1/72
chapman university
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
knowledge (jtb)
Justified True Belief - knowledge is true and a belief, but most importantly justified.
TRUTH (Correspondence Theory)
The correspondence theory in its simplest form says that truth is a connection to reality.
logical fallacy definition
a reasoning error that weakens or invalidates the argument
equivocation fallacy
alternating between the different meanings of a word in the argument’s premises
can be avoided by clearly defining the term in the debate
epistemology
Epistemology is the “how”, the framework of the beliefs, not necessarily the content
It’s the study of knowledge and it’s methods
what to rationalists believe?
Rationalists believe “There are cases where the content of our concepts or knowledge outstrips the information that sense experience can provide” - basically reason is the primary source of knowledge, not necessarily senses
rationalism (plato) definiton
to reason, to have knowledge of things that aren’t shifting, not using the senses, isn’t physical— these ideas exist apart from us
empiricism
dea that knowledge comes exclusively from sensory perceptions
who coined empiricism
john locke (homeboy)
metaphysics - the what
Before, after, and beyond the physical, all of reality
The exploration of the essence or nature of reality itself
What is reality, what does it mean to be human, a person
dualism
the idea that there is a physical part of reality and one that goes beyond the senses but is grasped by our sense of reasoning
what does dualism connect to
metaphysics
qualitative identity
Relation that one thing X, bears to another thing Y (two toys by same maker)
x and y came from z
Numerical Identity
X is the very same thing as Y (share all of the their essential qualities)
x=y
Synchronic numerical identity
same time
Synchronic numerical identity is simply to match the known essential properties of a substance with the thing in front of us
same time
Diachronic numerical identity
answering the question how does a substance maintain its numerical identity over time
Diachronic = through time
SOUL THEORY (Descartes)
Person X at time T is numerical idneticall to person Y at time T + 1 if and only if X and Y share the same soul
MEMORY THEORY / PSYCHOLOGICAL (Locke)
Psychological Continuity Theory– Person X and Person Y are diachronically numerically identical if and only if X and Y are psychologically continuous (Y’s mental network is well connected to X’s mental network, AKA their sum of total mental states- beliefs, desires, moods, conscious/unconscious minds)
Locke’s revised version
CRITICISM of PSYCHOLOGICAL
criticism – Parfit believes “personal identity” is too vague to be of any philosophical importance, it’s an insoluble problem
Bundle Theory
the philosopher David Hume thinks we should abandon the concept of diachronic numerical identity
Instead he offers a philosophical consolation prize: the self changes in so many and in such deep ways that a self cannot be said to be a single person over the course of its life
However some criticize this, saying if you convict a criminal, they eventually become a different person, if you sign a contract, you’re not always you
free will
The canonical design for a significant kind of control over one's actions
compatibalism
past determines the future, the determination comes within ourselves
free will is compatible with determinism
incompatibilism
if determinism is true, then free will cannot exist.
hard determinism (incompatibilism)
the belief that all events are caused by past events, noting other than what does occur could occur
soft determinism (compatibilism)
substance dualism (mind-body dualism) - the mind and the body are two separate substances and therefore have different properties
Past determines the future
The determination comes within ourselves
When the action is self-determined - it should be considered free
Free will is compatible with determism
the MIND
debates on if the body rules the mind or if the mind rules the body
substance dualism (descartes) the mind doesn’t occupy space in the body
materialists - consicousness and man can be entirely explained as a physical phenomenom
substance dualism - descartes, metaphysics
(part of the body not being a physical thing), he doesn’t believe in determinism, which is based on laws of physics
Descartes feels a machine cannot have free will
materialism
the mind rules the body, physicalism
Materialists believe “consciousness can be entirely explained as a physical phenomena; it is a matter of brain mechanics”
EPIPHENOMENALISM (property dualism)
Epiphenomenalism (property dualism)– having a physical body, while having a nonphysical aspect (ex: qualia)
instead of separate physical and mental worlds, there is one world where everything has both physical mental properties
qualia
The special indescribable inner experiences we all have
combination of all 5 sensed to create a unique detailed experience, are private no one will know what it is like
Conscious seeming behavior is not enough to demonstrate one has qualia
The qualia of an entity are separate and cannot be determined from the physical facts about it
Some philosophers claim these problems surrounding qualia strengthen the dualist argument - must be non physical
ZOMBIE
zombies in philosophy
Zombies in philosophy are imaginary creatures designed to illuminate problems about consciousness and its relation to the physical world
They are exactly like us in all physical respects but without conscious experiences - there is nothing it is like to be a zombie
strong ai
Strong AI claim properly programmed computers can generate consciousness on its own
weak ai
narrow systems that excel at specific tasks within limited contexts
DESCARTES’ TWO TESTS
Descartes believes these are the criteria to having a mind (dualist)
Turing does as well
Language use
Universal general problem solving
turing test
a computer would be considered intelligent if it’s conversation couldn’t be distinguished from a humans
Turing’s “Imitation Game”, became known as “Turing Test”— if a computer could convince a human it was human, that meant it was capable of original thought/intelligent
For Turing it didn’t matter how it happened, but if they (machine and human) had the same outcome, it was a thinking
Turing does as well (materialist)
Language use
Universal general problem solving
chinese room/chess room
Chinese room thought experiment
John Searle’s idea
Boxes of chinese symbols and a book of instructions for the manipulating the symbols in the program
The program enables the person in the room to pass the turing test for understanding chinese but he does not understand a word of chinese
The idea of weak AI - no understanding of what it is doing
Gary Marcus’ REVISED TURING TEST
he said that a truly intelligent computer could "watch any arbitrary TV program or YouTube video and answer questions about its content—'Why did Russia invade Crimea?' or 'Why did Walter White consider taking a hit out on Jessie?'"
watch an episode of “The Simpsons,” and tell us when to laugh.
Gary Marcus’
elf ranger test
beth singler
AI are usually chosen for games of intelligence like chess but never for creativity
Dungeon and Dragons Elf Ranger
These experiences have non of the open ended colbation of D&D - (has a lot of storytelling)
Instead of turing test -there should be elf ranger test testing on the creativity of AI in D&D games
lovelace test
An artificial agent designed by a human to pass the test only if it origiantes a program that it was not engineer to produce
must be the result of processes the artificial can reproduce
The agents designers must ot be able to explain how their original code led to this program
creativity
DARPA ROBOTICS CHALLENGE
Fukushima Nuclear Disaster (2011) inspires more robotics and DARPA robotics challenge which attempts to make autonomous machines
ROBOT (Sense Think Act Paradigm)
Define a robot as a machine that senses, thinks, and acts – a robot must have sensors, processing ability that emulates cognition, and actuators
ROBOT (Etymology / Word Origin)
Robot first appears in Karel Cpaek’s play R.U.R (1920)
derived from the Czech work robota - making it clear that Capek intended his drama to comment on slavery, class, race, and social revolution (forced labor)
ANDROID (Etymology / Word Origin)
An android is an automaton with human-like appearance
The term was popularized by the french science fiction novel “the future eve” in 1886
Android is derived from the greek roots - Andros, meaning man and eidos meaning form
ALLEGORY OF THE CAVE
Platos thought experiment on reality
Platos theory of forms - everything has a pure form - soul
Person is locked in a cave and believes that the shadows on the all are the real thing but then is freed and experiences outside the cave true forms
ETHICS
The systematic rational search for answers to moral questions
Morality is all that concerns our beliefs about right and wrong actions and good or bad persons or character
VIRTUE (Aristotle)
“Emphasize the role of character and virtue in moral philosophy rather than either doing one duty or acting in order to bring about good consequences.”
Golden Mean
Two vices, vice of excess, vice of not doing enough
Most virtue ethics take inspiration from Aristotle, who stated that a virtuous person is someone who has ideal character traits
What would a virtuous person do in that situation - follow that, and you will become a virtuous person
Rejects Objective moral principles - certain circumstances demand certain actions
friendship of utility
These friendships are based on what someone can do for you, or what you can do for another person
friendship of pleasure
shared interests, someone you go out for drinks with or enjoy a particular hobby
virtue friendship
aristotle approved, based as it is on the character of two self-sufficient equals, is a lot more stable than the previous two categories.
CONSEQUENTIALISM / UTILITARIANISM (ethics)
Utility is that
Object moral principles
These claims are often summarised in the slogan -the greatest happiness for the greatest numbe
principle of utility
Simply stated, the moral action in every citation is the action that brings about the greatest good for the greatest number.
Happiness for utilitarianism means maximising pleasure and minimizing pain
NONCONSEQUENTIALISM / DEONTOLOGY
We have a duty/ obligation to act according to what the dictates is objectively good or bad. There are objective moral principles. These moral principles can be identified by using reason and the categorical imperative.
Kant’s theory
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
Kant’s theories
= Commands you must follow regardless, of your desires. Moral obligations are derived from pure reason
Hanson Robotics’ SOPHIA
Sophia was granted citizenship in Saudi Arabia
Non human things have been granted personhood
David Gunkel
Idea of the robot invasion
Robots are already here - using sense the act paradigm
These machines are already around - not coming from our future already here
Gary Marcus
he said that a truly intelligent computer could "watch any arbitrary TV program or YouTube video and answer questions about its content—'Why did Russia invade Crimea?' or 'Why did Walter White consider taking a hit out on Jessie?'"
watch an episode of “The Simpsons,” and tell us when to laugh.
Gary Marcus’
John Searle
Chinese room thought experiment
John Searle’s idea
Boxes of chinese symbols and a book of instructions for the manipulating the symbols in the program
The program enables the person in the room to pass the turing test for understanding chinese but he does not understand a word of chinese
The idea of weak AI - no understanding of what it is doing
Immanuel Kant
Every rational being exists as an end in himself and not merely as a means to be arbitrarily used by this or that
Jeremy Bentham
If something is experiencing pain, we have a direct moral obligation to it
Bentham - vegetarian - pains from eating animals outweigh pleasure from gaining the meat
Can a robot have rights
Should robot have rights
David Chalmers
Philosophist David Chalmers (an epiphenomenalist) believes to have qualia is almost the same thing as to be conscious
Beth Singler
Beth Singler
AI are usually chosen for games of intelligence like chess but never for creativity
Dungeon and Dragons Elf Ranger
These experiences have non of the open ended colbation of D&D - (has a lot of storytelling)
Instead of turing test -there should be elf ranger test testing on the creativity of AI in D&D games
René Descartes
(part of the body not being a physical thing), he doesn’t believe in determinism, which is based on laws of physics
Descartes feels a machine cannot have free will
Person X at time T is numerical idneticall to person Y at time T + 1 if and only if X and Y share the same soul
Descartes believes these are the criteria to having a mind (dualist)
Turing does as well
Language use
Universal general problem solving
Alan Turing
British Computer scientist
Created the Imitation game/turing test
TURING TEST: a computer would be considered intelligent if it’s conversation couldn’t be distinguished from a humans
Turing and Descartes agree that language use and problem-solving are the two necessities for consciousness
However, Turing is a materialist, whereas Descartes is a dualist
Daniel Dennett (materialist)
Daniel Dennett says NO– there is nothing about the experience of seeing color that exists separate from the physical data. Our experience of qualia is only the processing of data, not something distinct from the process itself. Mental events are physical events, consciousness is an illusion.
Mary just didn’t have all the information in the first place, her seeing color was just getting more information
EX: the blue banana, Mary would know it was a blue banana idk
Materialists deny the existence of qualia and consciousness. Dennett says humans are just “moist robots”
Frank Jackson (epiphenomenalism)
Mary the Color Scientist, thought experiment by Frank Jackson
Mary grew up in a room, learning everything to know about color vision– except, she has never experienced color herself before, she was taught completely in black and white– does she know, for example, the color red, when she finally steps outside.
Frank Jackson says YES. There is a qualia that cannot be known solely through the accumulation of physical facts
Derek Parfit
Critiques Locke’s theory on continuity of identity
Locke’s revised version
criticism – Parfit believes “personal identity” is too vague to be of any philosophical importance, it’s an insoluble problem
John Donaher
he is a modern philosopher, he talks about artificial intelligence im not really sure tbh
Boston Dynamics’ ATLAS
Boston Dynamic's Atlas robot is probably the most advanced humanoid robot that exist, while doing parkour is very impressive
Competed in Darpa robotics
Has evolved quickly in the last ten years - much improvement
Vaucanson’s FLUTE PLAYER
Automaton
Played the flute as well as a human
Used stacks of CAMs to control the automaton movments
18th century
Plato
Plato believes in “the forms”: a universal, immaterial, eternal, and unchanging form of every object or idea in the material world
Your soul started in the realm of forms, and should return there
You aren’t learning new things, rather recollecting from your soul
Plato believed in dualism: the idea that there is a physical part of reality and one that goes beyond the senses but is grasped by our sense of reasoning
Because physical things are in constant change, you cannot know them
The form of something is distinct from an example of it, ex: form of roundness is different than round objects, since they change
JUST WAR THEORY
Created by Thomas Aquinas
Asks Jus ad bellum (is going to war just)
Have a just cause
Being the last resort
Right intention
End being proportion to the means used
Jus in Bello (How must one act in war?)
Discrimination and proportionality
IBM’s DEEPBLUE & WATSON
Deep Blue and IBM Watson are both AI systems developed by IBM that demonstrate the company's capabilities in artificial intelligence (AI
Deep Blue
A chess-playing supercomputer that defeated world chess champion Garry Kasparov in 1997
IBM Watson
A system that defeated Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter in the 2011 Jeopardy! Challenge