EMSA (Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/57

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

58 Terms

1
New cards

EMSA

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay

2
New cards

Central question of EMSA

Does protein X bind to DNA Y (radiolabeled)?

3
New cards

What EMSA detects

DNA–protein interactions

4
New cards

How EMSA detects interactions

By observing changes in electrophoretic mobility on a gel

5
New cards

Key idea of EMSA

DNA–protein complexes migrate more slowly than free DNA

6
New cards

Which migrates faster

Free DNA migrates faster than DNA bound to protein

7
New cards

Where samples are loaded

At wells at the top of the gel

8
New cards

Effect of increasing protein concentration

More DNA appears shifted upward (slower migration)

9
New cards

What we visualize in EMSA

Radiolabeled DNA, not protein

10
New cards

Why only DNA is seen

Because DNA is radiolabeled, while protein is not

11
New cards

Bands for DNA–protein complexes

Higher, slower-moving bands

12
New cards

Bands for free DNA

Lower, faster-moving bands

13
New cards

Why DNA–protein bands move slowly

Complex is larger and migrates more slowly

14
New cards

Why free DNA bands move quickly

Smaller and migrates faster through the gel

15
New cards

What happens if multiple proteins bind

A “super shift” occurs (slower movement)

16
New cards

Definition of a super shift

Slower migration caused by multiple proteins and/or antibody bound to DNA

17
New cards

Case 1 of super shift

Two proteins bind at different DNA sites

18
New cards

Case 2 of super shift

One protein binds DNA, another protein binds the first protein

19
New cards

Effect of super shift

Even slower movement than DNA–protein complexes

20
New cards

Input DNA alone

Produces a fast-moving band at the bottom

21
New cards

Protein + input DNA

Produces two bands: DNA–protein complex and free DNA

22
New cards

Competitor DNA

Another DNA added to compete with input DNA for protein binding

23
New cards

Two characteristics of competitor DNA

(1) Cold (unlabeled), (2) Added in excess

24
New cards

Why competitor DNA is in excess

Increases probability of protein binding to competitor instead of input DNA

25
New cards

Specific competitor definition

DNA sequence that the protein can bind

26
New cards

Effect of specific competitor

Protein binds competitor DNA more than input DNA

27
New cards

Bands visible with specific competitor

Only free input DNA (competitor DNA is unlabeled)

28
New cards

Non-specific competitor definition

DNA sequence the protein cannot bind

29
New cards

Effect of non-specific competitor

Protein still binds input DNA

30
New cards

Bands visible with non-specific competitor

  1. Input DNA alone

  2. input DNA–protein complex

31
New cards

Antibody role in EMSA

Verifies that the DNA shift is due to the protein of interest

32
New cards

Effect of antibody binding

Antibody binds protein, causing a super shift

33
New cards

Bands possible with antibody

  1. Free DNA

  2. DNA–protein complex

  3. DNA–protein–antibody super shift

34
New cards

Why not all antibody bands appear

Depends on protein/antibody concentrations and affinities

35
New cards

If antibody is in excess

DNA–protein band may disappear (all complexes super-shifted)

36
New cards

What EMSA autoradiogram shows

Only radiolabeled DNA species

37
New cards

Competitor DNAs on autoradiogram

Not visible (unlabeled)

38
New cards

Lane with input DNA only

Single fast-moving DNA band

39
New cards

Lane with protein + input DNA

DNA alone band + DNA–protein complex band

40
New cards

Lane with protein + specific competitor + input DNA

Mostly free input DNA band

41
New cards

Lane with protein + non-specific competitor + input DNA

Free DNA and DNA–protein complex

42
New cards

Lane with protein + antibody + input DNA

Free DNA, DNA–protein, and super-shifted DNA–protein–antibody

43
New cards

Why radiolabeling is essential

Ensures only input DNA is visualized

44
New cards

Reason for slower migration of complexes

Larger molecular complexes migrate more slowly

45
New cards

Reason for competitor DNA excess

Outcompetes labeled DNA probabilistically

46
New cards

Limitation of EMSA with multiple proteins

Cannot distinguish which protein binds DNA

47
New cards

Four indistinguishable EMSA cases

Protein A + DNA;

Protein B + DNA;

Protein A + Protein B + DNA;

Protein A–Protein B + DNA

48
New cards

How to confirm which protein binds DNA

Add an antibody specific to that protein

49
New cards

Technique to map DNA binding sequences

DNA footprinting

50
New cards

Role of footprinting vs EMSA

Footprinting shows exact binding sequences; EMSA shows whether binding occurs

51
New cards

Main use of EMSA

Detecting DNA–protein interactions

52
New cards

Competitors are always

Cold (unlabeled) and in excess

53
New cards

What specific competitors demonstrate

Sequence-specific protein binding

54
New cards

What non-specific competitors demonstrate

No binding to unrelated sequences

55
New cards

Antibody-induced super shift demonstrates

The DNA–protein complex contains the protein of interest

56
New cards

Limitation of EMSA

Cannot identify which protein binds when multiple are present

57
New cards

Changing competitor sequence provides

Insight into DNA sequence preferences of the protein

58
New cards

Alternative method to study binding

DNA footprinting (complements EMSA)