1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
simple random sample
list of all members of the population and number off 2 to N
use the hat or RNG method
Survey the people with the corresponding numbers
hat method
N identical slips of paper, labeled 1 to N. put in the hat and mix them up. draw slips of paper without replacement
RNG method
use RNG to generate unique numbers from range 1 to N
stratified random sample
group individuals by some similar characteristics that’s relevant
take a SRS from each stratum
cluster random sample
group the individuals by location
number off the clusters and take a SRS of the clusters
survey ALL the people in the randomly selected cluster
pros: fast, easy cheap
cons: not representative
Bias
consistent UNDER or OVER estimate of value
Must state direction
ex. pushups → volunteers were more likely to be fit → OVER estimate
Bad sampling methods
voluntary and convenience
undercoverage
subset of population can’t be selected bc they weren’t on the sampling frame of all people in the population
response bias
get an answer but it’s not truthful
nonresponse
1) people don’t respond
2) can’t be reached
Principles of experimental design
1) random assignment
2) control
3) comparison
4) replication - need to have enough experimental units to say it was the treatment that caused the change and not just chance variation from the random assignment
Randomized block design
Stratified but for experiments
1) experimental units are put into groups (blocks) that share some similar characteristics
2) performs the experiment on all blocks then combine results
reduces variability, easier to determine if treatment really caused a change
Who can you generalize the results of your study to?
Only people SIMILAR to the volunteers in the experiment