Investigation of Crime Scene Evidence Test 1

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/35

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

36 Terms

1
New cards

a DNA analyst, a detective, a fingerprint examiner, a prosecutor

Who is not a trier of fact in the list below?

-member of the jury

-judge

-a detective

-a fingerprint examiner

-a prosecutor

-a DNA analyst

2
New cards

questioned items typically come from a crime scene, while known items have a chain of custody that link them to a specific source or person.

What is the difference between questioned items and known items?

  • questioned items typically come from a crime scene, while known items have a chain of custody that link them to a specific source or person.

  • questioned items are those that are returned by an AFIS system or similar computer system for comparison with a known item from a crime scene. 

3
New cards
  • two objects may appear identical at the level at which we observe them or can remember them (e.g. two new pennies produced by the same mint in the same year).

  • although each item is unique, so is every impression left by that object, and sometimes the impressions are degraded enough to confuse the impression with the wrong item.

If every item is unique, why is it sometimes difficult to make the case for an identification?

  • two objects may appear identical at the level at which we observe them or can remember them (e.g. two new pennies produced by the same mint in the same year).

  • although each item is unique, so is every impression left by that object, and sometimes the impressions are degraded enough to confuse the impression with the wrong item.

4
New cards

Type 1 error

an error that typically occurs when you accuse someone via a test result bu they are not actually guilty

5
New cards

Type 2 error

a test result that exonorates someone who was actually guilty

6
New cards

positive control

a substance that is used to verify that a test reagent is functioning properly by producing a result

7
New cards

negative control

a substance that is used to verify that a test reagent is functioning properly by producing no result

8
New cards

false positive

a result where you declare that a substance is present but it is, no present

9
New cards

false negative

a situation where your test produces no result but in fact the tested-for substance was actually present

10
New cards

latent print

the kind of print left unintentionally, typically by a suspect or victim at a crime scene

11
New cards

exemplar print

a high quality (usually) record or impression taken on a scanner or using ink

12
New cards

we multiply the prior odds by the lieklihood ratio

For example, based on other evidence, you might consider the prior odds that the child was abused as 2:1, meaning you think that the child was twice as likely to be abused as not abused.  

How do you create the posterior odds?

  • we multiply the prior odds by the likelihood ratio

  • we add the prior odds to the likelihood ratio

  • we divide the prior odds by the likelihood ratio

13
New cards

a blood pattern analyst concluses that a pattern is forward spatter froma gunshot because they observe brain matter next to the sample

Which of the following is NOT examples of base rate fallacies???

  • a fingerprint examiner receive a comparison from a detective who almost always gets the rigth suspect.

  • a TSA agent is more likely to inspect the bag from a person wearing a turban.

  • a blood pattern analyst concluses that a pattern is forward spatter from a gunshot because they observe brain matter next to the sample

  • a medical examiner determines a cause of death by the boyfriend of a mother is assumed to be murder while a cause of death by a grandmother caretaker is an accident.

14
New cards

you tend to think about biases more and you end up sucumbing to them more

Why can’t experts overcome biases by knowledge and willpower?

15
New cards

knowing the make and model of a firearm when doing a firearms comparison

what is not an example of a reference materials bias?

  • looking at an exemplar print from a suspect in custody and using it to infer the location of minutia in a noisy are of the latent print (called ‘reverse comparison’)

  • knowing the make and model of a firearm when doing a firearms comparison

  • a fingerprint database suggests a print for comparison that comes from a database that only contains convicted criminals

  • using a suspect’s DNA profile to guide the interpretation of a complex DNA mixture

16
New cards

the focus of attention, what visual features the participant thinks is relevant for the task, where the eyes point

what does an eye tracker record?

17
New cards

Mated, non mated

What items belong to the ground truth?

18
New cards

method

When reading an article, which section contains the details of the study design and data collection?

19
New cards

No, because these studies only measure the overall accuracy of a discipline

When conducting ‘Black Box’ tests, do the study authors care about how the subjects came to their conclusion?

20
New cards

erroneous exclusions

There are 2 kinds of errors: erroneous identifications (false positives), and erroneous exclusions (false negatives). Which error rate was larger in the Black Box study?

21
New cards

the evidence is not probative, because it does not bear directly on the question of who might have committed the crime

If you run a DNA test that places a suspect at their own home and this is presented to a jury, why might that be a problem?

22
New cards

probative evidence

evidence that is useful in proving something in the case

23
New cards

exculpatory evidence

evidence that tends to show the defendant is not guilty

24
New cards

foundational evidence

evidence required to show that a method meets admissibility standards

25
New cards

the number or correct identifications would decrease and the number of erroneous identifications would decrease

suppose the examiner becomes more risk averse with their identification threshold. What would happen to the correct identifications and erroneous identifications?

26
New cards

expert immunity

experts are inherently objective and accurate, so their judgments don’t need to be questioned

27
New cards

technological protection

advanced tools or technologies make error or bias impossible

28
New cards

ethical issues

ethical training or professional codes are enough to prevent misconduct or bias

29
New cards

bias blind spot

other people are biased, but I am not

30
New cards

illusion of control

experts or organizations believe they can fully control or monitor the sources of error or misconduct

31
New cards

bad apples

errors or misconduct only happen because of a few bad individuals

32
New cards

we multiply the prior odds times the likelihood ratio to produce the posterior odds

How do we update our prior odds with the likelihood ratio to produce the posterior odds?

33
New cards

Ninhydrin

develops latent prints on porous surfaces like paper by reacting with amino acids in latent print residue. in a fume hood, the specimens are submerged in the ninhydrin solution and then air dried.

34
New cards

glue fuming

fumes from cyanoacrylate ester adhesives (super glue) will develop latent prints by binding the proteins in the prints. the super glue is heated in the presence of water to create fumes.

35
New cards

point-counting standard

how many points of comparison are required before a positive conclusion could be reached

36
New cards

base rate fallacy

When forensic experts or decision-makers focus too much on a particular piece of evidence, they might ignore how rare or common the event actually is in the broader context.