1/34
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Deviance
a person, behaviour, or characteristic that is straying from an accepted norm and subjected to measures of social control
Norms
established standards of behaviour maintained by a society
Formal norms
laws; regulation
Informal norms: Mores
Morality; what is right/ wrong?
ie) bullying children
Informal norms: Folkways
Politeness; what’s considered rude?
ie) talking to loud on the bus
Social control
attempts by others to regulate people’s thoughts/ behaviours
informal: raised eyebrow
formal: censorship, criminal charges
Social typing
process that includes 3 steps
description (names)
evaluation (adjectives)
prescription (how do we deal/ react)
Objective definition
a behaviour/ trait itself that makes it deviant
is a quality that goes against established norms
Subjective definition
society’s reaction/ label (especially by those in power) that makes it deviant
not specific trait; someone decides to label it as unacceptable then control it
Objectivist Positions
Don’t always agree on how something is deviant
How uncommon/ rare?
Harm
Breaks social norms
Causes negative reaction from others
Physical harm (objectivists)
can be done to someone or yourself
ie) assault, 2nd- hand smoke, cutting
Emotional harm (objectivists)
can be done to someone or yourself
ie) cyberbullying, negative self-talk
Social harm (objectivists)
interfere with society
ie) criminal activity = safety and social order
ie) obesity = economic costs
Ontological harm (objectivists)
threat to a person’s sense of identity and place in the world
ie) religion = cause conflict b/w people with secular pov
Limitations of statistical rarity
hard to quantify
some rare things ≠ deviant or require social control
ie) prodigies = rare → are respected
Limitations of harm
not the most clear
harmful things = are not necessarily deviant
ie) early feminists ≠ harming society, but changing it
ie) history = masturbation bad, not really
Limitations of societal reaction (masses response)
hard to quantify → what percentage??
“whose” reaction will likely have a response
ie) mine vs prime minister
Limitations of normative violation (violates social norms)
different groups = have different norms (no consensus)
ie) language around friends vs with grandparents
laws ≠ represents everyone belief/ views
situation/ context matters
ie) murder = bad, circumstance of self-defence = okay, or no?
Law: consensus view
law reflects what society agrees is wrong
Law: conflict view
law reflects interests groups with power
Law: interactionist view
powerful interest groups influence which problems become laws
strict construction
reality depends on how people perceive it
only deviant because people define it as such, not that it is inherently
contextual construction
reality exists, but depends on the culture and timeline → cause different views
ie) smoking = different views by different groups → cool, unhealthy, etc
Social construction: individual level
own beliefs and identity = affect what you consider deviant
Social construction: interaction level
people around you (family, friends, etc) = = influence what you consider deviant
Social construction: institution level
organizations (school, government, religion, etc) = influence what’s considered deviant
ie) gov = restrict smoking, school = teacher risks of smoking
Social construction: sociocultural level
society overall belief, norms, and values = decides what’s acceptable
Social construction: global level
worldwide influence
International tobacco control
The deviance dance
The ongoing interaction and debate between groups of whether something is deviant or not
Those with greater social “power” have a more dominant influence
Deviance Dance: country line
Groups agree what is deviant and how to control it
Deviance Dance: waltz
Groups agree what is deviant, but not how to control it
Deviance Dance: mosh pit
Groups don’t agree what is deviant and how to control it
preventative measures
stops deviance before it happens
retroactive measures
response after deviance happened
self- control measures
regulates own behaviour