1/77
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Murdock
4 Functions: sexual, reproductive, economic, educational
Parsons
Stabilisation of adult personalities, socialisation, norms, geographical mobility, instrumental and expressive roles, warm bath
[eval: conflict theories criticise for being optimistic, Ansley & Zaretsky question ‘warm bath‘ as tool of opression and distraction, family doesn’t benefit everyone]
Engels
Patriarchal monogamous family maintains capitalism, property
Zaretsky
Unit of consumption
Warm bath distraction
[eval: too negative, omits positiove emotional benefits, negates role of women, outdated]
Benson (New Right)
Cohabiting couples are more likely to break down than married ones
Murray
Underclass has been created through an over generous welfare state
Somerville
Social policies have freed women and the family is no longer a patriarchal institution
Firestone
Separation of the sexes
Ansley
against warm bath theory ‘takers of shit’
[eval.: too negative, generalised and assumes women are passive (postmodern & intersectional/liberal feminists, Stacey, Sommerville), forgets family diversity and benefits (functionalists)]
Smart
connectedness thesis, more able to influence life course
Argues against Giddens and Beck and Stacey: that wide structural family life still affects us
Murphy
Children born outside of marriage are more likely to underachieve and develop serious illness
Chester
Cohabitation is testing the water before marriage
Fletcher
High expectations are the reason for divorce
Mooney (et al)
Parental conflict has more of an affect than separation
De’Ath and Slater
Conflict in reconstituted families
Allan and Crow
Divided loyalties and difficulties disciplining
Melanie Phillips
Riots caused by absent fathers
Chester
Neo-conventional family - nuclear is the ideal
Rapoports
Cultural diversity
Life course diversity
Organisational diversity
Generational diversity
Social class diversity
Judith Stacey (Post-modern life choices)
diverse famillies, unpredictable
Divorce extended family
Women have been the main agents of change
Individual choice in choosing family
Giddens and Beck
Family is unstable due to greater freedom e.g: serial monogamy (risk society)
individualisation thesis - due to life choices
Elizabeth Bott
Conjugal roles vs segregated roles
Young and Willmott
March of progress, symmetrical families
[eval: Oakley criticises, not drastic change, outdated, negates existing family diversity]
Ann Oakley
Dual burden - men do housework but not enough
Dunscombe and Marsden
Triple shift
Dunne
Gender scripts - same sex couples are equal
Gershuny
Equality, symmetry due to women paid employment. The longer the wife had been in paid work, the more housework the husband did
Oakley criticises this idea, 15% of men found doing housework and childwork
Pahl and Vogler
Pooling and allowance system due to dual income
Edgell
Husband makes all the important decisions in middle class families
Smart
Same sex couples are happy to leave finances to one as they don’t associate it with power
Dobash and Dobash
Domestic violence
Elliot
Not all men are aggressive
Aries
Portraits of children presented them as adults showing that childhood is a construct
Pollock (criticsms of Aries)
Artwork of children doesn’t display their role
Shorter
March of Progress: Childhood has a functional fit with modern society
Gittens
Adults force children to be dependent on them in order to maintain authority (age patriarchy)
Hockey and James
Childhood is an oppressive phase of life and often wish to escape it by acting up/down
Sue Palmer
Toxic childhood, due to fast food and media
Postman
Childhood is disappearing due to media and techonology, decreasing information hierarchy
Opie
Children are still partaking in childlike activities but in different forms due to technology
Jenks
Childhood is changing and adults are dependent on their children as all their other relationships are now unstable
Womack
Childhood is only disappearing for children who are poor
McRobbie
Bedroom culture
Bonke
More expectation for girls to do housework than boys
Brannen
Asian families strict on daughters
What does Pilcher argue?
Childhood is separate as they are protected, clear life stage , golden age in the West
What does Aries argue?
Childhood is a social construct as historical portraits show them dressed as adults
What is a criticism of Aries?
Pollock argues that he generalises and the children were just dressed up
What does Shorter argue?
Societies have become child centred
How is society child centred?
Time and money spent on children
Legislation
How does Gittens evaluate the child centred society?
Adults force children to be dependent on them (age patriarchy)
How is the liberationist view of childhood (Gittens and Hockey and James) evaluated?
Children can’t make rational decisions so must be regulated
Wagg
Childhood is social construct, not universal. This is supported by differences in developing societies:
Puch - responsibilities at young age
Firth - less respect for elders
Malinowski - sexual behaviour
What is toxic childhood?
Rapid changes have damaged children’s development
What are the features of toxic childhood?
Technological change
Increased junk food
Focus on testing in school
Intensive marketing to children
Reasons for childhood changes
1880 compulsory schooling
1889 prevention of cruelty to children
1989 Children Act - Greater welfare provision and living standards
UN Convention of Human Rights 1989
Declining family size & low infant mortality
medical knowledge - donzelot
minimum ages of consent, drinking, finances
What is a criticism of toxic childhood?
First world problems - the real toxic childhood is with children in sweatshops
What is a criticism of Postman?
Opie - children are partaking in childlike activities in different forms
What does Jenks argue?
Childhood is changing
Adults are depending on children as other relationships are unstable
What is a criticism of Jenks?
Lack of evidence
What does Hillman (et al) argue?
Boys could stay out after dark, cross roads, and travel accompanied before girls
What does Bonke argue?
More expectation for girls to perform chores
What do McRobbie and Garber argue?
Bedroom culture - girls socialise inside and boys are encourage to go outside
Althusser (Marxism)
family is an ideological state apparatus
Hirsch
age pyramid
Greer (feminists)
seperatism and matrifocal families
Jeffreys
political lesbianism
SOCIAL POLICY
-One-Child Policy, Nazi Germany bonuses
New Right - Murray -less welfare
Functionalists- Fletcher - increased healthcare, education, housing
Marxists - Wallace, Donzelot- only drives poverty, state controls
Conservatives 1979-91
Child Support Agency 1993
Section 28 - upholds ‘traditional values‘, bans educational talk of homosexuality
“Back to Basics“
Married Men’s Tax allowance
[eval: ideological right wing bias, creates inequalities, negates growing family diversity]
New Labour 1997 -2010
Paternity and maternity leave, working class famillies credit tax, 2004 civil partnership, adoption & children’s act 2002, Civil Partnership 2005
[acknowledges diversity, continued ‘dominant‘ family ideals, while it does help lone parents, access to childcare and work it cuts welfare payments, did not go far enough for rights]
Coalition 2010-2015
Equal marriage for homosexuals 2014, shared parental leave
[eval: cuts public spending, requires more change to match changing atttudes and behaviours]
DEMOGRAPHY AND LIFE PATTERNS Ageing population
Increased to 80 years due to rising life expectancy and declining birth rates. Sociologist: Hirsch. Evaluation: Creates dependency ratio issues (more elderly dependents vs. working population), strain on healthcare and pension systems.
Phillipson - ageing population no longer useful to capitalism, forced dependency
Death Rate & Infant Mortality Rate
Sociologist: Donzelot. Evaluation: Declining rates reflect improved healthcare, sanitation, and living standards.
Effect: care-giving, longer emotional connection, single-person households, sandwhich generation, increased strain on public services
Fertility & Birth Rate
Baby boom, smaller families or single-child famillies increased symetrical couples, children are economic liabilities, child centeredness from parents
Evaluation: Lower rates may indicate changing societal values, increased female education/employment, and access to contraception.
Divorce
Sociologist: Fletcher. Evaluation: Increased divorce rates by 42% can be attributed to rising expectations of marriage, secualrisation, less stigma, changes in law, and increased financial independence of women.
Effect: single-parent famillies, reconstituted, greater choice individual
Childbearing/Childrearing
women having children later, fewer children, none at all 25% choose, 40% born out of wedlock. Due to secularisation , less stigma Evaluation: smaller family sizes, and diverse parenting styles influenced by economic , employment for women
Marriage & Cohabitation
Sociologist: Chester . Evaluation: Declining marriage rates and increasing cohabitation reflect changing attitudes towards costs of marriage, secularisation, risk and instability of marriage , age to marry is 30s. 80% of married couples were cohabiting, greater individual freedom, and secularization.
Effect: individual freedom, diverse partnership choices, single-person households, blended famillies
Beneston (feminist)
women are reserve army of labour