Law of Contract

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/43

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering key terms, principles and landmark cases related to offer, acceptance, and invitation to treat under Malaysian Contract Law and common law precedents.

Law

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

44 Terms

1
New cards

Contract

An agreement enforceable by law (s.2(h) Contracts Act 1950) creating a legally binding obligation between parties.

2
New cards

Contracts Act 1950 (Malaysia)

Principal Malaysian statute governing formation, validity and enforcement of contracts.

3
New cards

Agreement

A promise or set of promises forming consideration for each other; becomes legally enforceable when all contract elements exist.

4
New cards

Offer (Proposal)

Expression of willingness to do or abstain from doing something with a view to obtaining the other party’s assent (s.2(a) CA 1950).

5
New cards

Offeror / Promisor

Party who makes the offer or proposal.

6
New cards

Offeree / Promisee

Party to whom the offer is made and who may accept it.

7
New cards

Acceptance

Unqualified assent to all terms of an offer; upon acceptance the proposal becomes a promise (s.2(b) CA 1950).

8
New cards

Consensus ad idem

‘Meeting of the minds’; parties must be of one mind on the same thing for a contract to exist.

9
New cards

Intention to Create Legal Relations

Element requiring parties to intend their agreement to be legally binding.

10
New cards

Consideration

Something of value exchanged between parties; necessary for most enforceable contracts.

11
New cards

Legal Capacity

Parties’ ability in law to enter a binding contract (e.g., age, sound mind).

12
New cards

Certainty

Contract terms must be clear and definite; vague promises are unenforceable.

13
New cards

Legality

Object and consideration of the contract must not be illegal or contrary to public policy.

14
New cards

Free Consent

Agreement must be free from coercion, fraud, misrepresentation, undue influence or mistake.

15
New cards

Invitation to Treat (ITT)

Preliminary communication inviting negotiations; cannot itself be accepted to form a contract.

16
New cards

Supply of Information

Statement of price or facts (e.g., Harvey v Facey) that is not an offer but mere information.

17
New cards

Display of Goods

Placing items in shop window or shelf is ITT; customer’s act of presenting goods is the offer (Fisher v Bell; Boots case).

18
New cards

Fisher v Bell (1961)

Case holding shop display of a flick-knife was an ITT, not an offer to sell a prohibited weapon.

19
New cards

Pharmaceutical Society v Boots (1953)

Established that self-service store displays are ITT; contract forms at cashier under pharmacist supervision.

20
New cards

Advertisement (general rule)

Usually an ITT inviting offers from the public (Partridge v Crittenden).

21
New cards

Partridge v Crittenden (1968)

Advertisement for sale of wild birds was an ITT; seller not guilty of ‘offering’ prohibited birds.

22
New cards

Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1893)

Advertisement with performance conditions and deposit of £1,000 constituted a unilateral offer to the world; performance = acceptance.

23
New cards

Tenders

Invitation to submit bids is ITT; each tender submitted is the offer, which may be accepted or rejected.

24
New cards

Auctions

Auctioneer’s call for bids is ITT; each bid is an offer; acceptance occurs at fall of hammer (Payne v Cave).

25
New cards

Reserve Price (Auctions)

Minimum price; auctioneer cannot accept bids below reserve.

26
New cards

Revocation of Offer

Withdrawal of offer any time before acceptance is communicated to offeror (s.5(1) CA 1950).

27
New cards

Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880)

Revocation effective only when communicated to offeree; posting a revocation letter insufficient until received.

28
New cards

Dickinson v Dodds (1876)

Offer may be revoked through reliable third-party notice; promise to keep offer open unenforceable without consideration.

29
New cards

Lapse of Time

Offer terminates when stated acceptance period expires or after reasonable time if none stated (s.6(b) CA).

30
New cards

Condition Precedent

Offer lapses if acceptor fails to meet a required condition before acceptance (s.6(c) CA).

31
New cards

Death or Mental Disorder of Offeror

Offer terminates if offeree learns of offeror’s death or insanity before acceptance (s.6(d) CA).

32
New cards

Rejection

Offeree expressly declines offer; original offer cannot later be accepted unless renewed.

33
New cards

Counter-Offer

Offeree’s variation of terms; rejects original offer and proposes new one (Hyde v Wrench).

34
New cards

Hyde v Wrench (1840)

Counter-offer of £950 destroyed original £1,000 offer; no contract when original terms later ‘accepted’.

35
New cards

Postal Rule

Acceptance complete when letter is posted (against proposer) and when received (against acceptor) (s.4 CA).

36
New cards

Ignatius v Bell (1913)

Option accepted by posting letter within time limit; contract formed at posting under postal rule.

37
New cards

Felthouse v Bindley (1862)

Silence cannot constitute acceptance; no contract where nephew failed to communicate assent to buy horse.

38
New cards

Entores v Miles Far East (1955)

For instantaneous communications (telex), contract formed where acceptance is received by offeror.

39
New cards

Revocation of Acceptance

Accepting party may revoke acceptance before it reaches offeror (s.5(2) CA 1950).

40
New cards

Modes of Contract Formation

Contracts may be made orally, in writing, or by conduct; no particular form generally required.

41
New cards

Express Offer

Offer made in words, spoken or written (s.9 CA).

42
New cards

Implied Offer

Offer inferred from conduct, not expressed in words (s.9 CA).

43
New cards

Meeting Requirements of Offer

Offer must be legal, communicated, certain, and made with intention to obtain assent.

44
New cards

Consensus ad idem Case (Ayer Hitam Tin Dredging v YC Chin)

Malaysian case emphasising necessity of parties’ matching intentions for contract formation.