1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
tremblay v kimball
pharmacist must possess ordinary knowledge and skill
stupid mistake → negligent
(does not need to be extraordinary or smartest pharmacist)
riff v morgan pharmacy
pharmacists have duty to warn
failure to warn about potential risks associated with prescribed drug → liable
“but for the actions of the pharmacist, would the patient have ben injured“
in re kinsman transit co
proximate cause, chain of causation, foreseeability, jointly and severally liable
initial negligence caused chain of events which resulted in foreseeable risk to public
palsgraf v long island railroad
no foreseeability (limiting duty of care), no liability
summers v tice
alternative liability - multiple defendants, burden of proof shift to defendants
jointly and severally liable, both negligent
portee v jaffee
parent can recover for emotional distress caused by negligence that lead to injury of another
psychological injury to a parent witnessing the violent death of her child is clearly foreseeable
tj hooper
custom does not dictate standard of care
no radio = unseaworthiness
tugboat tower → negligent