1. Introduction to Judicial Review & Standing

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/9

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

10 Terms

1
New cards

What is judicial review?

It's the main legal mechanism of accountability for public power. It's supervisory, not an appeal

2
New cards

What is the main question asked in judicial review?

Is the challenged decision or action lawful? It does not assess if it was a good decision

3
New cards

Who can bring a judicial review claim (standing)?

A claimant must demonstrate "sufficient interest" in the matter, as per S31(3) Senior Courts Act 198

4
New cards

What is 'standing' in judicial review?

It's the legal right (locus standi) to bring judicial review proceedings before the court

5
New cards

When is standing generally granted?

When a decision directly affects a person’s personal rights or interests, or for sufficient public interest

6
New cards

What counts as "sufficient interest"?

It's flexible, going beyond just personal interest, balancing rule of law and preventing "busybodies"

7
New cards

Can a group have "sufficient interest" for standing?

Yes, courts may grant standing to pressure groups or organisations for the public interest

8
New cards

What factors support "public interest" standing?

An arguable case, no other responsible challenger, significant public importance, claimant's genuine motivation or expertise

9
New cards

Give an example of a group granted standing.

Greenpeace was granted standing because its members were genuinely concerned and it was well-qualified

10
New cards

Is "sufficient interest" the same for human rights cases?

No, Human Rights Act 1998 s7 uses a narrower "victim" test, requiring actual affectation