved social beliefs and attitudes and a capacity and appetite to manage complex social change.‖ Along this, Nicholas Humphrey claimed that SI defines human beings more than quantitative intelligence. In support, Gerdner indicated that SI is equivalent to interpersonal intelligence and also closely related to theory of mind. Combined proponents of SI agreed that it is distinct from general intelligence and may serve as a better predictor of behaviour. According to Zaccaro et al (1990) socially-intelligent individuals are aware of the social situation, including the problems and needs of others (social perceptiveness). They are also able to behave appropriately for different social situations (behavioral flexibility). Thus, these aspects can be seen through a) Social understanding and b) Situational-appropriate behaviour. Along with this, Kosmitzki and John described a socially intelligent person as the one who: · Understands people‘s thoughts, feelings and intentions well; · Is good at dealing with people; · Has extensive knowledge of the rules and norms in human relations; · Is good at taking the perspective of other people; · Adapts well in social situations; · Is warm and caring; and · Is open to new experiences, ideas and values. While embracing social intelligence, Salovey and Mayer in their work considered emotional intelligence as a part of social intelligence. According to them, it includes the ability to monitor feelings and emotions of themselves and others. It is the ability to distinguish between signals and use this information to manage thoughts and actions of others. Social intelligence is the ability to use emotional intelligence in social situations. It incorporates interaction with others and readiness to estimate the social situation around. However, Boyatzis and Sala purported that the problem in calling Social Intelligence as ‗intelligence‘ was to test it on the criteria of ‗intelligence‘. These researchers highlighted that, it had to be classified as an ‗intelligence‘, a concept should be: 1. Behaviourally observable 2. Related to biological and in particular neural-endocrine functioning. That is, each cluster should be differentiated as to the type of neural circuitry and endocrine system involved 3. Related to life and job outcomes 4. Sufficiently different from other personality constructs so that the concept adds value to understanding the human personality and behaviour 5. The measures of the concept, as a psychological construct, should satisfy the basic criteria for a sound measure, that is show convergent and discriminant validity. Accordingly, Goleman addressed this call by looking through biological research and focused on the neural endocrine functioning regards social intelligence. As a result, in his work he highlights that social intelligence is explains in terms of neurology and this fulfils Boyatsi‘s and Sala‘s need for social intelligence to qualify as an intelligence. Additionally, Albrecht expanded the research on multiple intelligences and identified that human beings have six basic dimension of intelligence. Among these, social intelligence is one of them, defined as ―Interacting successfully with others in various contexts‖, with a close term Emotional Intelligence defined as ―Self-insight and the ability to regulate or manage one‘s reactions to experience‖. In addition, Seal et al claimed that the term was defined as the behavioural manifestations of the interpersonal awareness of others‘ emotions, needs, thoughts, and perceptions as well as navigate the larger social environment and working with others. Goleman (2006) and Boyatzis and Goleman (2006) reclassified their array of competencies and clusters into two distinct aspects. The interpersonal clusters (social awareness and relationship management) were relabeled social intelligence (SI) competencies; and the intrapersonal clusters (self-awareness and self- management) were relabeled emotional intelligence(EI) competencies. The new term, emotional and social intelligence (ESI) helps to differentiate the behavioral manifestations of the intrapersonal awareness and management of emotions within the self (EI) from the behavioral manifestations of the interpersonal awareness of others’ emotions, needs, thoughts, and perceptions as well as navigate the larger social environment and working with others (SI). This integrated concept of ESI offers more than a convenient framework for describing human dispositions—it offers a theoretical structure for the organization of personality and linking it to a theory of action and job performance. This helped it get positioned as a competency as well. As, according to Boyatzis, a competency is an ―underlying characteristic of the person that leads to or causes effective or superior performance‖ therefore, an ESI competency got defined as an ability to recognize, understand, and use emotional information about oneself (EI) or others(SI) that leads to or causes effective or superior performance. The correlation of social and emotional intelligence approach is clearly reflected by Bar-On, who uses the concept of emotional and social intelligence. This model includes set of interrelated emotional and social competencies that determine how effectively we understand and express ourselves, how we understand and get along with other people and how we handle daily activities. In practice, they can complement each other as they complement to the abstract intelligence. Human being is a solid personality whose career is hardly separable from personal or family life. Emotional intelligence is essential for human life, because it helps to perceive, understand and manage emotions. It represents a personal, natural wisdom that allows him to live life joyfully, to overcome and solve everyday problems and achieve success. Social intelligence is the ability to relate to people, perceive social situations and properly interpret them and react accordingly. It is the ability to create harmonious interpersonal relationships and the ability to solve conflicts. One component cannot exist without the other. This definition can be elaborated to ―how people handle themselves and their relationships‖, according to Goleman, Boyatzis, & McKee. So, ESI is a set of competencies, or abilities, organized along two distinct aspect (emotional and social) in how a person: (a) is aware of himself/herself; (b) manages him/herself; (c) is aware of others; and (d) manages his/her relationships with others. Building upon and integrating the competency research, Goleman, Boyatzis, and McKee presented a model of ESI with 18 competencies arrayed in four clusters and two aspects. Researcher Shaun identified socially intelligent people as: · They have confidence in social circumstances. · They have and demonstrate a genuine interest in their fellow beings. · They are capable of adapting, understanding and responding effectively. · They express their emotions and feelings clearly and appropriately with assertiveness. · They have an awareness of the internal and external locus of control. Karl Albrecht, around 2009, elaborated the five major dimensions of social intelligence as situational radar, presence/bearing, authenticity, clarity and empathy (can be seen as an acronym SPACE). 1. Situational Radar (Awareness): the ability to read situations, understand the social context and choose behavioral strategies that are most likely to be successful 2. Presence: the external sense of one‘s self that others perceive: confidence, bearing self- respect, and self-worth. 3. Authenticity: the opposite of being phony. Authenticity is a way of behaving which engenders a perception that one is honest with one‘s self as well as others. 4. Clarity: the ability to express one‘s self clearly, use language effectively, explain concepts clearly, and persuade with ideas. 5. Empathy: the ability to create a sense of connectedness with others; to get them on your wavelength and invite them to move with and toward you. In that decade, the consistent aspects of social intelligence among all researches were: the knowledge of the social situations, accurate interpretation of the social situation and the skills to behave appropriately in that social situation. Hopkins and Bilimoria opined that to be considered socially intelligent one has to be good at human relationships. Crowne defined it as the ability to interact effectively with others in any social situation. Emmerling and Boyatzis describe social intelligence competency as the ability to be aware of, understand and act on emotional information about others that leads to effective performance. Thus, what was proposed by Thorndike during the first half of the 1900s was initially perceived similarly as a single concept by fellow researchers. However, later others began to see social intelligence as a set of two personal intelligences, divided into interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligences that include knowledge about oneself and others. Many scholars proposed a number of different ways to be socially intelligent. It has been thought of as the ability to accomplish interpersonal tasks and to act wisely in relationships. It has been seen as a capability that allows one to produce adequate behaviour for the purpose of achieving a desired goal. It is thought that SI involves being intelligent in relationships. Some researchers even believed that the social facets of intelligence may be as important as the cognitive aspects. However, most of them agreed that the Social Intelligence includes knowledge of the social situations and the skill to perceive and interpret the situations accurately, for leading one to successfully behave in the situation. In other words, it has always been seen as an ability to interact effectively with others. In an important research, Süd, Weis, & Seidel focused on more of a potential-based concept of SI, rather than behavior-based approaches and the broader concept of social competence (i.e., including both cognitive and non-cognitive abilities and skills). In the potential-based approach, SI encompasses only the cognitive abilities as necessary prerequisites for social competent behavior. Consequently, social competent behavior is part of the external criterion, not the construct. Social competent behavior, on the other hand, depends on cognitive (i.e., SI) and non-cognitive prerequisites (e.g., intentions, motivation, personality traits, values, norms, etc.). Thus, SI has been specified as a multidimensional cognitive ability construct that relies on an integrative model derived from a literature review. This model integrates both theoretical and operational definitions of SI. In its current version, the model distinguishes between the following cognitive ability domains and has been in part supported by data in a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) study by Weis and Süd in 2007. So SI is about five qualities: Social understanding (SU) also social inference, social interpretation, or social judgment)represents the ability to understand social stimuli against the background of the given social situation. It also includes diversely labeled requirements such as the recognition of the mental states behind words, the comprehension of observed behaviors in the social context in which they occur, and the decoding of social cues. Social memory (SM) represents the ability to store and recall objectively given social information that can vary in complexity. The concept of SM was originally introduced by Moss and also appeared in works of Sternberg, Conway, Ketron, and Bernstein as memory for names and faces. Social perception (SP) represents the ability to perceive socially relevant information quickly in more or less complex situations. SP is distinguished from SU by only relying on objectively present information in order to exclude interpretative requirements. Social flexibility (SF) is the ability to produce as many and as diverse solutions or explanations as possible for a social situation or a social problem. The concept was originally introduced in Guilford‘s (1967) structure of human intellect model in the domain of divergent production of behavioural contents. Social knowledge (SK) includes knowledge of social matters, the individuals‘ fund of knowledge about the social world, or knowledge of the rules of etiquette. Unlike the remaining dimensions, SK highly depends on the social values of the environment and is not considered as a pure cognitive dimension. 1.2 Social Brain Goleman reveals that human beings have specific structures in their brains built to optimize relationships: · A spindle cell:- is the fastest acting neuron in our brain that guides our social decisions. Human brains contain more of these spindle cells than any other species. · Mirror neurons:- help us predict the behaviour of people around us by sub-consciously mimicking their movements. This helps us feel as they feel, move as they move, etc. · When a man gets a look from a woman he finds attractive, his brain secretes dopamine–a chemical that makes us feel pleasure. 1.3 Key elements of social intelligence: · Verbal fluency · Conversational skills · Knowledge of social roles and rules, as well as scripts · Effective listening skills · Understanding of how to cope well with others · Role playing · Social self-efficacy · Management skills · Intercultural and multicultural skills There‘s a lot going on behind one‘s words. While one speaks, the brain takes in micro- expressions, voice intonations, gestures and pheromones. 1.3.1 Micro-expressions: - are brief, involuntary facial expressions shown on the face of humans according to emotions experienced: · Usually occur in high-stakes situations, where people have something to lose or gain. · Occur when a person is consciously trying to conceal all signs of how they are feeling, or · When a person does not consciously know how they are feeling. · Unlike regular facial expressions, it is difficult/impossible to hide micro expression reactions. Micro-expressions cannot be controlled as they happen in a fraction of a second, but it is possible to capture someone's expressions with a high speed camera and replay them at much slower speeds. Micro-expressions express the seven universal emotions: disgust, anger, fear, sadness, happiness, contempt, and surprise. 1.3.2Voice intonations: · is the variation of pitch when one speaks (variation of levels we speak with is crucial in how we express ourselves) · one of the elements of linguistic prosody · the most important element of accent · helps to craft music of the language · it also helps the listener to follow the nature of communication Gestures and pheromones: - Pheromones give you the edge with attraction. People perceive all sorts of interesting things about one another through olfaction. It feels pretty normal – when we want something we take it, right? I‘m feeling thirsty; I‘ll grab a drink. I‘m hungry; I‘ll pick-up a snack. But you know what? This isn‘t what you should do when you desire a partner. The foundation of pick-up or game is ACQUISITION—the NEED to ACQUIRE a girl or man. This is the absolute, unquestioned and accepted law of game. The whole pick-up framework is built upon this. Simply, they are stimuli that elicit a reaction. Accordingly, people who have high SI have a greater awareness of their proto- conversations. 1.3.3 The Proto-conversation Goleman identifies two aspects of proto-conversations: Social Awareness: Your response to others (the manner in which you do so is crucial) Primal Empathy: Sensing other other‘s feelings and putting yourself in theirshoes Attunement: Listening with full receptivity Empathic Accuracy: Understanding others‘ thoughts and intentions Social Cognition: Understanding the social world and the working of a webof relationships Social Facility: Knowing how to have smooth, effective interactions Synchrony: Interacting smoothly Self-presentation: Knowing how you come across Influence: Shaping the outcome of social interactions Concern: Caring about others‘ needs 1.3.4 Your Social Triggers Social awareness is the capability to reckon that people and places trigger different emotions and this affects our ability to connect. Think about a time you felt excited and energized by an interaction. Now think of a time when you felt drained and defeated after an interaction. Along this, Goleman presents a theory on how our brain processes social interactions: The Low Road is our instinctual, emotion-based way we process interactions. It‘s how we read body-language, facial expressions and then formulate gut feelings about people. The High Road is our logical, critical thinking part of an interaction. We use the high road to communicate, tell stories and make connections. Why are these important? The Low Road guides our gut feelings and instincts. For example, if people didn‘t come to your birthday parties as a kid, you might feel a pang of anxiety when thinking about your own birthday as an adult–even if you have plenty of friends who would attend. Your High Road tells you that you are a grown up and things have changed, but your Low Road still gives you social anxiety. I call these social triggers. You should be aware of your unconscious social triggers to help you make relationship decisions. Knowing your Low Road social triggers helps your High Road function. Here‘s how you can identify yours: What kinds of social interactions do you dread? Who do you feel anxious hanging out with? When do you feel you can‘t be yourself? 1.3.5 Your Secure Base Whether you are a cheerful extrovert or a quiet introvert, everyone needs space and a place to recharge. Goleman suggests that‘s a ―secure base.‖ This is a ritual place or an activity that helps one process emotions and occurrences. A secure base is helpful for two main reasons. 1. It gives one a place to recharge before interactions so they don‘t get burnt out. 2. It helps one process and learn from each social encounter. 3. You can improve your Social Intelligence, you just need to prioritize it. Broken Bonds One of the biggest pitfalls in social intelligence is a lack of empathy. Goleman calls these Broken person treats Bonds. Philosopher Martin Buber coined the idea of the ―I-It‖ connection which happens when one another like an object as opposed to a human being. Imagine you have just lost a family member. You get a phone call from a friend offering condolences. Immediately you sense the obligation of the caller. They are distracted, you can hear the typing of keys in the background. Their wishes are cold, memorized and insincere. The call Case study: Cynthia receives an email from her friend, Joyce, every 60 days to grab lunch. Joyce‘s emails are always similar. When Cynthia realized the similarity in the emails, she started to think of herself as Joyce‘s ―calendar alert‖ that Joyce had set-up. Cynthia went low thinking as merely an item on Joyce‘s to do list. Cynthia analyzed that Joyce felt she ‗should‘ do lunch to keep in touch. But this led to their lunches to be perfunctory, predictable and boring to Cynthia. So, Cynthia stopped saying yes to grabbing lunch with her friend. · Don‘t interact because you feel that you ‗should.‘ · Say no to obligations if you can. · Interact with empathy or don‘t interact at all. 2. Positively Infectious When someone smiles at you, it‘s hard not to smile back. The same goes for other facial expressions. When your friend is sad and begins to tear up, your own eyes will often get moist. Why? These are your mirror neurons in action–part of your Low Road response to people. ―Hang out with people whose moods you want to catch. ―If moods are catching, gravitate towards people who will infect you with the good ones‖ 3. Adopt to Adapt Empathy works in such a way that one‘s Low Road automatically mirrors the people around them. Our brain copies the people around us, so we feel as they feel. This in turn helps us understand them, where they are coming from and even be better at predicting their reactions. ―Many paths of the low road run through mirror neurons. The neurons activate in a person based on something that is experienced by another person in the same way is experienced by the person himself. Whether pain (or pleasure) is anticipated or seen in another, the same neuron is activated.‖ makes you feel worse, not better.-Goleman, 41 4. Beware the Dark Triad Goleman shares the dark triad of people: · The narcissistic personality is when someone has an inflated view of themselves, a huge ego and a sense of entitlement. · The Machiavellian personality is when someone is manipulative and consistently exploits the people around them. · The psychopath personality is someone who is impulsive, remorselessness and extremely selfish. Goleman summarizes the dark triad motto as: Others exist to adore me. 5. Mindblind Mindblind is the inability to sense what is happening in the mind of someone else. The key to mindsight is compassion. ―In short, self-absorption in all its forms kills empathy, let alone compassion. When we focus on ourselves, our world contracts as our problems and preoccupations loom large. But when we focus on others, our world expands. Our own problems drift to the periphery of the mind and so seem smaller, and we increase our capacity for connection – or compassionate action.‖ – Goleman, 54 Goleman claims that people are wired for altruism. People are inherently good. However, sometimes they forget how good it makes them feel to be good. Dr. Baron-Cohen devised something called the Empathy Quotient. This is a quiz to test your empathy levels. While he devised the test for adults on the Aspergers or Autism Spectrum, but this quiz has been found to be very helpful. 6. A People Prescription ―The most striking finding on relationships and physical health is that socially integrated people, those who are married, have close family and friends, belong to social and religious groups, and participate widely in these networks, recover more quickly from disease and live longer. Roughly eighteen studies show a strong connection between social connectivity and mortality.‖ – Goleman, 247. 1.3.6 Synthesis of ways to develop your social intelligence: How to develop social intelligence? According to Goleman ―friends make you healthy;‖ healthy happy life is positive relationships. Your partner, friends, colleagues and children, support your soul as well as our immune system. This has been realized through studies that have found that kinds words, physical touch, a song from childhood improve the vital signs of the sick and even fatally ill. Therefore, investing in your relationships is worth the effort. Simply put, following are ways in which you can develop your social intelligence: · Willingness and dedication to learn · Paying more attention to social happenings around you · Develop yourself to be a better speaker · Networking · Try to listen more to others (active listening) · Inquisitiveness to know more about social situations · Learn more about your own behaviour · Acquire knowledge on social successes and failures 1.3.7 Let’s look at the kinds of smart for you to be to figure that out and answer: Gardner, a developmental psychologist and Harvard professor name, developed in the 80s and 90s. In his book Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, Gardner developed the approach that intelligence is spectrum composed of different kinds of minds and therefore people learn, remember, and understand in different ways. He initially listed 7 types of intelligences, and later added the 8th (naturalist). This is what it looks like: 1. Visual-Spatial Intelligence People who are strong in visual-spatial intelligence are good at visualizing things. These individuals are often good with directions as well as maps, charts, videos, and pictures. Strengths Visual and spatial judgment Characteristics People with visual-spatial intelligence: · Read and write for enjoyment · Are good at putting puzzles together · Interpret pictures, graphs, and charts well · Enjoy drawing, painting, and the visual arts · Recognize patterns easily Potential Career Choices If you're strong in visual-spatial intelligence, good career choices for you are: · Architect · Artist · Engineer 2. Linguistic-Verbal Intelligence People who are strong in linguistic-verbal intelligence are able to use words well, both when writing and speaking. These individuals are typically very good at writing stories, memorizing information, and reading.1 Strengths Words, language, and writing Characteristics People with linguistic-verbal intelligence: · Remember written and spoken information · Enjoy reading and writing · Debate or give persuasive speeches · Are able to explain things well · Use humour when telling stories Potential Career Choices If you're strong in linguistic-verbal intelligence, good career choices for you are: · Writer/journalist · Lawyer · Teacher 3. Logical-Mathematical Intelligence People who are strong in logical-mathematical intelligence are good at reasoning, recognizing patterns, and logically analyzing problems. These individuals tend to think conceptually about numbers, relationships, and patterns.4 Strengths Analyzing problems and mathematical operations Characteristics People with logical-mathematical intelligence: · Have excellent problem-solving skills · Enjoy thinking about abstract ideas · Like conducting scientific experiments · Can solve complex computations Potential Career Choices If you're strong in logical-mathematical intelligence, good career choices for you are: · Scientist · Mathematician · Computer programmer · Engineer · Accountant 4. Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence Those who have high bodily-kinesthetic intelligence are said to be good at body movement, performing actions, and physical control. People who are strong in this area tend to have excellent hand-eye coordination and dexterity. Strengths Physical movement, motor control Characteristics People with bodily-kinesthetic intelligence: · Are skilled at dancing and sports · Enjoy creating things with his or her hands · Have excellent physical coordination · Remember by doing, rather than hearing or seeing Potential Career Choices If you're strong in bodily-kinesthetic intelligence, good career choices for you are: · Dancer · Builder · Sculptor · Actor 5. Musical Intelligence People who have strong musical intelligence are good at thinking in patterns, rhythms, and sounds. They have a strong appreciation for music and are often good at musical composition and performance. Strengths Rhythm and music Characteristics People with musical intelligence: · Enjoy singing and playing musical instruments · Recognize musical patterns and tones easily · Remember songs and melodies · Have a rich understanding of musical structure, rhythm, and notes Potential Career Choices If you're strong in musical intelligence, good career choices for you are: · Musician · Composer · Singer · Music teacher · Conductor 6. Interpersonal Intelligence Those who have strong interpersonal intelligence are good at understanding and interacting with other people. These individuals are skilled at assessing the emotions, motivations, desires, and intentions of those around them. Strengths Understanding and relating to other people Characteristics People with interpersonal intelligence: · Communicate well verbally · Are skilled at nonverbal communication · See situations from different perspectives · Create positive relationships with others · Resolve conflicts in group settings Potential Career Choices If you're strong in interpersonal intelligence, good career choices for you are: · Psychologist · Philosopher · Counselor · Salesperson · Politician 7. Intrapersonal Intelligence Individuals who are strong in intrapersonal intelligence are good at being aware of their own emotional states, feelings, and motivations. They tend to enjoy self-reflection and analysis, including daydreaming, exploring relationships with others, and assessing their personal strengths. Strengths Introspection and self-reflection Characteristics People with intrapersonal intelligence: · Analyze their strengths and weaknesses well · Enjoy analyzing theories and ideas · Have excellent self-awareness · Understand the basis for his or her own motivations and feelings Potential Career Choices If you're strong in intrapersonal intelligence, good career choices for you are: · Philosopher · Writer · Theorist · Scientist 8. Naturalistic Intelligence Naturalistic is the most recent addition to Gardner‘s theory and has been met with more resistance than his original seven intelligences. According to Gardner, individuals who are high in this type of intelligence are more in tune with nature and are often interested in nurturing, exploring the environment, and learning about other species. These individuals are said to be highly aware of even subtle changes to their environments. Strengths Finding patterns and relationships to nature Characteristics People with naturalistic intelligence: · Are interested in subjects such as botany, biology, and zoology · Categorize and catalog information easily · Enjoy camping, gardening, hiking, and exploring the outdoors · Dislikes learning unfamiliar topics that have no connection to nature Potential Career Choices If you're strong in naturalistic intelligence, good career choices for you are: · Biologist · Conservationist · Gardener · Farmer Some questions to address on your own are: What are you smart on? What evidence do you have that made you reach that decision? What do others say aboutyour smart/s? Topic 2: Social Intelligence in relation to Engineering Introduction Internationally it has been witnessed that engineering students need more skills than engineering education. Competitive graduates require relevant skills that has honed them to be dynamic and function effectively in the workplace and society. Lack of Social Intelligence skills, also known as Social Intelligence quotient (SI) skills in students affect their performance and has been regarded to be leading to higher drop-out rates and poor quality of the engineering. Recent literature emphasizes a need for engineering to integrate necessary non-engineering skills such as SI and emotional intelligence (EI) skills. These two are closely related and tend to be confused. However, there’s a thin line between them. Research, professional bodies and experts have identified that the graduate engineer requires many skills and a great deal of knowledge when entering the workforce. Crucial elements such as interpersonal skills, as well as teamwork and a strong sense of motivation are regarded to be particularly relevant in this era of globalization, occurring in a dynamic speed and dictates environment in which the modern engineer must interact. Real Engineering and RealLife The heavy traditionalism of many courses have the perspective of teaching only real engineering especially, defining and isolating problems and achieving technical solutions. Exposure to this culture of traditionalist engineering education not only discourages reflection, but also generates future engineers who both lack and do not appreciate the value of the skills of reflection. Along with that, do engineering studies actively discourage the ESI factor by the very nature of the traditionalist style of teaching in this field? Such traditionalist teaching imparts engineering as a discipline rather than as a career. The Evolution of EngineeringEducation Overtime, engineering has progressively become less and less of a stand-alone subject. Other disciplines have influenced and became increasingly integrated in engineering curricula in order to increase the sharpness of a university‘s graduates, thereby responding to industry demands, e.g. management, business strategy, marketing, philosophy, communication, ethics, environmentalism, sustainability, etc. Engineers‘ attitudes to the soft skills area, incorporating people, ideas and self- reflection, have to be tackled at a fundamental level. Universities along employers have identified necessary skills that need to be integrated into the curricula. These are complemented with abilities that are valued by both universities and particularly employers, and they include some of the following: · Self- and context-awareness. · Decision-making and action planning. · Research and analysis. · Communication skills. · Critical reflection. · Problem solving · Creativity Cognisant of the fact that, the above-mentioned soft skills are part of engineering profession (engineering skills necessary in the fields of engineering) these characteristics can be effectively incorporated as parts of the elements of SI/ESI. These are subjects in humanities that have been regarded to play an active role in the education of future engineers who can reflect and display sensitivity to both individuals and society. Create the Future Socially intelligent engineers have the opportunity to manifest future changes and actively create the future. Indeed, Cooper and Sawaf state that: ... successfully intelligent leaders and managers continually question many of the assumptions that others accept ... [and] they challenge it perceiving the deeper risks and limitations, and in many cases find ways to transcend it ... They know the future is not something we wait for; it is something we must actively help create. And emotional intelligence plays a vital role. Social intelligence Unit 1
flashcards Flashcard (4)
studied byStudied by 1 person
4 days ago
0.0(0)
SOCY 200 Human Societies Study Guide Dr. Swann - 2024 Spring Final The test will be very similar in format to the midterm but with 5 or 10 more questions likely. I will discuss the format further during class. This is a guide, not an exhaustive list. Concepts •Inequality- Understand the prevalence and impact of inequality along gender, racial, and sexual lines Gender Inequality: Economic Disparities: Women often earn less than men for the same work and are disproportionately represented in lower-paying jobs and industries. Political Underrepresentation: Women are often underrepresented in politics and leadership positions, affecting policy decisions and societal norms. Social Expectations and Stereotypes: Gender norms and stereotypes can limit opportunities and reinforce unequal power dynamics. Racial Inequality: Wealth Gap: Historical discrimination and systemic barriers have resulted in significant wealth disparities between racial groups. Criminal Justice System: Racial minorities, especially Black and Latino individuals, are disproportionately affected by police violence, mass incarceration, and harsher sentencing. Education: Schools in predominantly minority communities often lack resources and face systemic biases, leading to unequal educational outcomes. Sexual Orientation and Identity: Legal Discrimination: In many places, LGBTQ+ individuals face legal discrimination in areas such as employment, housing, and access to healthcare. Violence and Harassment: LGBTQ+ individuals are at a higher risk of experiencing violence, harassment, and discrimination, which can lead to mental health issues and social exclusion. Family Rights: Legal recognition and rights for same-sex couples and LGBTQ+ parents vary widely across regions, impacting their ability to access services and protections. •Media Influence- Understand the role and sphere of influence of the media o. How much do we consume and what do we consume o. What you watch affects your beliefs o. Trust in the media o. What the media shows/ discusses and what the media does not show/discuss How much do we consume and what do we consume: Media consumption has dramatically increased with the advent of digital technology and the internet. People spend significant amounts of time engaging with various forms of media, including television, radio, newspapers, websites, social media platforms, podcasts, and streaming services. The content consumed varies widely, ranging from news, entertainment, sports, educational material, to user-generated content. Preferences for specific types of content are influenced by individual interests, demographics, and cultural factors. What you watch affects your beliefs: Numerous studies have demonstrated the correlation between media exposure and beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. The content we consume can shape our perceptions of the world, our understanding of social issues, and our attitudes towards different groups and cultures. Media representations of gender, race, ethnicity, and other social identities can influence stereotypes and perpetuate biases. Exposure to diverse and inclusive media can challenge these stereotypes and promote empathy and understanding. Trust in the media: Trust in traditional media sources has been declining in recent years, influenced by factors such as perceived bias, misinformation, sensationalism, and corporate ownership. Trust is crucial for the credibility and effectiveness of media organizations. Transparency, accuracy, accountability, and editorial independence are essential for building and maintaining trust with audiences. What the media shows/discusses and what the media does not show/discuss: Media outlets play a critical role in shaping public discourse by determining which issues receive attention and how they are framed. This process, known as agenda-setting, influences the public's perception of what is important and newsworthy. Media coverage can be influenced by various factors, including editorial priorities, commercial interests, political agendas, and audience preferences. Certain topics may receive extensive coverage, while others are overlooked or underreported. Media gatekeeping, where editors and producers decide which stories to prioritize, can contribute to the amplification or suppression of certain voices and perspectives. Lack of diversity in newsrooms can also lead to gaps in coverage and representation. •Social Media o. Impacts on society ▪Gen Z ▪Impacts on mental health •Specifically Gen Z Gen Z and Social Media: Gen Z is the first generation to grow up entirely in the digital age, making social media an integral part of their lives from a young age. Social media platforms serve as primary channels for communication, self-expression, entertainment, and socialization among Gen Z. They use platforms like Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, and Twitter to connect with peers, share experiences, and explore their identities. Impact on Mental Health: Social media usage among Gen Z has been linked to various mental health challenges, including anxiety, depression, loneliness, and body image issues. Comparison: Social media often promotes unrealistic standards of beauty, success, and happiness, leading to feelings of inadequacy and low self-esteem among Gen Z users who compare themselves to curated and filtered images and lifestyles. Cyberbullying: Gen Z faces increased risks of cyberbullying and online harassment through social media platforms, which can have devastating effects on their mental health and well-being. Fear of Missing Out (FOMO): Gen Z's constant exposure to their peers' activities and experiences on social media can exacerbate feelings of FOMO, anxiety, and social isolation. Digital Addiction: Excessive use of social media can contribute to digital addiction, where Gen Z individuals find it challenging to disconnect from their devices and prioritize offline activities, leading to sleep disturbances, concentration difficulties, and overall diminished well-being. Addressing Mental Health Challenges: Some efforts are underway to address mental health challenges associated with social media use among Gen Z: Digital literacy programs and mental health education initiatives aim to empower Gen Z with the skills to critically evaluate online content, recognize harmful behaviors, and seek support when needed. Mental health advocates and organizations collaborate with social media platforms to implement safety features, anti-bullying measures, and resources for mental health support. Increased awareness and destigmatization of mental health issues help Gen Z feel more comfortable seeking help and support from trusted adults, peers, and mental health professionals. o. Prevalence and ubiquity ▪How quickly adopted/became normative Prevalence and Ubiquity: Social media platforms have become ubiquitous in contemporary society, with billions of users worldwide across various demographics. These platforms facilitate instant communication, content sharing, and community building, fundamentally altering how people connect, share information, and engage with each other. The prevalence of social media is evident in its integration into daily life activities, including personal relationships, work, education, entertainment, and even activism. Speed of Adoption: The adoption of social media occurred rapidly, driven by advances in technology, the proliferation of internet access, and changing cultural norms. Platforms like Facebook, launched in 2004, experienced exponential growth, reaching millions of users within a few years. Similarly, Twitter (2006), Instagram (2010), and Snapchat (2011) gained widespread popularity relatively quickly. The advent of smartphones and mobile apps further accelerated social media adoption, enabling users to access platforms anytime, anywhere, and fostering continuous engagement. Normative Status: Social media has transitioned from a novelty to a normative aspect of contemporary life, influencing social norms, behaviors, and expectations. It's now considered customary for individuals, businesses, organizations, and even governments to maintain a presence on social media platforms to communicate, engage with stakeholders, and stay relevant. Social media usage is normalized across generations, with younger demographics, such as Gen Z, incorporating it seamlessly into their daily routines and identity formation processes. •Immigrants -Understand the labeling of different waves and generations of immigrants and what these labels entail o. Where do most immigrants come from o. Periods of internal migration in the US o. Deportation Labeling of Immigrant Waves and Generations: First Wave: Refers to the initial period of significant immigration to the United States, primarily from European countries during the 19th and early 20th centuries. This wave included immigrants from Ireland, Germany, Italy, and Eastern European countries. Second Wave: This term is often used to describe the period of immigration that occurred after restrictive immigration laws were lifted in the mid-20th century. It includes immigrants from Latin America, Asia, and other regions, driven by factors such as labor demand, family reunification, and political instability. Third Wave: Sometimes referred to as contemporary immigration, this wave encompasses recent immigration trends, characterized by globalization, advancements in transportation, and changes in immigration policies. It includes immigrants from diverse backgrounds, including Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America. Where do most immigrants come from: Historically, immigrants to the United States have come from various regions around the world, depending on geopolitical events, economic conditions, and immigration policies. In recent years, the majority of immigrants to the United States have come from countries in Latin America, particularly Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean, as well as from Asian countries such as China, India, the Philippines, and Vietnam. Periods of Internal Migration in the US: Internal migration within the United States has also played a significant role in shaping demographic patterns and regional development. Historical periods of internal migration include the westward expansion during the 19th century, the Great Migration of African Americans from the South to northern cities during the early to mid-20th century, and more recent trends of migration from rural to urban areas. Deportation: Deportation refers to the formal removal of immigrants from a country due to violations of immigration laws or other legal grounds. The United States has a long history of deportation, including periods of mass deportation, such as the Mexican Repatriation during the 1930s and the deportation of undocumented immigrants in recent years. Deportation policies and practices have been subject to debate and controversy, with concerns raised about due process, human rights, and the impact on families and communities. •Gender- Understand Socialized Gender Differences o. ‘Real’ differences between males and females ▪How those things play into the social construction of gender, gender stereotypes, and gender roles Biological Differences: Males and females do exhibit biological differences, including differences in reproductive anatomy, hormones, and certain physical characteristics. These differences are often related to reproductive functions and secondary sexual characteristics but do not fully account for the wide range of behaviors, traits, and capabilities exhibited by individuals of different genders. Social Construction of Gender: Gender is a socially constructed concept, meaning that the roles, behaviors, expectations, and identities associated with masculinity and femininity are shaped by cultural norms, beliefs, and institutions. Socialization begins at an early age and continues throughout life, with individuals learning and internalizing gender norms and expectations through interactions with family, peers, media, and other social institutions. Gender Stereotypes: Gender stereotypes are oversimplified, generalized beliefs about the characteristics, abilities, and behaviors of males and females. These stereotypes often perpetuate traditional notions of gender roles and reinforce inequality and discrimination. For example, stereotypes may dictate that males are assertive, strong, and rational, while females are nurturing, emotional, and submissive. These stereotypes can limit individuals' opportunities and perpetuate harmful gender norms. Gender Roles: Gender roles refer to the societal expectations and norms regarding the behaviors, responsibilities, and activities deemed appropriate for males and females. These roles can vary across cultures and historical contexts but often involve expectations related to caregiving, household duties, employment, and leadership. Gender roles are reinforced through socialization processes and institutions such as family, education, religion, and media, influencing individuals' self-concepts and behaviors. Interplay Between Biological and Social Factors: While biological differences may contribute to certain tendencies or predispositions, the social construction of gender significantly shapes how these differences are perceived, interpreted, and valued within society. For example, biological differences in strength or reproductive functions may influence the division of labor and social roles assigned to men and women, but societal expectations and cultural norms also play a crucial role in defining what is considered "appropriate" behavior for each gender. o. Understanding that most gendered differences are social ▪Leisure activities, desired jobs, self-care, willingness to ask for help, etc. Leisure Activities: Gender norms and expectations often influence the types of leisure activities individuals engage in. For example, sports may be more encouraged and accessible for boys, while girls may be steered towards activities perceived as more feminine, such as dance or art. These gendered leisure preferences can be shaped by socialization, media representations, peer influences, and parental expectations. Desired Jobs: Gender stereotypes and societal norms can influence individuals' career aspirations and choices. Certain professions may be seen as more suitable or desirable for men or women based on perceptions of gender roles and abilities. Women may face barriers or discouragement from pursuing careers in male-dominated fields such as STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics), while men may encounter stigma or pressure for choosing traditionally female-dominated professions like nursing or teaching. Self-Care: Gendered expectations around self-care can impact how individuals prioritize their physical and emotional well-being. Women may be socialized to prioritize caregiving and nurturing roles, often at the expense of their own self-care needs. Men, on the other hand, may face societal pressures to prioritize stoicism and self-reliance, which can discourage seeking help for mental health issues or engaging in activities perceived as self-indulgent, such as therapy or self-care practices. Willingness to Ask for Help: Gender norms can influence individuals' attitudes towards seeking help and expressing vulnerability. Women may be socialized to be more comfortable seeking support and expressing emotions, while men may feel pressure to suppress vulnerability and handle challenges independently. These gendered expectations can impact help-seeking behaviors, mental health outcomes, and interpersonal relationships, contributing to disparities in access to support services and resources. o. Gender roles ▪Changing mom and dad roles •Women now expected to work •Increasing Age of 1st birth in America and across the world o. Explanations Changing Mom and Dad Roles: Traditionally, gender roles within families often assigned women the primary responsibility for caregiving and homemaking, while men were expected to be the primary breadwinners. However, societal shifts, including women's increasing education levels, workforce participation, and changing attitudes towards gender roles, have led to a reevaluation of these traditional roles. Women Expected to Work: Women's participation in the workforce has been steadily increasing over the past century, driven by factors such as economic necessity, greater educational opportunities, and changing social norms. As a result, women are no longer solely defined by their roles as caregivers and homemakers but are increasingly expected to pursue careers and contribute to household income. Increasing Age of First Birth: Across the United States and many other parts of the world, there has been a trend towards delaying the age of first birth. Several factors contribute to this trend, including: Education and Career Pursuits: As women pursue higher education and establish careers, they may delay starting a family to focus on personal and professional goals. Economic Factors: Financial stability and economic concerns play a significant role in family planning decisions. Many couples choose to delay having children until they feel financially secure. Access to Contraception and Family Planning Services: Increased access to contraception and family planning resources allows individuals more control over their reproductive choices, including when to have children. Cultural and Social Changes: Changing societal attitudes towards marriage, childbearing, and family dynamics also contribute to the trend of delaying parenthood. Explanations: The changing roles of moms and dads and the trend of delaying the age of first birth reflect broader shifts in societal norms, economic structures, and cultural expectations. These changes are driven by factors such as increased gender equality, greater access to education and career opportunities for women, and evolving attitudes towards family and parenthood. While these shifts represent progress towards more egalitarian and flexible gender roles, they also present challenges, including balancing work and family responsibilities, addressing childcare needs, and navigating societal expectations. •Decreasing family sizes across much of the world o. Hans Rosling Hans Rosling, a Swedish physician, academic, and statistician, was a prominent advocate for data-driven analysis and global health equity. He founded the Gapminder Foundation, which aims to promote a fact-based worldview through the innovative use of data visualization tools. Rosling's work often focused on challenging misconceptions and stereotypes about global development, population trends, and socio-economic disparities. One of the key topics he addressed was the phenomenon of decreasing family sizes across much of the world. Decreasing Family Sizes: Rosling emphasized that as societies undergo economic development and improvements in healthcare and education, fertility rates tend to decline. This decline in fertility rates is often attributed to factors such as increased access to contraception, higher levels of education for women, greater economic opportunities, and changes in cultural norms surrounding family planning. As families become more educated and economically stable, they often choose to have fewer children, prioritizing quality of life and investing more resources in each child's education and well-being. Rosling's work helped debunk myths and misconceptions about population growth, illustrating that global fertility rates were decreasing rather than increasing. He highlighted the importance of accurate data and evidence-based analysis in understanding complex global trends and informing policy decisions. o. Performing Gender o. F*g Discourse/ Self-policing ▪CJ Pascoe o. Changes in notions of gender ▪Specifically among Gen Z Performing gender refers to how individuals enact and express their gender identity through behaviors, appearances, and interactions, often influenced by societal norms and expectations. Here's an exploration of f*g discourse and self-policing, as well as changes in notions of gender, particularly among Gen Z: F*g Discourse/Self-policing: F*g discourse refers to derogatory language and derogatory labeling used to police and stigmatize individuals who deviate from traditional gender norms, particularly masculinity norms. CJ Pascoe, a sociologist, conducted research on masculinity and gender among adolescent boys, particularly focusing on how boys engage in f*g discourse and self-policing behaviors to assert and maintain their masculine identities. Pascoe's work highlighted how boys use homophobic language and behaviors to reinforce masculinity norms, establish social hierarchies, and police each other's gender performances. This self-policing can create pressure for conformity and marginalize individuals who do not conform to dominant gender expectations. Changes in Notions of Gender, Specifically Among Gen Z: Gen Z is often characterized by its greater openness and acceptance of diverse gender identities and expressions compared to previous generations. Gen Z individuals are more likely to challenge traditional binary notions of gender and embrace a spectrum of gender identities beyond the male-female binary. Social media and online communities have played a significant role in facilitating conversations around gender diversity and providing platforms for individuals to express their authentic selves. Gen Z's attitudes towards gender reflect broader cultural shifts towards greater acceptance and inclusivity, challenging stereotypes and norms that limit expression and self-discovery. •Race- Understand the social construction of race and historical narratives and changes o. Racial formation ▪Omi and Winant Racial Formation: Omi and Winant argue that race is not a fixed, biological category but rather a social construct that is continually produced and contested within specific historical and social contexts. They emphasize that race is a dynamic and relational concept, shaped by power dynamics, ideologies, institutions, and cultural representations. Racial formation involves the articulation of racial meanings, the institutionalization of racial practices, and the mobilization of racial groups in pursuit of their interests. Key Concepts: Racial Projects: Omi and Winant introduce the concept of racial projects, which are coordinated efforts by individuals, groups, and institutions to define and organize racial categories and relations. Racial projects can take various forms, including policies, laws, discourses, and cultural representations. Racialization: Racialization refers to the process through which social groups are categorized and marked by race, attributing certain characteristics, statuses, and meanings to them. Racialization can occur through explicit policies, implicit biases, and cultural stereotypes. Racial Formation Regimes: Omi and Winant analyze racial formation as a complex system of racial categories, hierarchies, and ideologies that shape social relations and institutions. Racial formation regimes encompass the historical and structural dimensions of racial dynamics within society. Historical Narratives and Changes: Omi and Winant's framework helps to understand the historical narratives and changes in racial dynamics in the United States and beyond. It highlights how racial categories and meanings have been constructed, contested, and transformed over time through processes of colonization, slavery, immigration, segregation, and globalization. For example, the shift from explicit forms of racial segregation to more subtle forms of racial inequality and discrimination reflects changes in racial formations and ideologies. Historical events such as the Civil Rights Movement, immigration waves, and globalization have also influenced racial formations, challenging existing racial hierarchies and identities while also generating new forms of racialization and social conflict. o. Racism ▪Implicit v explicit ▪Structural v personal Implicit vs. Explicit Racism: Explicit Racism: Explicit racism refers to overt, conscious expressions of racial prejudice and discrimination. This can include acts such as racial slurs, hate speech, hate crimes, and discriminatory practices based on race. Examples of explicit racism include racially motivated violence, discriminatory hiring practices, segregationist policies, and hate groups advocating for racial superiority. Implicit Racism: Implicit racism refers to unconscious biases, attitudes, and stereotypes that influence behavior and decision-making, often without individuals being aware of it. These biases can manifest in subtle ways, such as microaggressions, implicit biases in hiring and promotion decisions, and differential treatment based on race in various social contexts. Implicit racism can be perpetuated through cultural stereotypes, media representations, and socialization processes, leading to systemic inequalities and disparities. Structural vs. Personal Racism: Structural Racism: Structural racism refers to how societal institutions, policies, and practices perpetuate racial inequalities and disparities, often regardless of individual intent or prejudice. Structural racism operates at the systemic level, shaping access to resources, opportunities, and power based on race. It is embedded within social, political, economic, and cultural systems. Examples of structural racism include disparities in education, housing, healthcare, employment, criminal justice, and representation in positions of power. Personal Racism: Personal racism involves individual attitudes, beliefs, and actions that perpetuate racial prejudice, discrimination, and bias. This can include acts of overt discrimination, implicit biases, racial stereotypes, and microaggressions perpetrated by individuals in interpersonal interactions. While personal racism is often influenced by broader social structures and cultural norms, it operates at the level of individual behavior and attitudes. o. Inequality by race o. Criminal justice differences Inequality by race in the criminal justice system is a complex and longstanding issue that encompasses disparities at various stages of the criminal justice process. Here's an overview of some key aspects: 1. Policing: Racial profiling: Minority individuals, particularly Black and Hispanic individuals, are disproportionately targeted for stops, searches, and arrests by law enforcement agencies based on their race or ethnicity, rather than evidence of criminal activity. Use of force: Black individuals are more likely to experience police use of force, including deadly force, compared to their White counterparts, leading to higher rates of injury and death among Black communities. 2. Arrests and Charging: Disproportionate arrests: Black and Hispanic individuals are overrepresented in arrest statistics for various offenses, including drug-related offenses, despite similar rates of drug use across racial groups. Charging decisions: Studies have shown racial disparities in charging decisions, with Black and Hispanic individuals more likely to be charged with more serious offenses and face harsher penalties compared to White individuals for similar offenses. 3. Pretrial Detention and Bail: Pretrial detention: Black and Hispanic individuals are more likely to be detained pretrial and less likely to be released on bail compared to White individuals, leading to longer periods of incarceration before trial and increased pressure to plead guilty to avoid prolonged detention. Bail disparities: Racial and socioeconomic disparities in access to bail contribute to inequalities in pretrial detention, with minority and low-income individuals disproportionately affected. 4. Sentencing and Incarceration: Sentencing disparities: Black and Hispanic individuals are more likely to receive longer sentences compared to White individuals for similar offenses, contributing to racial disparities in incarceration rates. Mass incarceration: The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world, and racial minorities, particularly Black individuals, are disproportionately represented in the prison population. 5. Reentry and Recidivism: Reentry challenges: Upon release from incarceration, racial minorities face numerous barriers to successful reintegration into society, including limited access to employment, housing, education, and social support networks. Recidivism rates: Due to systemic inequalities and limited opportunities post-release, racial minorities are more likely to cycle in and out of the criminal justice system, perpetuating the cycle of incarceration and disadvantage. o. Between the world and me ▪Discussion questions ▪Thesis ▪TaNahesi Coates "Between the World and Me" by Ta-Nehisi Coates is a powerful exploration of race, identity, and the Black experience in America. Here are some discussion questions, the thesis of the book, and an overview of Ta-Nehisi Coates: Discussion Questions: How does Coates use personal narrative and historical analysis to convey his message about the experience of being Black in America? What role does fear play in shaping Coates' understanding of race and identity? How does he navigate and confront fear throughout the book? How does Coates critique the concept of the American Dream and the idea of progress in the context of racial inequality and injustice? What does Coates mean by "the Dream" and "the Dreamers," and how do these concepts shape his understanding of American society and its treatment of Black bodies? How does Coates grapple with the notion of hope in the face of systemic racism and violence against Black individuals and communities? How does Coates explore the relationship between the body, identity, and vulnerability in the context of racialized violence and oppression? Thesis: The central thesis of "Between the World and Me" revolves around Coates' exploration of the Black experience in America, particularly how systemic racism, violence, and structural inequality shape and define the lives of Black individuals. Coates argues that America's history of slavery, segregation, and ongoing racial injustice fundamentally contradicts the ideals of liberty and equality upon which the nation was founded. He presents a searing critique of the myth of the American Dream and calls attention to the pervasive fear and violence faced by Black bodies in American society. Ultimately, Coates urges readers to confront the harsh realities of race in America and to reckon with the legacy of white supremacy to work towards a more just and equitable society. Ta-Nehisi Coates: Ta-Nehisi Coates is an acclaimed writer, journalist, and educator known for his insightful commentary on race, politics, and culture in America. He has written for publications such as The Atlantic, where he gained widespread recognition for his essays on race, history, and social justice. Coates is also the author of several books, including "Between the World and Me," which won the National Book Award for Nonfiction in 2015, and "The Water Dancer," a novel exploring the legacy of slavery and the Underground Railroad. Coates' writing is characterized by its lyrical prose, meticulous research, and unflinching examination of the complexities of race and identity in America. He continues to be a prominent voice in conversations about race, history, and social justice, challenging readers to confront uncomfortable truths and envision a more equitable future. •Sexual Inequality- US beliefs about gay marriage In the United States, beliefs about gay marriage have evolved significantly over time, reflecting broader changes in societal attitudes towards LGBTQ+ rights and equality. However, sexual inequality persists in various forms, including discrimination, stigma, and legal barriers faced by LGBTQ+ individuals, particularly in relation to marriage and family rights. Historical Context: Until relatively recently, same-sex marriage was widely stigmatized and prohibited by law in the United States. For much of the country's history, marriage was legally defined as a union between a man and a woman, excluding LGBTQ+ couples from the institution of marriage and its associated legal rights and benefits. Shift in Public Opinion: Over the past few decades, there has been a notable shift in public opinion regarding gay marriage. Increased visibility and advocacy efforts by LGBTQ+ individuals and allies have contributed to greater acceptance and support for marriage equality. Polls have consistently shown a growing majority of Americans in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage. Legalization and Recognition: In a landmark decision in 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that same-sex couples have the fundamental right to marry under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This ruling legalized gay marriage nationwide, granting LGBTQ+ couples access to the same legal rights and benefits afforded to heterosexual couples. Persistent Challenges: Despite the legalization of same-sex marriage, sexual inequality persists in various forms. LGBTQ+ individuals continue to face discrimination, prejudice, and social stigma, which can impact their ability to freely express their identities and form relationships. Furthermore, legal protections for LGBTQ+ rights vary from state to state, and some states have enacted laws or policies that undermine marriage equality or allow for discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Intersectional Issues: Sexual inequality intersects with other forms of inequality, including race, gender identity, and socioeconomic status. LGBTQ+ individuals who belong to marginalized communities may face compounded discrimination and barriers to accessing marriage rights and other resources. Advocacy and Resistance: Advocacy efforts by LGBTQ+ activists and allies continue to challenge sexual inequality and push for greater recognition of LGBTQ+ rights, including marriage equality. However, resistance to LGBTQ+ rights persists in some quarters, leading to ongoing debates and legal battles over issues such as religious exemptions, adoption rights, and transgender rights. o. Income of LGBT people The income of LGBTQ+ people can vary widely depending on factors such as education, occupation, location, and other demographic characteristics. However, research indicates that LGBTQ+ individuals as a group may face economic disparities compared to their non-LGBTQ+ counterparts. Here are some key points regarding the income of LGBTQ+ people: Wage Gap: Studies have found evidence of a wage gap between LGBTQ+ individuals and their heterosexual counterparts. This wage gap can be attributed to various factors, including workplace discrimination, bias, and unequal opportunities for career advancement. Employment Discrimination: LGBTQ+ individuals may experience discrimination in the workplace, which can impact their ability to secure employment, earn promotions, or receive equal pay for equal work. Discriminatory practices based on sexual orientation or gender identity contribute to economic inequalities within the LGBTQ+ community. Intersectionality: The economic experiences of LGBTQ+ individuals are shaped by intersecting factors such as race, gender identity, and socioeconomic status. LGBTQ+ people who belong to marginalized groups may face compounded discrimination and economic hardship, further exacerbating income disparities. Access to Benefits: Prior to the legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States, many LGBTQ+ couples were denied access to spousal benefits such as health insurance, retirement benefits, and tax advantages. Even after marriage equality, disparities in access to benefits may persist for LGBTQ+ individuals who live in states without explicit protections for LGBTQ+ rights. Housing and Homelessness: LGBTQ+ youth are disproportionately represented among homeless populations, often as a result of family rejection or discrimination. Homelessness can have significant economic consequences, including limited access to stable employment and financial resources. Policy and Advocacy Efforts: Advocacy organizations and policymakers have called attention to economic disparities within the LGBTQ+ community and advocated for policies to address these inequalities. Efforts to combat workplace discrimination, expand access to benefits, and promote economic inclusion for LGBTQ+ individuals are ongoing. o. How many people are LGBTQ ▪Changing rates •Especially for Gen Z Population Estimates: Various surveys and studies have attempted to estimate the size of the LGBTQ+ population. These estimates typically range from a few percentage points to around 10% of the population, depending on the methodology and definitions used. Changing Rates: There is evidence to suggest that the proportion of people identifying as LGBTQ+ has been increasing over time, particularly among younger generations. This trend may be influenced by factors such as greater societal acceptance, increased visibility of LGBTQ+ individuals in media and popular culture, and evolving attitudes toward sexual orientation and gender identity. Generational Differences: Generation Z, consisting of individuals born roughly between the mid-1990s and early 2010s, is often characterized by greater openness and acceptance of LGBTQ+ identities compared to older generations. Surveys and studies have shown that Generation Z is more likely to identify as LGBTQ+ or express support for LGBTQ+ rights compared to previous generations. Social Factors: Changes in societal attitudes, legal protections, and cultural norms have contributed to greater acceptance and visibility of LGBTQ+ identities. As a result, more people may feel comfortable openly identifying as LGBTQ+ or exploring their sexual orientation and gender identity. Intersectionality: It's important to recognize that LGBTQ+ identities intersect with other aspects of identity, such as race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and disability. Rates of LGBTQ+ identification and experiences of discrimination may vary within and across different demographic groups. o. Heterosexism o. Homophobia, hate crimes, and discrim Heterosexism refers to the belief in and promotion of heterosexuality as the norm or superior sexual orientation, while marginalizing or discriminating against other sexual orientations. This ideology can manifest in various ways, including homophobia, hate crimes, and discrimination. Here's a breakdown: Homophobia: This is an irrational fear, hatred, or discomfort toward individuals who are perceived as being gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender. Homophobia can lead to prejudice, discrimination, and violence against LGBTQ+ individuals. It may be fueled by ignorance, cultural norms, religious beliefs, or personal biases. Hate Crimes: Hate crimes are criminal acts motivated by bias or prejudice against a particular group, including LGBTQ+ individuals. These crimes can range from verbal harassment and physical assault to vandalism, sexual assault, or even murder. Hate crimes targeting LGBTQ+ individuals often stem from homophobia and transphobia and can have devastating effects on individuals and communities. Discrimination: LGBTQ+ individuals may face discrimination in various areas of life, including employment, housing, education, healthcare, and public accommodations. Heterosexism can manifest in policies, practices, and social attitudes that favor heterosexual individuals while disadvantaging or excluding LGBTQ+ individuals. Discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity is often illegal in many jurisdictions, but it still persists in many forms. •Sex- Frequency and patterns o. Difference in reporting o. Contemporary rates and patterns for Gen Z and Millennials o. Changes in dating and partnering Discussions around sex, its frequency, patterns, and changes in contemporary rates and patterns among different generations, particularly Gen Z (born roughly between the mid-to-late 1990s and early 2010s) and Millennials (born roughly between the early 1980s and mid-to-late 1990s), often involve several key points: Difference in Reporting: There's often a difference in how different generations report their sexual behaviors. For example, older generations may be more conservative or private about discussing their sexual activities, while younger generations, such as Gen Z, may be more open and transparent about their experiences, thanks in part to the normalization of discussions around sex in popular culture, social media, and the internet. Contemporary Rates and Patterns: Studies have shown that there are shifts in sexual behaviors and attitudes among younger generations compared to older ones. For instance, surveys suggest that Gen Z and Millennials may be having sex less frequently than previous generations did at the same age. Factors contributing to this trend may include increased access to technology, changing social norms around relationships and sexuality, and concerns about sexual health and consent. Changes in Dating and Partnering: With the rise of dating apps and online platforms, there have been significant changes in how people meet and form relationships. Gen Z and Millennials are more likely to meet potential partners online than through traditional means like mutual friends or social events. This shift has also led to changes in dating dynamics, with some research suggesting that younger generations are more likely to engage in casual relationships or hookups rather than long-term commitments. ▪Changes in sexual frequency Changes in sexual frequency refer to shifts or variations in how often individuals engage in sexual activity over time. Several factors can influence changes in sexual frequency, including societal norms, cultural attitudes toward sex, individual preferences, relationship dynamics, health considerations, and external stressors. Here are some key points regarding changes in sexual frequency: Generational Shifts: Research suggests that there have been generational differences in sexual frequency. For example, some studies indicate that younger generations, such as Millennials and Gen Z, may be having sex less frequently than previous generations did at the same age. This trend could be attributed to various factors, including increased use of technology, changes in dating practices, and shifting societal attitudes toward sex. Relationship Status: Changes in relationship status can impact sexual frequency. For example, individuals in long-term relationships or marriages may experience fluctuations in sexual activity over time due to factors such as work stress, family responsibilities, or changes in emotional intimacy. Conversely, individuals who are single or casually dating may have more variability in their sexual frequency depending on their social and dating experiences. Health Factors: Physical and mental health can influence sexual frequency. Health conditions, medications, hormonal changes, and psychological factors such as stress, anxiety, or depression can affect libido and sexual desire, leading to changes in sexual activity levels. Additionally, experiences such as pregnancy, childbirth, and menopause can also impact sexual frequency for individuals and couples. Social and Cultural Factors: Societal norms, cultural attitudes, and media representations of sex can influence individuals' perceptions and behaviors regarding sexual activity. Changes in social norms around sexuality, gender roles, and relationship dynamics may contribute to shifts in sexual frequency among different demographic groups. Technological Influence: The widespread availability of digital media and online platforms has reshaped how people connect and interact, including in the realm of sexuality. The rise of social media, dating apps, and online pornography may impact sexual behaviors and attitudes, potentially affecting sexual frequency among different populations. Vocabulary •Biological Notions Of Race Biological notions of race refer to perspectives that view race as a biological or genetic category, often emphasizing physical differences among human populations. These perspectives typically posit that there are distinct and significant biological differences between racial groups, such as variations in genetic makeup, physiology, or disease susceptibility. •Social Construct A social construct refers to a concept or idea that is created and defined by society, rather than being inherent to the natural world. These constructs are shaped by social, cultural, historical, and political factors, and they vary across different societies and contexts. Social constructs are often accepted as reality by members of a society, influencing beliefs, attitudes, behaviors, and social interactions. •Social Construction Of Race The social construction of race refers to the process by which societal beliefs, categories, and meanings about race are created, shaped, and perpetuated within a particular cultural and historical context. Unlike biological notions of race, which posit that race is a fixed and objective category based on physical or genetic differences, the social constructionist perspective emphasizes that race is a product of social, cultural, and political forces rather than biological reality. •Racial Formation Theory Racial Formation Theory, developed by sociologists Michael Omi and Howard Winant in the late 20th century, is a conceptual framework that seeks to understand how race and racial categories are socially constructed and transformed over time. The theory emphasizes the dynamic and contingent nature of race, highlighting how racial identities, meanings, and hierarchies are produced, contested, and reconfigured within specific historical and social contexts. •Ethnicity Ethnicity refers to the cultural, social, and sometimes biological characteristics that distinguish one group of people from another. It is a complex and multifaceted concept that encompasses shared ancestry, language, religion, customs, traditions, and other cultural practices. Unlike race, which is often understood in terms of physical or biological traits, ethnicity is primarily based on cultural affiliation and identification. •Globalization Globalization refers to the increasing interconnectedness and interdependence of societies and economies around the world. It involves the exchange of goods, services, information, technology, culture, and ideas on a global scale, leading to the integration of economies and societies into a single global system. Key aspects of globalization include: •Immigration o. Legal (Voluntary) o. Illegal (Voluntary) o. Forced Immigration refers to the act of individuals or groups moving from one country to another to reside there permanently or temporarily. Immigration can occur for various reasons, including economic opportunities, family reunification, seeking asylum or refuge, or fleeing persecution, conflict, or environmental disasters. There are three broad categories of immigration: Legal Immigration (Voluntary): Legal immigration occurs when individuals enter a country with the proper authorization and documentation, such as visas, work permits, or residency permits. This type of immigration is voluntary and typically follows established immigration laws and regulations of the destination country. Legal immigrants often come to pursue education, and work opportunities, join family members, or seek refuge through legal channels. Illegal Immigration (Voluntary): Illegal immigration, also known as undocumented or irregular migration, refers to the movement of individuals across national borders without proper authorization or documentation under the destination country's immigration laws. This type of immigration is voluntary but violates the immigration laws of the destination country. Reasons for illegal immigration may include economic factors, lack of legal pathways for migration, family reunification, or fleeing violence or persecution. Illegal immigrants often face risks such as exploitation, deportation, detention, and limited access to essential services. Forced Immigration: Forced immigration occurs when individuals are compelled to leave their home countries against their will due to persecution, conflict, environmental disasters, or other circumstances that threaten their safety, security, or well-being. This type of immigration is involuntary and may involve refugees, asylum seekers, internally displaced persons (IDPs), or victims of human trafficking. Forced immigrants often seek protection and assistance from international organizations, such as the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and may eventually be resettled in a third country or return home when conditions improve. •Emigration Emigration refers to the act of individuals or groups leaving their country of origin to settle in another country. It involves the permanent or long-term relocation of people from their home country to a new destination. Emigration is the opposite of immigration, which involves individuals or groups entering a new country to reside there. •Refugee (as defined by the US) In the United States, a refugee is defined as a person who is outside their country of nationality or habitual residence due to a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion, and who is unable or unwilling to return to that country. Refugees are granted legal protection and assistance under international law, including the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol, to which the United States is a signatory. To be recognized as a refugee in the United States, individuals must undergo a thorough screening process conducted by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) or the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), depending on the circumstances. This process involves interviews, background checks, and verification of the individual's refugee status. Once granted refugee status, individuals may be eligible for resettlement in the United States, where they receive assistance with housing, employment, education, and other services to help them rebuild their lives. Refugees differ from other categories of migrants, such as immigrants and asylum seekers, in that they have been forced to flee their home countries due to persecution or violence and are unable to return safely. As such, they are afforded specific legal protections and rights under international and domestic law. •Remittance Remittance refers to the transfer of money or other assets by a person living and working in one country to their family or others residing in their country of origin. It is a vital source of financial support for many families in developing countries, where remittances often constitute a significant portion of the national income. Remittances can be sent through various channels, including banks, money transfer operators (MTOs), online platforms, and informal channels such as friends or relatives carrying cash. The funds sent as remittances are typically used by recipients to cover essential expenses such as food, housing, education, healthcare, and investments in small businesses or agriculture. Remittances play a crucial role in poverty reduction and economic development in recipient countries, providing a lifeline for millions of households and contributing to local economies through increased consumption and investment. Additionally, remittances can help reduce inequality by redistributing wealth from higher-income countries to lower-income countries. For many migrants, sending remittances is a way to fulfill their financial obligations to their families and communities back home and to support their loved ones' well-being and aspirations. Governments and international organizations often support policies and initiatives aimed at facilitating remittance flows, reducing transfer costs, and promoting financial inclusion among migrant populations. •Model Minority The term "model minority" refers to a demographic group, typically an ethnic or racial minority, that is perceived as achieving a higher degree of socioeconomic success than the population average. This term is often applied to Asian Americans in the United States, but it can also be used to describe other groups in various countries. Characteristics commonly associated with the model minority stereotype include high levels of educational attainment, strong work ethic, stable family structures, and economic success. The model minority stereotype suggests that members of these groups have overcome discrimination and adversity through hard work, perseverance, and adherence to cultural values such as emphasis on education and strong family ties. •Assimilation o. Downward Assimilation Assimilation is a process through which individuals or groups adopt the cultural norms, values, and behaviors of the dominant society. It involves the integration of minority or immigrant groups into the mainstream culture of a society. Assimilation can occur voluntarily as individuals or groups seek to adapt to their new environment, or it can be enforced through social, economic, or political pressures. Downward assimilation refers to a situation in which individuals or groups adopt the norms and values of a lower socioeconomic status group rather than those of the dominant society. This can occur when individuals or groups face barriers to upward mobility or experience discrimination and marginalization within the dominant culture. Downward assimilation may involve adopting behaviors, attitudes, or lifestyles associated with poverty or social disadvantage. Downward assimilation can be a response to socioeconomic inequality, limited opportunities for social mobility, or experiences of discrimination and marginalization. It may also reflect a sense of alienation or disconnection from the dominant culture, leading individuals or groups to identify more closely with subcultures or communities that share similar experiences or values. While assimilation is often seen as a way for immigrants or minority groups to achieve social and economic success in their new society, downward assimilation highlights the complexities and challenges that individuals or groups may face in the process of integration. It underscores the importance of addressing structural inequalities and promoting social inclusion to ensure that all members of society have equal opportunities to thrive. •Paradigm o. Paradigm Shift A paradigm is a set of beliefs, assumptions, and practices that define how a particular discipline or field of study approaches problems and generates knowledge. It serves as a framework for understanding and interpreting phenomena within that discipline. A paradigm shift refers to a fundamental change in the basic assumptions, concepts, and practices of a scientific or intellectual framework. It occurs when new discoveries, theories, or perspectives challenge the existing paradigm and lead to a reevaluation of fundamental concepts and methods. •Gender Gender refers to the social, cultural, and behavioral characteristics, roles, and expectations that societies attribute to individuals based on their perceived sex. While sex typically refers to biological differences, such as chromosomes, hormones, and reproductive anatomy, gender encompasses a broader range of characteristics and identities. •Gender Expression Gender expression refers to the outward manifestation of an individual's gender identity, typically through behavior, clothing, hairstyle, voice, or other aspects of appearance and presentation. It encompasses the ways in which individuals express their gender to others and may include both intentional and unintentional cues that communicate aspects of their gender identity. •Gender Identity Gender identity refers to a person's deeply-felt internal sense of their own gender, which may be male, female, a blend of both, or neither. It is an intrinsic aspect of individual identity and may or may not correspond with the sex assigned to them at birth. Gender identity is distinct from biological sex, which is typically assigned based on physical characteristics such as anatomy and chromosomes. •Sexual Identity Sexual identity refers to an individual's enduring pattern of romantic or sexual attraction, as well as their sense of self in relation to that attraction. It encompasses the internal understanding of one's sexual orientation and may include categories such as heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, pansexual, asexual, and more. •Sexuality Sexuality refers to the complex interplay of biological, psychological, social, cultural, and emotional factors that shape an individual's experience of their sexual desires, attractions, behaviors, and relationships. It encompasses a wide range of dimensions, including but not limited to: •Sex Sex, in the context of human behavior and relationships, refers to a broad range of physical, emotional, and social aspects related to sexual activity, attraction, and expression. •Self-policing Self-policing refers to the practice of individuals or groups regulating their own behavior, actions, or attitudes according to internal standards, values, or norms, rather than relying solely on external laws, rules, or authorities for guidance or enforcement. It involves taking personal responsibility for one's actions and adhering to ethical principles or social expectations without the need for external coercion or supervision. •Gender Queer Genderqueer is a term used to describe individuals whose gender identity does not conform to traditional binary notions of male and female. Genderqueer people may identify as a blend of both genders, as neither exclusively male nor female, or as a different gender entirely. They may reject the idea of fixed gender categories altogether and view gender as fluid and non-binary. •Gender Binary The gender binary refers to the classification of gender into two distinct and opposite categories: male and female. It's a cultural, societal, and often institutional framework that assumes there are only two genders, each associated with specific roles, behaviors, attributes, and expectations. This binary understanding of gender typically aligns with biological sex assigned at birth, where individuals are categorized as either male or female based on physical characteristics such as genitalia and chromosomes. •Man Box o. Tony Porter The "Man Box" is a concept popularized by Tony Porter, an activist and educator known for his work in promoting healthy, respectful, and equitable notions of masculinity. The term refers to a set of societal expectations, norms, and stereotypes that prescribe how men should behave, think, and feel. These expectations are often rigid and restrictive, dictating that men should conform to certain ideals of masculinity while suppressing traits or behaviors that are perceived as feminine or weak. •Hierarchy Hierarchy refers to a system or structure in which people or groups are ranked according to their status, authority, or importance relative to one another. It often involves a vertical arrangement, with individuals or entities positioned at different levels based on criteria such as power, wealth, social class, or organizational position. •Ascribed Identity An ascribed identity is a social identity that is assigned to an individual based on characteristics such as age, race, ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status, over which the individual may have little or no control. These identities are typically attributed to individuals at birth or early in life and are often based on external factors such as physical appearance, family background, or cultural heritage. •Achieved Identity An achieved identity is a social identity that an individual acquires through their own actions, efforts, choices, and accomplishments. Unlike ascribed identities, which are assigned to individuals based on factors such as race, gender, or socioeconomic status, achieved identities are developed over time through personal agency and interaction with one's environment. •Queer Theory o. A conflict theory where the conflict is the level of patriarchy o. Judith Butler Queer theory is a theoretical framework within gender studies and sociology that challenges traditional understandings of gender and sexuality. Developed primarily in the late 20th century, queer theory emerged as a response to the limitations of earlier feminist and gay/lesbian theories, which tended to essentialize gender and sexual identities. At its core, queer theory seeks to deconstruct binary categories such as male/female and gay/straight, as well as the norms and power structures associated with them. It questions the idea of fixed, natural, or essential identities, arguing instead that identities are fluid, socially constructed, and context-dependent. •Homophobia Homophobia refers to a range of negative attitudes, feelings, and behaviors directed towards individuals who are perceived to be gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT), as well as towards same-sex relationships or behaviors. It encompasses prejudice, discrimination, and hostility based on a person's sexual orientation or gender identity. •Heterosexism Heterosexism refers to the belief in and privileging of heterosexuality as the normative and superior sexual orientation, while marginalizing and stigmatizing non-heterosexual identities. It operates on the assumption that heterosexuality is the only natural or acceptable form of sexual orientation, leading to discrimination, prejudice, and the exclusion of LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other non-heterosexual or non-cisgender) individuals. •Culture Culture encompasses the shared beliefs, values, norms, customs, traditions, language, symbols, and practices that are learned and transmitted within a particular social group or community. It shapes individuals' identities, behaviors, and worldviews, influencing how people perceive themselves and others, interact with one another, and interpret the world around them. •FCC The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is an independent agency of the United States government that regulates interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable. It was established by the Communications Act of 1934 and is charged with overseeing various aspects of telecommunications and broadcasting to ensure the public interest is served. •Fairness Doctrine o. Repeal of and effects of repeal The Fairness Doctrine was a policy introduced by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 1949 to ensure that broadcasters presented balanced and fair coverage of controversial issues. It required broadcasters to devote airtime to discussing contrasting views on matters of public importance and to provide an opportunity for opposing viewpoints to be heard. Key points about the Fairness Doctrine include: Intent: The Fairness Doctrine aimed to promote the public interest by ensuring that the public had access to a diverse range of viewpoints on important issues. It was based on the principle that broadcasters, who held licenses to use the public airwaves, had an obligation to serve the public interest. Requirements: Under the Fairness Doctrine, broadcasters were required to cover controversial issues of public importance and to provide reasonable opportunities for contrasting viewpoints to be presented. This often meant offering airtime to individuals or groups with differing perspectives on the issue being discussed. Implementation: The Fairness Doctrine was enforced through FCC regulations, and broadcasters found to be in violation of the doctrine could face penalties, including the potential loss of their broadcast licenses. Repeal: The Fairness Doctrine came under increasing criticism in the 1980s from both conservative and liberal groups, who argued that it infringed on broadcasters' First Amendment rights and stifled free speech. In 1987, the FCC under Chairman Dennis R. Patrick abolished the Fairness Doctrine, citing changes in the media landscape, including the rise of cable television and the growth of alternative sources of information. Effects of Repeal: The repeal of the Fairness Doctrine led to significant changes in the media environment, particularly in talk radio and television news. Without the requirement to provide balanced coverage of controversial issues, broadcasters had more freedom to air programming reflecting a particular ideological viewpoint, leading to the rise of opinion-driven, partisan media outlets. Some critics argue that the repeal contributed to increased polarization and the spread of misinformation in the media landscape. •Propaganda Propaganda refers to information, ideas, or messages spread with the intention of influencing people's opinions, beliefs, or actions in a particular direction, often to promote a specific agenda or ideology. It can take various forms, including written or spoken communication, images, videos, and other media formats. •Media conglomeration (Also called Media Consolidation) Media conglomeration, also known as media consolidation, refers to the process by which ownership and control of media companies become concentrated in the hands of a few large corporations or conglomerates. This trend has been increasingly prominent in the media industry, particularly in recent decades, driven by factors such as deregulation, technological advancements, and the pursuit of economies of scale. •Vertical integration Vertical integration is a business strategy in which a company extends its operations along the supply chain by acquiring or merging with companies that are involved in different stages of the production process. Rather than just focusing on one aspect of production, such as manufacturing or distribution, a vertically integrated company controls multiple stages of the supply chain, from raw materials to the final product or service delivered to the customer. •Horizontal integration Horizontal integration is a business strategy in which a company expands its presence in the same stage of the production process or industry value chain by acquiring or merging with competitors or companies operating in the same industry. Unlike vertical integration, which involves expanding into different stages of the production process (such as upstream suppliers or downstream distribution channels), horizontal integration focuses on consolidating firms that operate at the same level of the value chain. •Monopoly A monopoly is a market structure characterized by a single seller dominating the entire market for a particular product or service. In a monopoly, the single seller faces no competition, giving it significant control over the price and quantity of goods or services sold. Monopolies can arise due to various factors, including barriers to entry, economies of scale, control over essential resources, or government regulations. •Mass Media Mass media refers to various forms of communication that reach large audiences simultaneously. These channels include newspapers, magazines, radio, television, and the internet. Mass media play a crucial role in shaping public opinion, disseminating information, influencing social norms, and facilitating cultural exchange on a global scale. •Mainstream Media Mainstream media refers to large-scale, widely recognized media outlets that reach a broad audience and typically adhere to established journalistic practices and professional standards. These media organizations include newspapers, television networks, radio stations, magazines, and online news websites that are well-known and widely consumed by the general public. •Independent Media Independent media refers to media outlets that operate free from corporate or government influence and are often characterized by their commitment to journalistic integrity, editorial independence, and diverse perspectives. Unlike mainstream media, which may be owned by large corporations or conglomerates and subject to commercial pressures, independent media organizations prioritize principles such as transparency, accountability, and serving the public interest. •Social Media Social media refers to online platforms and services that allow users to create, share, and interact with content and other users in virtual communities. These platforms enable individuals and groups to connect, communicate, collaborate, and engage with each other in various forms of digital interaction. Social media has become an integral part of modern communication, influencing how people connect, consume information, and participate in social, cultural, and political activities. •Media Literacy Media literacy refers to the ability to access, analyze, evaluate, and critically interpret various forms of media content, including print, broadcast, digital, and social media. It involves understanding how media messages are created, disseminated, and consumed, as well as recognizing the influence of media on individuals, society, and culture. Media literacy empowers individuals to become informed, discerning, and responsible media consumers and creators by developing essential skills and competencies related to media literacy include: •Digital Divide The digital divide refers to the gap between those who have access to digital technologies, such as computers, smartphones, and the internet, and those who do not. This gap can exist within and between countries, regions, communities, socioeconomic groups, and demographic populations. The digital divide encompasses disparities in access to digital infrastructure, connectivity, devices, skills, and digital literacy, which can hinder individuals' ability to participate fully in the digital age and benefit from the opportunities offered by digital technologies. •Internet Addiction Internet addiction, also known as problematic internet use or internet gaming disorder, refers to excessive, compulsive, and uncontrollable use of the internet, leading to negative consequences in various areas of an individual's life, including personal, social, academic, and occupational functioning. It is characterized by a preoccupation with internet activities, loss of control over internet use, withdrawal symptoms when internet access is restricted, and continued use despite experiencing adverse effects. •Demography Demography is the scientific study of human populations, including their size, structure, distribution, composition, and dynamics over time. It encompasses a wide range of topics related to population dynamics, such as birth rates, death rates, migration patterns, fertility rates, age distribution, and demographic trends. •Overpopulation Overpopulation refers to a situation where the number of people in a given area exceeds the carrying capacity of the environment, leading to various negative consequences. It is typically characterized by an imbalance between the human population and the available resources and infrastructure needed to support it sustainably. •Flattening "Flattening" can refer to several concepts depending on the context: Flattening the Curve: In the context of public health, "flattening the curve" refers to efforts to slow the spread of a contagious disease, such as COVID-19, in order to reduce the peak number of cases and prevent overwhelming healthcare systems. This is typically achieved through measures such as social distancing, mask-wearing, hand hygiene, quarantine, and vaccination. Flattening the Organization: In business or management contexts, "flattening the organization" refers to reducing hierarchical layers or levels within a company or institution. This can involve decentralizing decision-making, empowering employees, streamlining communication channels, and eliminating unnecessary bureaucracy in order to increase efficiency, responsiveness, and innovation. Flattening the Earth: In the context of globalization and technology, "flattening the earth" is a concept popularized by Thomas Friedman in his book "The World is Flat." It refers to the leveling effect of globalization and digital technology, which has enabled greater connectivity, communication, and competition on a global scale. This has led to increased interconnectedness, economic integration, and cultural exchange among people and nations •Urbanization o. Overurbanization Urbanization refers to the process by which an increasing proportion of a population migrates from rural to urban areas, resulting in the growth of cities and towns. This phenomenon is typically driven by factors such as industrialization, economic development, job opportunities, better infrastructure, and improved living standards in urban areas. Overurbanization, on the other hand, refers to a situation where urban growth outpaces the capacity of infrastructure, resources, and services to support it. This can lead to various challenges and problems, including overcrowding, inadequate housing, traffic congestion, pollution, strained public services, and social inequalities. Overurbanization often occurs in developing countries where urbanization is rapid and unplanned, resulting in slums, informal settlements, and other urban problems. Efforts to address overurbanization typically involve urban planning, infrastructure development, social programs, and policies to promote sustainable urban growth and improve living conditions for urban residents. •Gentrification Gentrification is a process of urban development whereby previously neglected or economically disadvantaged neighborhoods undergo revitalization, typically resulting in an influx of wealthier residents and businesses. This transformation often leads to increased property values, improved infrastructure, and cultural changes in the area. •Separation of Spheres o. Peak of rigidly defined gender roles in American and other developed countries The peak of rigidly defined gender roles in American and other developed countries is typically associated with the mid-20th century, particularly in the post-World War II era up until the 1960s. During this time, there was a strong societal emphasis on traditional gender norms, with distinct expectations and roles for men and women. ▪1950’s The 1950s in the United States is often characterized as a period of post-World War II prosperity and cultural conservatism. Here are some key aspects of the 1950s: Economic Boom: The 1950s saw significant economic growth in the United States, fueled by the post-war industrial boom. This period is often referred to as the "Golden Age of Capitalism" or the "Economic Miracle." The GI Bill provided educational and housing benefits to returning veterans, contributing to a rise in homeownership and the expansion of the middle class. Suburbanization: The 1950s witnessed a mass migration of Americans from cities to suburbs. Suburbanization was driven by factors such as the availability of affordable housing, government subsidies for suburban development, and the desire for a more peaceful and family-oriented lifestyle. Levittown, New York, became a symbol of suburban expansion with its mass-produced, affordable housing developments. Baby Boom: The post-war period also saw a significant increase in birth rates, known as the "baby boom." Returning servicemen started families, leading to a surge in childbirth rates that lasted throughout the 1950s. Cultural Conservatism: The 1950s is often depicted as a time of cultural conformity and conservatism. Traditional gender roles were reinforced, with men as breadwinners and women as homemakers. The nuclear family model, consisting of a husband, wife, and children, was idealized. Cold War Era: The 1950s were marked by the height of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union. The fear of communism led to anti-communist hysteria and the rise of McCarthyism, characterized by investigations into alleged communist influence in American society. Civil Rights Movement: The 1950s laid the groundwork for the civil rights movement, which sought to end racial segregation and discrimination against African Americans. Landmark events such as the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision (1954) and the Montgomery Bus Boycott (1955-1956) set the stage for the activism of the 1960s. Popular Culture: The 1950s saw the rise of television as a dominant form of entertainment, with shows like "I Love Lucy," "The Ed Sullivan Show," and "Leave It to Beaver" capturing the imagination of American audiences. Rock and roll music also emerged as a powerful cultural force, with artists like Elvis Presley revolutionizing the music industry. •I-gen "I-Gen" is a term sometimes used to refer to the generation of individuals born between the mid-to-late 1990s and the mid-2010s. This generation is also commonly known as Generation Z or Gen Z. The prefix "i" may stand for various things, including "internet," "individualistic," or "information," reflecting the generation's relationship with technology and their status as digital natives. o. Jean Twenge Jean Twenge is a psychologist and author known for her research on generational differences, particularly focusing on the characteristics and behaviors of millennials and Generation Z. She has written several books on the subject, including "Generation Me" and "iGen: Why Today's Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy — and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood." Twenge's work often explores how cultural and societal factors, such as technology, parenting styles, and economic conditions, influence the attitudes and behaviors of different generations. She has conducted extensive research using large-scale surveys to identify trends and patterns in generational shifts, drawing attention to changes in areas such as mental health, self-esteem, and social relationships. While Twenge's research has garnered attention for highlighting some of the challenges and concerns associated with younger generations, such as increased rates of anxiety and depression, her work has also sparked debate and criticism within the field of psychology and sociology. Some scholars have questioned the generalizations made about entire generations and the potential oversimplification of complex societal phenomena. Nonetheless, Twenge's work continues to be influential in discussions about generational differences and the impact of cultural change on individuals' lives. REFRESH ON Sociological imagination, Sociological perspectives, 7 up films
flashcards Flashcard (73)
studied byStudied by 16 people
306 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
861 days ago
0.0(0)

Notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
1 hour ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
3 hours ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
20 hours ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
20 hours ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
21 hours ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
21 hours ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
21 hours ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
1 day ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
2 days ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
3 days ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
3 days ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
3 days ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
3 days ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
3 days ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
3 days ago
0.0(0)
Skip to main content CloseBlackboard Learn NOMTHANDAZO DLADLA Activity Courses Calendar Messages Grades Tools Sign Out Privacy Terms Accessibility Menu Courses Skip to main content 2025_SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE 1 Course Faculty Ms. LINDI MANDA Instructor Details & Actions Course Description View the course description Progress Tracking On Class Collaborate Join session Attendance View your attendance Books & Tools View course & institution tools Course Content × LEARNING UNIT 1: INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE People cannot, not connect Introduction The Social intelligence (SI) study is geared towards equipping learners to acquire the ability to cope well with others and sharpen their interpersonal practical skills (situational awareness, presence, authenticity, clarity and empathy [S.P.A.C.E.]) in order to succeed effectively in various settings (Albrecht 1930). The holistic model - S.P.A.C.E. used in this study is for outlining, determining, and advancing SI at personal level, and it‘s shared to offer guidelines on using it as an effective diagnostic formula and developmental tool for professional and personal success. This is customized from Karl Albrecht‘s work on Social Intelligence. S.P.A.C.E. – As a different kind of smart refers to: S – Situational awareness: knowledge of, attentive to and wise about various contexts and the stimuli they exert and the reactions that arise from such stimuli P - Presence: the manner in which a person affects individuals or groups through physical appearance, mood and demeanour, and body language and how he/she occupies space in an environment A – Authenticity: honesty and sincerity C – Clarity: ability to express one‘s thoughts, opinions, ideas, and intentions clearly; comprehension of the power of languages as a medium of thought and expression; and to use language in ways that meet their needs E – Empathy: ability to be truly aware and considerate of other peoples by tuning their feelings to those of the affected persons. Some questions that arise out of all this are: 1. Where does the concept of social intelligence fit into the field of engineering? 2. How does it apply in an engineer‘s job? 3. How does it apply to the way people work together? 4. Does it apply to the way teams accomplish their missions, to the way employees serve clients, and/or the ways in which bosses and employees interact? 5. Does it apply more broadly across the ―society‖ that exists in every established organization? This module consists of the two parts: Topic 1: Introduction to Social Intelligence It offers a theoretical background to social intelligence in general Topic 2: Social Intelligence and Engineering A discussion of social intelligence broadly built around interactive activities for students to develop the relevant 21st century graduate‘s skills. Introduction to Social Intelligence While you‘re born with your own intelligence or IQ, Social Intelligence is mostly learned. It is considered as the capacity to know oneself, others and things around them. SI develops from experience with others and learning from occurrences, mishaps and successes in social settings. Simply, social intelligence can be regarded as what‘s known as ―tact‖ or ―common sense‖ or even ―street marts.‖ While societies put a huge focus on book smarts and IQ, what‘s often overlooked is that, people‘s lives are largely influenced by their relationships with one another. Mistakenly, many still believe that a measurement of one‘s smartness is through books. Contrary, research has revealed that true intelligence isn‘t only about books smart but also about street smarts. Along with this; it has also been determined that building strong social relationships is worth the effort because of various benefits including the following: · Good relationships are effective for a person because they help to boost their immune system and therefore, assist in combating diseases. · Whenever one has healthy relationships, they will always have to talk to and so, help them deal with major sources of stress, health problems and depression which can be associated to loneliness and poor relationships. · Individuals‘ daily lives are affected by the relationships they have with their significant others, such as boyfriends, spouse, children, parents, colleagues and friends. There are various perspectives on social intelligence and two dominant views are of psychometric and personality, of which are contrary on many crucial points, such as comparative assessment of individuals, but they later agree in recent work on the development of social intelligence (for reviews, see Greenspan, 1979; Greenspan, 1997). Nevertheless, that is beyond the scope of this module. Here, the concentration is on helping students develop as possible as they can, rather than turning them into SI‘s experts. 1.1 The Nature of Social Intelligence The origin of its definition is traced back in 1920 to the psychologist, Edward Thorndike who claimed that it is ―the ability to understand and manage men and women and girls, to act wisely in human relations.‖ Later in the 1930s Moss and Hunt argued that social intelligence is ―the ability to get along with others.‖ Along with this, Vernon in 1930s also described it as being ―reflected in the general ability to get along with people in general, social technique or ease in society, knowledge of social matters and susceptibility to stimuli from other members of a group, as well as insight into the temporary moods or underlying personality traits of strangers.‖ Thus, according to these authors, social intelligence bears both the cognitive features (the ability to understand people) and practical features (ability to deal with and respond towards them). However, social intelligence is often confused with various intelligences such as emotional intelligence, collective intelligence or group intelligence. Perhaps, this influenced the follow up work by Gardner in the 1980s which looked at the model of multiple intelligences with intrapersonal and interpersonal as part of them. Accordingly, he argued that ―social intelligence allows people to take advantage of the resources of others. We are finding that much of people‘s effective intelligence is, in a sense, outside the brain. This means, you can use intelligence for other people, if you know how to reach it and how to use it. Therefore, the best strategy is to mobilize other people around you.‖ Gardner purported that interpersonal intelligence covers the ability to read other people‘s moods, motives and other mental states; and intrapersonal includes the ability to access and assess one‘s own feelings and to draw on them to guide behaviour. He also viewed as the basis of emotional intelligence (EI) with a greater focus on cognition and understanding than feeling. According to Ford and Tisak, social intelligence (SI) has both convergent and divergent validity, as a better predictor of behavioural measure of social effectiveness than academic intelligence. A glaring common agreement is that SI is the ability to effectively plan and direct complicated social relationships and social realities in various environments. Honeywill suggests that it can also be regarded as is ―an aggregated measure of self and social-awareness, evolved social beliefs and attitudes and a capacity and appetite to manage complex social change.‖ Along this, Nicholas Humphrey claimed that SI defines human beings more than quantitative intelligence. In support, Gerdner indicated that SI is equivalent to interpersonal intelligence and also closely related to theory of mind. Combined proponents of SI agreed that it is distinct from general intelligence and may serve as a better predictor of behaviour. According to Zaccaro et al (1990) socially-intelligent individuals are aware of the social situation, including the problems and needs of others (social perceptiveness). They are also able to behave appropriately for different social situations (behavioral flexibility). Thus, these aspects can be seen through a) Social understanding and b) Situational-appropriate behaviour. Along with this, Kosmitzki and John described a socially intelligent person as the one who: · Understands people‘s thoughts, feelings and intentions well; · Is good at dealing with people; · Has extensive knowledge of the rules and norms in human relations; · Is good at taking the perspective of other people; · Adapts well in social situations; · Is warm and caring; and · Is open to new experiences, ideas and values. While embracing social intelligence, Salovey and Mayer in their work considered emotional intelligence as a part of social intelligence. According to them, it includes the ability to monitor feelings and emotions of themselves and others. It is the ability to distinguish between signals and use this information to manage thoughts and actions of others. Social intelligence is the ability to use emotional intelligence in social situations. It incorporates interaction with others and readiness to estimate the social situation around. However, Boyatzis and Sala purported that the problem in calling Social Intelligence as ‗intelligence‘ was to test it on the criteria of ‗intelligence‘. These researchers highlighted that, it had to be classified as an ‗intelligence‘, a concept should be: 1. Behaviourally observable 2. Related to biological and in particular neural-endocrine functioning. That is, each cluster should be differentiated as to the type of neural circuitry and endocrine system involved 3. Related to life and job outcomes 4. Sufficiently different from other personality constructs so that the concept adds value to understanding the human personality and behaviour 5. The measures of the concept, as a psychological construct, should satisfy the basic criteria for a sound measure, that is show convergent and discriminant validity. Accordingly, Goleman addressed this call by looking through biological research and focused on the neural endocrine functioning regards social intelligence. As a result, in his work he highlights that social intelligence is explains in terms of neurology and this fulfils Boyatsi‘s and Sala‘s need for social intelligence to qualify as an intelligence. Additionally, Albrecht expanded the research on multiple intelligences and identified that human beings have six basic dimension of intelligence. Among these, social intelligence is one of them, defined as ―Interacting successfully with others in various contexts‖, with a close term Emotional Intelligence defined as ―Self-insight and the ability to regulate or manage one‘s reactions to experience‖. In addition, Seal et al claimed that the term was defined as the behavioural manifestations of the interpersonal awareness of others‘ emotions, needs, thoughts, and perceptions as well as navigate the larger social environment and working with others. Goleman (2006) and Boyatzis and Goleman (2006) reclassified their array of competencies and clusters into two distinct aspects. The interpersonal clusters (social awareness and relationship management) were relabeled social intelligence (SI) competencies; and the intrapersonal clusters (self-awareness and self- management) were relabeled emotional intelligence(EI) competencies. The new term, emotional and social intelligence (ESI) helps to differentiate the behavioral manifestations of the intrapersonal awareness and management of emotions within the self (EI) from the behavioral manifestations of the interpersonal awareness of others’ emotions, needs, thoughts, and perceptions as well as navigate the larger social environment and working with others (SI). This integrated concept of ESI offers more than a convenient framework for describing human dispositions—it offers a theoretical structure for the organization of personality and linking it to a theory of action and job performance. This helped it get positioned as a competency as well. As, according to Boyatzis, a competency is an ―underlying characteristic of the person that leads to or causes effective or superior performance‖ therefore, an ESI competency got defined as an ability to recognize, understand, and use emotional information about oneself (EI) or others(SI) that leads to or causes effective or superior performance. The correlation of social and emotional intelligence approach is clearly reflected by Bar-On, who uses the concept of emotional and social intelligence. This model includes set of interrelated emotional and social competencies that determine how effectively we understand and express ourselves, how we understand and get along with other people and how we handle daily activities. In practice, they can complement each other as they complement to the abstract intelligence. Human being is a solid personality whose career is hardly separable from personal or family life. Emotional intelligence is essential for human life, because it helps to perceive, understand and manage emotions. It represents a personal, natural wisdom that allows him to live life joyfully, to overcome and solve everyday problems and achieve success. Social intelligence is the ability to relate to people, perceive social situations and properly interpret them and react accordingly. It is the ability to create harmonious interpersonal relationships and the ability to solve conflicts. One component cannot exist without the other. This definition can be elaborated to ―how people handle themselves and their relationships‖, according to Goleman, Boyatzis, & McKee. So, ESI is a set of competencies, or abilities, organized along two distinct aspect (emotional and social) in how a person: (a) is aware of himself/herself; (b) manages him/herself; (c) is aware of others; and (d) manages his/her relationships with others. Building upon and integrating the competency research, Goleman, Boyatzis, and McKee presented a model of ESI with 18 competencies arrayed in four clusters and two aspects. Researcher Shaun identified socially intelligent people as: · They have confidence in social circumstances. · They have and demonstrate a genuine interest in their fellow beings. · They are capable of adapting, understanding and responding effectively. · They express their emotions and feelings clearly and appropriately with assertiveness. · They have an awareness of the internal and external locus of control. Karl Albrecht, around 2009, elaborated the five major dimensions of social intelligence as situational radar, presence/bearing, authenticity, clarity and empathy (can be seen as an acronym SPACE). 1. Situational Radar (Awareness): the ability to read situations, understand the social context and choose behavioral strategies that are most likely to be successful 2. Presence: the external sense of one‘s self that others perceive: confidence, bearing self- respect, and self-worth. 3. Authenticity: the opposite of being phony. Authenticity is a way of behaving which engenders a perception that one is honest with one‘s self as well as others. 4. Clarity: the ability to express one‘s self clearly, use language effectively, explain concepts clearly, and persuade with ideas. 5. Empathy: the ability to create a sense of connectedness with others; to get them on your wavelength and invite them to move with and toward you. In that decade, the consistent aspects of social intelligence among all researches were: the knowledge of the social situations, accurate interpretation of the social situation and the skills to behave appropriately in that social situation. Hopkins and Bilimoria opined that to be considered socially intelligent one has to be good at human relationships. Crowne defined it as the ability to interact effectively with others in any social situation. Emmerling and Boyatzis describe social intelligence competency as the ability to be aware of, understand and act on emotional information about others that leads to effective performance. Thus, what was proposed by Thorndike during the first half of the 1900s was initially perceived similarly as a single concept by fellow researchers. However, later others began to see social intelligence as a set of two personal intelligences, divided into interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligences that include knowledge about oneself and others. Many scholars proposed a number of different ways to be socially intelligent. It has been thought of as the ability to accomplish interpersonal tasks and to act wisely in relationships. It has been seen as a capability that allows one to produce adequate behaviour for the purpose of achieving a desired goal. It is thought that SI involves being intelligent in relationships. Some researchers even believed that the social facets of intelligence may be as important as the cognitive aspects. However, most of them agreed that the Social Intelligence includes knowledge of the social situations and the skill to perceive and interpret the situations accurately, for leading one to successfully behave in the situation. In other words, it has always been seen as an ability to interact effectively with others. In an important research, Süd, Weis, & Seidel focused on more of a potential-based concept of SI, rather than behavior-based approaches and the broader concept of social competence (i.e., including both cognitive and non-cognitive abilities and skills). In the potential-based approach, SI encompasses only the cognitive abilities as necessary prerequisites for social competent behavior. Consequently, social competent behavior is part of the external criterion, not the construct. Social competent behavior, on the other hand, depends on cognitive (i.e., SI) and non-cognitive prerequisites (e.g., intentions, motivation, personality traits, values, norms, etc.). Thus, SI has been specified as a multidimensional cognitive ability construct that relies on an integrative model derived from a literature review. This model integrates both theoretical and operational definitions of SI. In its current version, the model distinguishes between the following cognitive ability domains and has been in part supported by data in a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) study by Weis and Süd in 2007. So SI is about five qualities: Social understanding (SU) also social inference, social interpretation, or social judgment)represents the ability to understand social stimuli against the background of the given social situation. It also includes diversely labeled requirements such as the recognition of the mental states behind words, the comprehension of observed behaviors in the social context in which they occur, and the decoding of social cues. Social memory (SM) represents the ability to store and recall objectively given social information that can vary in complexity. The concept of SM was originally introduced by Moss and also appeared in works of Sternberg, Conway, Ketron, and Bernstein as memory for names and faces. Social perception (SP) represents the ability to perceive socially relevant information quickly in more or less complex situations. SP is distinguished from SU by only relying on objectively present information in order to exclude interpretative requirements. Social flexibility (SF) is the ability to produce as many and as diverse solutions or explanations as possible for a social situation or a social problem. The concept was originally introduced in Guilford‘s (1967) structure of human intellect model in the domain of divergent production of behavioural contents. Social knowledge (SK) includes knowledge of social matters, the individuals‘ fund of knowledge about the social world, or knowledge of the rules of etiquette. Unlike the remaining dimensions, SK highly depends on the social values of the environment and is not considered as a pure cognitive dimension. 1.2 Social Brain Goleman reveals that human beings have specific structures in their brains built to optimize relationships: · A spindle cell:- is the fastest acting neuron in our brain that guides our social decisions. Human brains contain more of these spindle cells than any other species. · Mirror neurons:- help us predict the behaviour of people around us by sub-consciously mimicking their movements. This helps us feel as they feel, move as they move, etc. · When a man gets a look from a woman he finds attractive, his brain secretes dopamine–a chemical that makes us feel pleasure. 1.3 Key elements of social intelligence: · Verbal fluency · Conversational skills · Knowledge of social roles and rules, as well as scripts · Effective listening skills · Understanding of how to cope well with others · Role playing · Social self-efficacy · Management skills · Intercultural and multicultural skills There‘s a lot going on behind one‘s words. While one speaks, the brain takes in micro- expressions, voice intonations, gestures and pheromones. 1.3.1 Micro-expressions: - are brief, involuntary facial expressions shown on the face of humans according to emotions experienced: · Usually occur in high-stakes situations, where people have something to lose or gain. · Occur when a person is consciously trying to conceal all signs of how they are feeling, or · When a person does not consciously know how they are feeling. · Unlike regular facial expressions, it is difficult/impossible to hide micro expression reactions. Micro-expressions cannot be controlled as they happen in a fraction of a second, but it is possible to capture someone's expressions with a high speed camera and replay them at much slower speeds. Micro-expressions express the seven universal emotions: disgust, anger, fear, sadness, happiness, contempt, and surprise. 1.3.2Voice intonations: · is the variation of pitch when one speaks (variation of levels we speak with is crucial in how we express ourselves) · one of the elements of linguistic prosody · the most important element of accent · helps to craft music of the language · it also helps the listener to follow the nature of communication Gestures and pheromones: - Pheromones give you the edge with attraction. People perceive all sorts of interesting things about one another through olfaction. It feels pretty normal – when we want something we take it, right? I‘m feeling thirsty; I‘ll grab a drink. I‘m hungry; I‘ll pick-up a snack. But you know what? This isn‘t what you should do when you desire a partner. The foundation of pick-up or game is ACQUISITION—the NEED to ACQUIRE a girl or man. This is the absolute, unquestioned and accepted law of game. The whole pick-up framework is built upon this. Simply, they are stimuli that elicit a reaction. Accordingly, people who have high SI have a greater awareness of their proto- conversations. 1.3.3 The Proto-conversation Goleman identifies two aspects of proto-conversations: Social Awareness: Your response to others (the manner in which you do so is crucial) Primal Empathy: Sensing other other‘s feelings and putting yourself in theirshoes Attunement: Listening with full receptivity Empathic Accuracy: Understanding others‘ thoughts and intentions Social Cognition: Understanding the social world and the working of a webof relationships Social Facility: Knowing how to have smooth, effective interactions Synchrony: Interacting smoothly Self-presentation: Knowing how you come across Influence: Shaping the outcome of social interactions Concern: Caring about others‘ needs 1.3.4 Your Social Triggers Social awareness is the capability to reckon that people and places trigger different emotions and this affects our ability to connect. Think about a time you felt excited and energized by an interaction. Now think of a time when you felt drained and defeated after an interaction. Along this, Goleman presents a theory on how our brain processes social interactions: The Low Road is our instinctual, emotion-based way we process interactions. It‘s how we read body-language, facial expressions and then formulate gut feelings about people. The High Road is our logical, critical thinking part of an interaction. We use the high road to communicate, tell stories and make connections. Why are these important? The Low Road guides our gut feelings and instincts. For example, if people didn‘t come to your birthday parties as a kid, you might feel a pang of anxiety when thinking about your own birthday as an adult–even if you have plenty of friends who would attend. Your High Road tells you that you are a grown up and things have changed, but your Low Road still gives you social anxiety. I call these social triggers. You should be aware of your unconscious social triggers to help you make relationship decisions. Knowing your Low Road social triggers helps your High Road function. Here‘s how you can identify yours: What kinds of social interactions do you dread? Who do you feel anxious hanging out with? When do you feel you can‘t be yourself? 1.3.5 Your Secure Base Whether you are a cheerful extrovert or a quiet introvert, everyone needs space and a place to recharge. Goleman suggests that‘s a ―secure base.‖ This is a ritual place or an activity that helps one process emotions and occurrences. A secure base is helpful for two main reasons. 1. It gives one a place to recharge before interactions so they don‘t get burnt out. 2. It helps one process and learn from each social encounter. 3. You can improve your Social Intelligence, you just need to prioritize it. Broken Bonds One of the biggest pitfalls in social intelligence is a lack of empathy. Goleman calls these Broken person treats Bonds. Philosopher Martin Buber coined the idea of the ―I-It‖ connection which happens when one another like an object as opposed to a human being. Imagine you have just lost a family member. You get a phone call from a friend offering condolences. Immediately you sense the obligation of the caller. They are distracted, you can hear the typing of keys in the background. Their wishes are cold, memorized and insincere. The call Case study: Cynthia receives an email from her friend, Joyce, every 60 days to grab lunch. Joyce‘s emails are always similar. When Cynthia realized the similarity in the emails, she started to think of herself as Joyce‘s ―calendar alert‖ that Joyce had set-up. Cynthia went low thinking as merely an item on Joyce‘s to do list. Cynthia analyzed that Joyce felt she ‗should‘ do lunch to keep in touch. But this led to their lunches to be perfunctory, predictable and boring to Cynthia. So, Cynthia stopped saying yes to grabbing lunch with her friend. · Don‘t interact because you feel that you ‗should.‘ · Say no to obligations if you can. · Interact with empathy or don‘t interact at all. 2. Positively Infectious When someone smiles at you, it‘s hard not to smile back. The same goes for other facial expressions. When your friend is sad and begins to tear up, your own eyes will often get moist. Why? These are your mirror neurons in action–part of your Low Road response to people. ―Hang out with people whose moods you want to catch. ―If moods are catching, gravitate towards people who will infect you with the good ones‖ 3. Adopt to Adapt Empathy works in such a way that one‘s Low Road automatically mirrors the people around them. Our brain copies the people around us, so we feel as they feel. This in turn helps us understand them, where they are coming from and even be better at predicting their reactions. ―Many paths of the low road run through mirror neurons. The neurons activate in a person based on something that is experienced by another person in the same way is experienced by the person himself. Whether pain (or pleasure) is anticipated or seen in another, the same neuron is activated.‖ makes you feel worse, not better.-Goleman, 41 4. Beware the Dark Triad Goleman shares the dark triad of people: · The narcissistic personality is when someone has an inflated view of themselves, a huge ego and a sense of entitlement. · The Machiavellian personality is when someone is manipulative and consistently exploits the people around them. · The psychopath personality is someone who is impulsive, remorselessness and extremely selfish. Goleman summarizes the dark triad motto as: Others exist to adore me. 5. Mindblind Mindblind is the inability to sense what is happening in the mind of someone else. The key to mindsight is compassion. ―In short, self-absorption in all its forms kills empathy, let alone compassion. When we focus on ourselves, our world contracts as our problems and preoccupations loom large. But when we focus on others, our world expands. Our own problems drift to the periphery of the mind and so seem smaller, and we increase our capacity for connection – or compassionate action.‖ – Goleman, 54 Goleman claims that people are wired for altruism. People are inherently good. However, sometimes they forget how good it makes them feel to be good. Dr. Baron-Cohen devised something called the Empathy Quotient. This is a quiz to test your empathy levels. While he devised the test for adults on the Aspergers or Autism Spectrum, but this quiz has been found to be very helpful. 6. A People Prescription ―The most striking finding on relationships and physical health is that socially integrated people, those who are married, have close family and friends, belong to social and religious groups, and participate widely in these networks, recover more quickly from disease and live longer. Roughly eighteen studies show a strong connection between social connectivity and mortality.‖ – Goleman, 247. 1.3.6 Synthesis of ways to develop your social intelligence: How to develop social intelligence? According to Goleman ―friends make you healthy;‖ healthy happy life is positive relationships. Your partner, friends, colleagues and children, support your soul as well as our immune system. This has been realized through studies that have found that kinds words, physical touch, a song from childhood improve the vital signs of the sick and even fatally ill. Therefore, investing in your relationships is worth the effort. Simply put, following are ways in which you can develop your social intelligence: · Willingness and dedication to learn · Paying more attention to social happenings around you · Develop yourself to be a better speaker · Networking · Try to listen more to others (active listening) · Inquisitiveness to know more about social situations · Learn more about your own behaviour · Acquire knowledge on social successes and failures 1.3.7 Let’s look at the kinds of smart for you to be to figure that out and answer: Gardner, a developmental psychologist and Harvard professor name, developed in the 80s and 90s. In his book Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, Gardner developed the approach that intelligence is spectrum composed of different kinds of minds and therefore people learn, remember, and understand in different ways. He initially listed 7 types of intelligences, and later added the 8th (naturalist). This is what it looks like: 1. Visual-Spatial Intelligence People who are strong in visual-spatial intelligence are good at visualizing things. These individuals are often good with directions as well as maps, charts, videos, and pictures. Strengths Visual and spatial judgment Characteristics People with visual-spatial intelligence: · Read and write for enjoyment · Are good at putting puzzles together · Interpret pictures, graphs, and charts well · Enjoy drawing, painting, and the visual arts · Recognize patterns easily Potential Career Choices If you're strong in visual-spatial intelligence, good career choices for you are: · Architect · Artist · Engineer 2. Linguistic-Verbal Intelligence People who are strong in linguistic-verbal intelligence are able to use words well, both when writing and speaking. These individuals are typically very good at writing stories, memorizing information, and reading.1 Strengths Words, language, and writing Characteristics People with linguistic-verbal intelligence: · Remember written and spoken information · Enjoy reading and writing · Debate or give persuasive speeches · Are able to explain things well · Use humour when telling stories Potential Career Choices If you're strong in linguistic-verbal intelligence, good career choices for you are: · Writer/journalist · Lawyer · Teacher 3. Logical-Mathematical Intelligence People who are strong in logical-mathematical intelligence are good at reasoning, recognizing patterns, and logically analyzing problems. These individuals tend to think conceptually about numbers, relationships, and patterns.4 Strengths Analyzing problems and mathematical operations Characteristics People with logical-mathematical intelligence: · Have excellent problem-solving skills · Enjoy thinking about abstract ideas · Like conducting scientific experiments · Can solve complex computations Potential Career Choices If you're strong in logical-mathematical intelligence, good career choices for you are: · Scientist · Mathematician · Computer programmer · Engineer · Accountant 4. Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence Those who have high bodily-kinesthetic intelligence are said to be good at body movement, performing actions, and physical control. People who are strong in this area tend to have excellent hand-eye coordination and dexterity. Strengths Physical movement, motor control Characteristics People with bodily-kinesthetic intelligence: · Are skilled at dancing and sports · Enjoy creating things with his or her hands · Have excellent physical coordination · Remember by doing, rather than hearing or seeing Potential Career Choices If you're strong in bodily-kinesthetic intelligence, good career choices for you are: · Dancer · Builder · Sculptor · Actor 5. Musical Intelligence People who have strong musical intelligence are good at thinking in patterns, rhythms, and sounds. They have a strong appreciation for music and are often good at musical composition and performance. Strengths Rhythm and music Characteristics People with musical intelligence: · Enjoy singing and playing musical instruments · Recognize musical patterns and tones easily · Remember songs and melodies · Have a rich understanding of musical structure, rhythm, and notes Potential Career Choices If you're strong in musical intelligence, good career choices for you are: · Musician · Composer · Singer · Music teacher · Conductor 6. Interpersonal Intelligence Those who have strong interpersonal intelligence are good at understanding and interacting with other people. These individuals are skilled at assessing the emotions, motivations, desires, and intentions of those around them. Strengths Understanding and relating to other people Characteristics People with interpersonal intelligence: · Communicate well verbally · Are skilled at nonverbal communication · See situations from different perspectives · Create positive relationships with others · Resolve conflicts in group settings Potential Career Choices If you're strong in interpersonal intelligence, good career choices for you are: · Psychologist · Philosopher · Counselor · Salesperson · Politician 7. Intrapersonal Intelligence Individuals who are strong in intrapersonal intelligence are good at being aware of their own emotional states, feelings, and motivations. They tend to enjoy self-reflection and analysis, including daydreaming, exploring relationships with others, and assessing their personal strengths. Strengths Introspection and self-reflection Characteristics People with intrapersonal intelligence: · Analyze their strengths and weaknesses well · Enjoy analyzing theories and ideas · Have excellent self-awareness · Understand the basis for his or her own motivations and feelings Potential Career Choices If you're strong in intrapersonal intelligence, good career choices for you are: · Philosopher · Writer · Theorist · Scientist 8. Naturalistic Intelligence Naturalistic is the most recent addition to Gardner‘s theory and has been met with more resistance than his original seven intelligences. According to Gardner, individuals who are high in this type of intelligence are more in tune with nature and are often interested in nurturing, exploring the environment, and learning about other species. These individuals are said to be highly aware of even subtle changes to their environments. Strengths Finding patterns and relationships to nature Characteristics People with naturalistic intelligence: · Are interested in subjects such as botany, biology, and zoology · Categorize and catalog information easily · Enjoy camping, gardening, hiking, and exploring the outdoors · Dislikes learning unfamiliar topics that have no connection to nature Potential Career Choices If you're strong in naturalistic intelligence, good career choices for you are: · Biologist · Conservationist · Gardener · Farmer Some questions to address on your own are: What are you smart on? What evidence do you have that made you reach that decision? What do others say aboutyour smart/s? Topic 2: Social Intelligence in relation to Engineering Introduction Internationally it has been witnessed that engineering students need more skills than engineering education. Competitive graduates require relevant skills that has honed them to be dynamic and function effectively in the workplace and society. Lack of Social Intelligence skills, also known as Social Intelligence quotient (SI) skills in students affect their performance and has been regarded to be leading to higher drop-out rates and poor quality of the engineering. Recent literature emphasizes a need for engineering to integrate necessary non-engineering skills such as SI and emotional intelligence (EI) skills. These two are closely related and tend to be confused. However, there’s a thin line between them. Research, professional bodies and experts have identified that the graduate engineer requires many skills and a great deal of knowledge when entering the workforce. Crucial elements such as interpersonal skills, as well as teamwork and a strong sense of motivation are regarded to be particularly relevant in this era of globalization, occurring in a dynamic speed and dictates environment in which the modern engineer must interact. Real Engineering and RealLife The heavy traditionalism of many courses have the perspective of teaching only real engineering especially, defining and isolating problems and achieving technical solutions. Exposure to this culture of traditionalist engineering education not only discourages reflection, but also generates future engineers who both lack and do not appreciate the value of the skills of reflection. Along with that, do engineering studies actively discourage the ESI factor by the very nature of the traditionalist style of teaching in this field? Such traditionalist teaching imparts engineering as a discipline rather than as a career. The Evolution of EngineeringEducation Overtime, engineering has progressively become less and less of a stand-alone subject. Other disciplines have influenced and became increasingly integrated in engineering curricula in order to increase the sharpness of a university‘s graduates, thereby responding to industry demands, e.g. management, business strategy, marketing, philosophy, communication, ethics, environmentalism, sustainability, etc. Engineers‘ attitudes to the soft skills area, incorporating people, ideas and self- reflection, have to be tackled at a fundamental level. Universities along employers have identified necessary skills that need to be integrated into the curricula. These are complemented with abilities that are valued by both universities and particularly employers, and they include some of the following: · Self- and context-awareness. · Decision-making and action planning. · Research and analysis. · Communication skills. · Critical reflection. · Problem solving · Creativity Cognisant of the fact that, the above-mentioned soft skills are part of engineering profession (engineering skills necessary in the fields of engineering) these characteristics can be effectively incorporated as parts of the elements of SI/ESI. These are subjects in humanities that have been regarded to play an active role in the education of future engineers who can reflect and display sensitivity to both individuals and society. Create the Future Socially intelligent engineers have the opportunity to manifest future changes and actively create the future. Indeed, Cooper and Sawaf state that: ... successfully intelligent leaders and managers continually question many of the assumptions that others accept ... [and] they challenge it perceiving the deeper risks and limitations, and in many cases find ways to transcend it ... They know the future is not something we wait for; it is something we must actively help create. And emotional intelligence plays a vital role. Social intelligence Unit 1
note Note
studied byStudied by 1 person
4 days ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
5 days ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
6 days ago
0.0(0)
note Note
studied byStudied by 0 people
6 days ago
0.0(0)