easiest method
not time consuming
biased as sample is drawn from a small part of the target population
tend to be ethnocentric
takes more time and effort
may be biased as selected pps may not agree to participate
convenient
pps less likely to drop out
anonymity/confidentiality
deception
informed consent
privacy
right to withdraw
protection from harm
respect
competence
responsibility
integrity
informed consent
confidentiality
privacy
right to withdraw
protection from harm
debriefing
avoiding deception
addressing misconduct
debriefing
ethics committee (institutional review board)
presumptive consent (asking ppl if they’d participate in your study)
can be easily repeated (high external validity)
pps more likely to reveal confidential info compared to interview
easy to analyse
easy to draw conclusions
(as closed questions produce quantitative data)
may not permit ppl to express precise feelings (low validity)
oversimplifies reality
provides rich detail
respondents aren’t restricted to preconceived categories (high validity)
harder to analyse
difficult to draw conclusions
objective way to represent feelings and attitudes
creates quantitative data to easy to analyse
respondents may avoid end up scales so answers don’t represent true feelings (low validity)
doesn’t provide detailed answers as it produces quantitative data
likert rating scale
semantic differential rating scale
easily repeated (high external reliability)
easier to analyse as answers are more predictable
more detailed information can be obtained
can access info that may not be revealed by predetermined questions
observer may ‘see’ what they expect to see (observer bias)
observations cannot provide information about what people think/feel
objective methods to separate behaviour
categories are listed, each with a code (coding frame)
categories may not cover all possible behaviour (low validity)
poorly designed coding frame also reduces reliability/validity
making observing behaviour more manageable as it avoids having to record everything
useful when behaviour being recorded only happens occasionally
observer may miss some observations (low validity)
observations may not be representative
makes observing behaviour more manageable as it avoids having to record everything
allows for tracking of time-related changes in behaviour
observer may miss some observations (low validity)
observations may not be representative
behaviours are inevitably missed as important behaviour may occur outside of interval (low validity)
pps may know they’re being observed which alters their behaviour (demand characteristics)
little control of other variables
useful when behaviour to be studied is largely unpredictable
useful in initial investigations (pilot study)
likely to provide special insights to behaviour
able to monitor and record behaviour in closer detail
objectivity reduced (observer bias)
more difficult to record and monitor non-suspiciously if the observer is part of the group being observed
good control over pp variables because same person is tested twice
fewer pps needed than with an independent measures design
order/practice effects
pps may guess purpose of experiment
condition A may be easier than condition B
no order/practice effects
avoids pps guessing aim of experiment
no control of pp variables
needs more pps than repeated measures design
controls for pp variables
avoids order/practice effects