1/52
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
poverty level to qualify for free lunch vs reduced lunch
free = <130% FPL
reduced = <185% FPL
head start provides ____ while healthy start provides ____ to young children
education, healthcare
epidemiology
basic science of public health
how and why health conditions are distributed in various populations
investigates all the factors that determine the presence or absence of a disease, condition, or health issue and how it effects our society
internal vs external validity
internal: whether the cause and effect relationship between a treatment and outcome can be trustworthy
if internal validity is low we cannot determine causality
external: how well the outcome can be generalized to the real world and other situations, people, settings, measures
while quasi-experimental studies have high external validity because they REALLY apply to the specific group studied
temporality
the requirement that the exposure must precede the effect and is necessary to determine causality between an exposure and outcome
case control is…
always retrospective and observational
quasi-experimental
high external validity … has an intervention but not a randomized sample size so it’s very valid for the sample specifically studied though difficult to prove causality
(has no control group)
ex: following a group of patients before and after a specific treatment
ecological fallicy
the assumption that what is seen for the population level holds true for the individual
reproducibility
tool provides the same results or the same subjects over time
ex: participants take one test, then repeat it months later (if no intervention then results should be similar)
internal consistency
related items in one tool are consistent
ex: when measuring food insecurity, all questions must align with the same definition of food insecurity
interrater reliability
the data COLLECTORS are consistent
graphs
histogram
pie chart
bar graph
to summarize data collected over time, rectangle with areas proportional to frequency of variable, width is equal to class interval
best for when there is a bunch of data in one variable (measuring BMI in each grade, measuring bug size in different species)
vs line is best for one subject/group OVER TIME
percentages
best for vertical scale
types of validity
construct validity
face validity
criterion validity
how well a tool measures what it is supposed to without picking up unrelated factors
measuring appropriate food security status
comes from pilot testing with intended audience - is this tool suitable for the population?
those who have very low food insecurity recognize that this test appears to measure this topic
how well one measure predicts the outcome of another
# of nights dinner was skipped because no food was available accurately predicted food insecurity status
test-retest reliability
same as reproducibility
what food intake measurement tool is suitable for large studies, is inexpensive, and can focus on one specific nutrient?
food frequency questionnaire
low food security vs very low food security
low: ability to use strategies to avoid hunger
very low: eating patterns are disrupted or reduced
NHANES
has specific methodology to collect more data from low income groups
oversamples ^ risk groups (low income, over 60, african/hispanic)
correlation
no relationship: r <0.4
moderate strength: r 0.4-0.7
strong: r 0.7-1
perfect relationship: r = 1
anything over 1 is not valid
nutritional epidemiology vs nutritional status
epidemiology: determines relationship between dietary factors and influence on etiology, occurrence, prevention, treatment
status: condition of population or individual health influenced by intake and utilization of nutrients and non nutrients
NSI
nutrition screening initiative - nutrition for elderly / identifies nutrition problems sooner
steps of a needs assessment
define nutrition problem
assessment parameters
background conditions, data, target population
analyze/interpret data
share findings
set priorities
plan of action
which age range / demographic least likely to have nutrition info targeted towards them?
healthy adults 25-65
planning evaluation criteria happens when during program development?
every single stage
(or.. just assessment? getting mixed info from different sources)
inferential statistics
lets you draw probably conclusions beyond your immediate universe of data; focuses on probability
frequent symptom of malnutrition in community surveys
low hemoglobin
demographics does NOT include…
socioeconomic factors
(It actually is but this is what Jean Inman says? I have beef with her)
main function of the public health nutritionist
assess the needs of the community
food synergy
the additive influence of foods and constituents which when eaten have a beneficial impact on health
dietary component of NHANES
WWEIA (what we eat in america)
where did healthy people 2030 come from?
the outgrowth of a report by the surgeon general under DHHS and it’s redone every few years by the office of disease prevention and health promotion
goals = broad, population level characteristics not individual intake and not focused on individual nutrients
objectives = measurable and specific (but still population level)
an appropriate measurement for iron status in a local community is
hematocrit
prepared and perishable food programs
links sources of unused, cooked, and fresh foods with social service agencies that serve the hungry
nutrition surveillance program
identifies nutritional needs of the population
first step in implementation of a community based program (and what are the steps?)
obtain administrative support
develop mission statement
goals
measurable objectives
RDI’s are most effective tool
^this info from jean inman
Pocketprep says…
conduct a needs assessment
develop program goals and objectives
develop a program plan
identify funding sources
seek support from stakeholders
funding for public health programs comes primarily from …
general revenue (money that can be used for a variety of purposes)
Similar to a block grant (money from federal —> state) though block grants may have more restrictions on what the money can be used for, while this is free-range
Determine checklist
assesses elderly risk factors for poor nutritional status or malnutrition
Disease
Eating poorly
Tooth loss
Economic hardship
Reduced social contact
Multiple medicines
Involuntary weight changes
Needs self care assistance
Elders above 80
PEACH
survey for use in childs early prevention programs - Parent Eating and nutrition Assessment for Children with special Health needs
Level I NSI
for use by social service professionals to identify those in need of food assistance and nutrition therapy (seniors) and does take into account anthropometric measures
Level II NSI
for use by health and medical professionals to identify seniors at high nutritional risk (takes into account clinical information)
what is the next step after meeting a performance indicator?
evaluate the need to continue monitoring indicator data
HRA
health risk appraisal- calculates a populations general health status
a place is designated as a food desert if the nearest supermarket or grocery store is how far away?
rural
urban
rural - > 10 miles away
urban 1-3 miles away
mortality vs morbidity vs case fatality rate
deaths
illness/condition
proportion of individuals who diet from a specific disease among those who have been diagnosed with it (%)
best way to disseminate nutrition information in a cost effective manner to reach the highest % of low education, minority adults with few resources
social media
nutrigenetics vs nutrigenomics
nutrigenetics: study of how genetic factors can affect nutrient metabolism and how this impacts health outcomes
nutrigenomics: how diet and lifestyle influence gene expression
nutrition transition
shift in diet from high complex CHO and fiber to increase in fat, sat fat, and sugar and this occurs as income increases
health disparity
difference in disease burden or outcome for a specific group compared to the general population
CDC’s REACH program
Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health - national program to reduce racial and ethnic health disparities
evaluations:
outcome
summative
formative
process
outcome: behavior focused, what the participants of the program can do or achieve after, or clinical outcome
summative: knowledge effectiveness of overall education plan
formative: during the learning process to get feedback (like our SEL surveys when TA’ing, we’d give them mid-semester to identify strengths and weaknesses)
process: how well the program is being implemented (people attending, tools being used) and whether actives are being delivered as intended
what age group does YRBSS target
9-12 grade (high school)
case control studies investigate…
disease with rare outcomes
IRB main role is to
protect HUMAN subjects they’re not worries about outlining all the ethical failings of a study
significance tests…
paired t test
independent t test
chi squared
ANOVA
paired t: to see significant differences in values in the same person or group over time
independent t: “ “ different groups / different people
chi squared: categorical data
ANOVA: multiple different groups at once