1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Multi-Agency Approach – Advantage: Improved Information Sharing
Invokes cooperation between police, social services, schools, and others to share risk information early, especially with youth or vulnerable individuals.
Multi-Agency Approach – Advantage: Holistic Support for Offenders
Addresses underlying causes like trauma, addiction, or poverty rather than just punishing the crime.
Multi-Agency Approach – Advantage: Focus on Prevention
Enables early intervention to stop offending before it starts, especially in youth or at-risk individuals.
Multi-Agency Approach – Advantage: Successful Policy Example
The Crime and Disorder Act 1998 led to Youth Offending Teams, which helped reduce youth reoffending.
Multi-Agency Approach – Disadvantage: Coordination Challenges
Different agencies may have conflicting goals, leading to poor communication or delayed action.
Multi-Agency Approach – Disadvantage: Confidentiality Barriers
Data protection laws may stop agencies from sharing crucial information.
Multi-Agency Approach – Disadvantage: Accountability Issues
No clear responsibility when something goes wrong; agencies may blame each other.
Multi-Agency Approach – Disadvantage: Expensive and Resource Heavy
Requires long-term funding, staff time, and training—often lacking during budget cuts.
Multi-Agency Approach – Overall Effectiveness
Effective with proper resources and coordination, but vulnerable to funding and communication issues.
Democratic Policing – Advantage: Builds Trust Through Community Engagement
PCSOs and neighbourhood policing increase visibility and improve relationships with local people.
Democratic Policing – Advantage: Reflects Public Priorities
Allows policing to focus on local concerns like hate crime or domestic violence.
Democratic Policing – Advantage: Reduces Focus on Minor Offences
Low-priority status for offences like cannabis possession frees up resources for more serious issues.
Democratic Policing – Advantage: Based on Left Realist Ideas
Encourages ‘policing by consent’ and tackling concerns of working-class communities and victims.
Democratic Policing – Disadvantage: Risk of Politicisation
Policing decisions may follow political or media agendas instead of crime data or justice needs.
Democratic Policing – Disadvantage: Inconsistent Enforcement
Priorities may vary by area, leading to unequal treatment and inconsistent responses to crime.
Democratic Policing – Disadvantage: May Underplay Serious Threats
Too much focus on visible or popular issues may leave serious or hidden crimes under-policed.
Democratic Policing – Overall Effectiveness
Improves public trust and aligns with community needs, but success depends on consistent strategy and public cooperation.