1/55
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
ideal immiscible displacement conditions
ignore finite solubility of the different fluid phases in e/o
ignore compresibility of the displacing & displace fluid phase
fractional flow
the relative flow velocity of water with respect to the total flow velocity
mass flux, M
mass change in volume element & time interval
fluid phase velocity
the fractional flow functional value divided by the phase saturation because the true interstitial velocity depends on the volume occupied by the fluid phase, which scales with the phase saturation
steady state system
both fluid phase velocities are adjusted to the same fractional flow point
const Sw
front velocity
the velocity of the saturation change
fractional flow discriminations
consider a monotonic behavior of the saturation profile
apply the material balance a second time
assume shock front formation.
shock
a mathematical description of the motion of a surface of discontinuity
shock waves
the properties of a surface of discontinuity of a solution of a first-order quasi-linear hyperbolic system of partial differential equations.
what do we use shock waves
“shocks” are observed in numerical simulations
shocks are typical problems arising in the context of first-order quasi-linear hyperbolic partial differential equations e.g. MBE
wave classification
depending on their spreading character
Spreading waves: wave becomes more diffuse on propagation (non-sharpening)
Sharpening waves: wave is self sharpening and becomes less diffuse →the wave will become a shock, even if the initial condition is diffuse
Mixed waves: Like the Buckley-Leverett wave
Indifferent waves: neither spreading nor sharpening – might appear as shocks in the absence of dissipation
heat capacity
the heat that is required to change the temperature by ∆T
thermal diffusivity
measures the ability of a material to conduct thermal energy relative to its ability to store thermal energy
heat equation
a parabolic partial differential equation that describes the sedistribution of heat (or variation in temperature) in a given region over time.
sensible heat
a change of temp of a substance l
latent heat
heat absorbed or released by a substance during a (first order) phase transition (e.g. transition of steam to liquid water) without a temperature change.
enthalpy
measure of the total energy of a thermodynamic system
cold water recharge
a doublet system with a hot producer and a cold re-injector, cold water is injected into:
single phase liquid water region → pressure increase/ maintenance
two-phase (steam-water) res → decreasing pressure due condensation & declining temp
superheated steam zone → increase the pressure as long as no two-phase zone
forced convection = advection
fluid transported by external forces like applied pressure gradient
natural convection
convection is caused by intrinsic mechanisms like fluid density differences (maybe caused by a temperature gradient) in a gravity field
Rayleigh number, Ra
a dimensionless number describing the buoyancy driven flow
Ra<Ra,c → heat transfer primarily by conduction
Ra>Ra,c → heat transfer primarily by convection
effect of temp on crude oil
viscosity decreases w/ increasing temp → increasing mobility
mixing
a result of true physical effects & lack of info/ description
mixing types
Diffusive mixing
Microscopic dispersive mixing
Macroscopic dispersive mixing
mass balance formula
change in fluid mass in volume, V = net fluid inflow across surface of V + net gain fro sinks & sources in V
fracture = crack
any mechanical discontinuity in a rock incl. joints & faults
joint
fracture that exhibits only a small opening displacement, usually less that the grain-size of the host rock
fault
fracture with measurable displacement parallel to surface
vein
fracture with a measurable opening that is filled with mineral, or igenous rock (dyke, sill or sheet).
fracture characteristics
Orientations / sets
Spacing, spacing distribution and clustering
Length distribution
Density / intensity
Connectivity
Fragmentation and matrix block size
percolation categories
growth: disconnected → connected network
addition: sub-critical, percolation threshold & super critical
reservoir processes
unfrac. res: Predominantly forced processes → Tested by core floods
frac. res: Predominantly spontaneous processes → tested by AMOTT type of experiment
how do we describe fracture networks
explicitly or statistical depending on:
the typical length scale of the fracture or the fracture network
our knowledge about the fracture system
The available computational power.
McNaughton classification of fracture networks
type A: high storage capacity in the matrix & low storage capacity in fracture
type B: approx. equal storage capacity in the matrix & fracture
type C: all storage capacity in the fracture, tight matrix
nelson’s classification of fracture networks
type I: feature provides the storage capacity & perm. → geothermal application = hot dry rock
type II: matrix provides storage capacity & fracture provides the permeability → hydraulically stimulated res
type III: fracture provides permeability assists, good matrix porosity & perm
type IV: fracture creates anisotropy
fractured res characteristics
High apparent permeability
Early breakthrough of injected fluids or early gas/water coning
Highly directional flow behavior (and localized in the producing interval)
Large variability in well productivities and recoveries
Permeability depends on stress and fluid pressure
fractured res uncertainties
Productivity of wells and sustainability of rate
In the case of injection: time to injectant breakthrough (oil or enthalpy production decline)
Recovery mechanism controlling rate dependency
Contacted reservoir volume → sweep effects
info sources
Knowledge about the global geological setting
Seismic survey
Monitoring of seismic activities during well stimulation and well testing
Local information from wells:
Borehole imaging
Core analysis
Flow monitoring
flow tests
classical well test analysis
steady state flow tests from injection to production well
fracture flow modelling difficulties
the general lack of data
bridging and extracting data taken at different length scales
Integration of diverse data from different sources in a fracture network
How to translate and simplify the reservoir model for efficient modeling?
network properties
size and size distribution of the fractures
number density of fractures
orientation and connectivity
aperture and related permeability and porosity
reservoir fracture models
discrete fracture modelling
Deterministic discrete fracture models → Explicit representation of the fractures
Stochastic discrete fracture models:
Natural fractures
Position and orientation statistically distributes
Radii fractal distributed
Overlapping and activated apertures → permeability
continuum models
dual continua approach assumptions
Fracture permeability can be averaged
All fractures are interconnected
Each grid-block contains a statistically meaningful number of fractures
Grid-block fracture properties can be averaged
Matrix-block sizes are normally distributed so they can be averaged
Grid-blocks are isometric (equal dimensions)
MINC method = multi interactive continua
Primary grid discretizing the reservoir volume
Secondary grid formed by nested sub-cells representing the matrix
Is able to handle the transient flow of heat and fluids between matrix and fractures numerically (in contrast to transfer function of DC models)
for multiphase flows, or coupled fluid and heat flows, transient periods can be very long → it is necessary to resolve the driving pressure, temperature, and mass fraction gradients at the matrix/fracture!
continuum scale consequences
avg momentum → describes the macroscopic velocity field
heat transfer → describing a random molecular movement w/ no net flux across a macroscopic interface
fick’s 1st law
Diffusive flux is proportional to the particle concentration gradient!
pure advection
keeps the shape of a concentration profile, but translates the center of mass (=flow)
pure diffusion
keeps the center of mass of the species, but eliminates concentration gradients (smearing out)
gas diffusion coefficient parameters
temp
pressure
molecular weight
molecular diameter
dissipative processes
Molecular diffusion
Electrochemical migration → diffusion of charged species induced by the electrical potential (driving force).
Diffusion in concentrated solutions driven by the gradient of the chemical potential rather than by the concentration gradient.
dispersion
macriscopic process of spreading of mass from highly concentrated areas to less concentrated areas, depending on the heterogeneities in the flow path
dispersion types
mechanical/ tailor → results for the fact that variations of the flow velocity exist not captured in advective transport witch only considered an average flow rate
macro
tortuosity
tailor dispersion process
in a capillary tube, the flow close to the tube wall is slower than in the center → leads to a velocity distribution and hence to a smearing of the tracer (solute) front.
why is tortousity length squared?
affects the flow twice
the velocity
driving force
microscopic dispersion
Molecular diffusion – related to the thermal motion of molecules – independent of advective processes.
Mechanical dispersion (velocity distribution) due to the flow profile in a single capillary (Poiseuille profile).
Dispersion by tortuosity due to pathways of different
length within an REV of porous media flow.
mobility
𝑴 > 𝟏: unfavorable → high-K is invaded more easily and flow resistance is decreasing with time → displacement is unstable.
𝑴 < 𝟏: favorable mobility ratio → high perm layer initially invaded faster than low permeable layers, but flow in high-K slows down with time due to increasing resistance to flow.