1/62
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
language
-an exchange of information
-used to convey information so must be stored in some sort of semantic form in the brain → to talk about ideas must understand and comprehend them
conceptualising language
-must be a set of words that are broadly accepted as part of that language
-words on their own have meaning and combining words develops the meaning
-to do this must have an understanding of grammar
-this facilitates human interaction
defining language
-definitions of language often reflect differences between human language and non-human animal communication systems
-language can be described as an arbitrary set of symbols and rules for combining symbols, which can be used to create an infinite variety of messages
Hockett - defining features of language
-initially 13 but 16 in total
-believed these differentiated human language from non-human language systems
-all human spoken language include all 16 features
vocal-auditory channel (Hockett)
-all human languages are usually transmitted through vocal-auditory channel
-evolutionary advantage → allows us to keep our hands free and speech carry distances
broadcast transmission and directional reception (Hockett)
-when speaking, sounds are produced in all directions, but the perceiver can localise the source of the speech
-attribute the sound to a being
rapid fading (Hockett)
-transitoriness
-speech disappears when talking stops
-the sounds cease to exist and so the language attributed to the sounds cease to exist
interchangeability (Hockett)
-competent users of the language can repeat any message they hear
-can understand their own messages
total feedback (Hockett)
-the speaker hears everything that they say
specialisation (Hockett)
-the sounds we produce are designed to convey meaning
-specialised and products of biological processes
semanticity (Hockett)
-the ties between the word and it’s meaning are definite
-sounds denote specific messages
-homophones are exceptions to this rule
arbitrariness (Hockett)
-words are arbitrary and decided by agreement
-the words themselves are not representative → we just agree this is what it means
discreteness (Hockett)
-linguistic representations can be broken down into small, discrete units, which combine with each other in rule-governed ways
displacement (Hockett)
-can talk about things that aren’t immediately in our vicinity
-argued to be uniquely human → understanding of what is around us and what is not
-links to memory
productivity (Hockett)
-language is not stagnant, it changes
-we develop new and novel words with new meanings
traditional transmission (Hockett)
-language is acquired through social groups, teaching through social interaction
-ongoing process
duality of patterning (Hockett)
-speech can be analysed on two levels:
made up of meaningless element → a limited inventory of sounds or phenomes
made up of meaningful elements → virtually limitless inventory of words or morphemes
human communication systems
-body language
-verbal language:
spoken
written
sign
-enables us to communicate thoughts and concepts to other people
human language
-requires a person to:
link words to meanings
understand rules that subtly alter the meaning of a phrase
be aware that specific combinations of sounds carry meaning
use language to convey via the way we choose to speak
Sapir-Whorf theory (language on cognition)
-language frames our thinking
-allows us to understand difficult concepts, logical problems and philosophical debates
-language shapes the way we think
Winawer (language and cognition)
-colour perception affected by language
-Russian and English speakers have differing perception of colour
language and cognition
-word order affects ability to remember items on a list
-speakers of a language with front-load sentences with salient information demonstrates primacy effect
language based on mental representations
-assume the world is represented by mental representations which are developed via experience with sensory input
-the store of mental representations for language are developed via experience with language
-we match mental representations to words we see or hear
-we activate our mental representations of words to speak or write
language functions
-Lichtehim
speaking + writing → production
reading + understanding → comprehension
Sarah Scott (language and speech)
-suffered a stroke at 17
-can comprehend language but not produce it
-after years of therapy her speech returned to normal
-shows that language production and comprehension are distinct processes
building blocks of language
-semantics
-syntax
-morphology
-phonology (form)
-speech
semantic memory structure (building blocks of language)
-Collins & Loftus - associative network model
-organise things in memory through an associative network model
all the meanings link to different elements
-links relevant and related concepts together
semantics (building blocks of language)
-semantics → meaning/concept
-to express something, must have understanding of what it is
-cannot speak about things we do not have a representation for
syntax (building blocks of language)
-grammar
-rules we apply to language which applies meaning to the way we speak and put things together
-rules help us to make sense of order of words to convey meaning
-different rules in different languages
phrase structure (syntax)
-sentence = noun phrase + verb phrase
-shifting syntax of a sentence can completely change the meaning
-limited number of rules means that there is an infinite number of unique statements
morphology (building blocks of language)
-study of words
-investigate the structure of words in terms of morphemes
morpheme (building blocks of language)
-smallest meaningful unit of sound that conveys meaning and grammatical properties
free morpheme (building blocks of language)
-can be on its own
bound morphemes (building blocks of language)
-don’t work on their own
-suffix, prefix, infix
-have to be added to something else to have meaning and make sense
form (building blocks of language)
-phonology → sound system
phonemes (form)
-a unit of sound
-do not necessarily correspond to a single letter in our alphabet
-phonemes in combination make up all the words we have learned and will know
orthography (form)
-writing systems
grapheme (form)
-visual representation of a phenome
-symbols in a writing system → letters
-children have to learn grapheme-phenome correspondence in order to learn how to write
graphemes and phenomes
-1 grapheme can represent more than 1 phenome e.g., ‘i’ in pint
-1 phenome can be represented by more than 1 grapheme e.g., ‘k’ can be represented by ‘c’ or ‘ck’
syntax (building blocks of language)
-representations and rules that specifies the ordering of words
-the abstract representation that specifies how words in a sentence are related by grammatical properties
basic phrase structure rules (syntax)
a sentence is made up of a noun phrase and a verb phrase
a noun phrase is made up of a noun that may be modified by an article, adjective and a prepositional phrase
a prepositional phrase is made up of a preposition followed by a noun phrase
pragmatics (building blocks of language)
-the meaning within the language
-language within context
-nuances in the way we speak to each other → underlying and more subtle way of understanding that impacts our speech
-e.g., idioms and metaphors
use of pragmatics (building blocks of language)
-the study of the choices we make when selecting language
-why we chose these options
-the effects of those choices
-context, emphasis, vocabulary, tone
-every aspect of language has a reason for its use
pragmatics - Grice’s Maxims
quantity
quality
relation
manner
semantics (building blocks of language)
-distinction between linguistic elements and the mental concepts with which they are related
mental lexicon (comprehending speech)
-our store of all the words and meanings that we possibly know
-when a word is said to someone:
activates the relevant sounds in our brain
this activates relevant phonology
then activates the relevant semantics
this is used to access the relevant syntax
-this order is reversed when producing speech
spreading activation in the mental lexicon - competition
-in response to activation of a concept:
related words are activated in the mental lexicon
activated words compete for selection
-more competition between similar words means we are more likely to make a mistake when trying to select a word
how do we communicate
-speak at 2-3 words per second
-150-200 words per minute
-peppered with pauses and hesitations
methods to test speech production
-timing of speech onset, hesitations & pauses
-speech errors
-tip-of-the-tongue state
timing of speech onset, hesitations & pauses (methods to test speech production)
-a delay in initiating speech may be the result of processing problems
-Schacter found more fillers in speech for humanities compared to natural science lectures → more synonyms in the language used leads to more competition
timing of speech (methods to test speech production)
-hesitations provide insight into mental processes
-larger numbers of words in the lexicon result in more hesitations
-concepts compete for articulation
speech errors (methods to test speech production)
-you know what you want to say but retrieve the wrong word to say it
-Vigliocco & Hartsuiker estimate an error occurs every 500 sentences
slip of the tongue (speech errors)
-types of errors:
words
morphemes
phonemes
concept
-exchanges usually come from the same category
-make all these types of errors but they do not overlap and are distinct errors
speech errors - levels of processing
semantics → conceptualisation, semantic blend errors
syntax & morphemes → formulation, syntactic and morpheme exchange
articulation → word and phoneme exchange
sound and word errors (speech errors)
-most word errors involve words from the same syntactic category and involve words further apart
-in sound errors most vowels interact with other vowels and consonant with other consonants
-involve sounds close together
-suggests that lexical and phonological processing may occur separately
what speech errors tell us about speech production
-switches can occur at the end of a phrase
-syntactic/morphological elements are left in place
-tells us that phrases are planned and then articulated
-exchange or blend errors result in ‘legal’ non-words
so phoneme combinations are restricted by the rules of language e.g., spork not fpoon
tip-of-the-tongue state (methods to test speech production)
-a state where you know what you want to say but have trouble retrieving the word to say it
-have access to semantic and syntactic representations of a word but not the phonological form
Vigliocco (tip-of-the-tongue state)
-Italian speakers in tip-of-the-tongue states know the grammatical gender of the word but cannot access the phonological form of the word
-shows that syntax and form are processed separately
-influence one another but are functionally separate
competition (tip-of-the-tongue state)
interference → from conflicting information results in hesitation or tip-of-the-tongue state
activation and competition → between related items ‘blocks’ retrieval of the target word
Smith & Tindell - priming method (methods to test speech production)
-were given a prime word
-then given fragment of a target word and had to guess what is was
e.g., analogy → an_to_y → anatomy
-two conditions:
related prime word
unrelated prime word
Smith & Tindell - priming results (methods to test speech production)
-found participants got more correct for unrelated prime words
-activation of related information interferes with access of target information
-activation of unrelated information does not interfere with access of target information
language production is a series of processes
-competitive processes underpin selection of concepts
hesitations in speech, blend errors, tip-of-the-tongue state
-production requires concepts to be activated, morphological elements to be added and words to be articulated
speech errors respect syntactic, word and phonological categories, tip-of-the-tongue state
models of speech production
-evidence from speech errors resulted in the development of computational models of speech production that conceptualise production as a series of processes with rules
spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production (Dell)
theory of lexical access in speech production (Levelt)