LSAT

Logical fallacy example

“You’re biased, so you’re wrong” is a common logical fallacy on the LSAT. Watch out for this one—you’re sure to see it again.

Flaw questions are about finding the one answer that correctly describes something the argument did wrong. You can think of it in two parts: First, the argument must definitely have done this thing you’re accusing them of doing. Second, it must be wrong, logically, to do it.

Necessary Assumption example

We’re looking for a Necessary Assumption, something the author has to agree with. This is where attacking the argument comes in handy.

Disagree question

we are looking for the answer that we can prove X thinks one way on, that Y thinks differently about.

Don’t overcomplicate these Role questions.

The correct answer is almost always “it’s a premise” or “it’s the conclusion.” Start there, and dig deeper only when necessary.

what is an agrument

a premise + a conclusion

premise

a claim that SUPPORTS —> another claim

conclusion

just a claim

assumption

• not every argument contains an assumption

• but most arguments do contain an assumption

• IT IS: AN UNSTATED PREMISE

altruistic

showing an unselfish concern for the welfare, needs, and happiness of others, often at a cost or disadvantage to yourself

Synonyms: Selfless, charitable, humanitarian.