Criminal Law

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/281

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 11:25 AM on 7/6/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

282 Terms

1
New cards

s.81

Necessity: act done in good faith to prevent greater harm, choosing the lesser evil — no offence (but NOT a defence to murder).

2
New cards

s.84

Insanity: no offence if, by unsoundness of mind at the time, the person was incapable of knowing the NATURE of the act OR that it was WRONG/contrary to law.

3
New cards

########## 01 Key Sections (65 cards) ##########

4
New cards

s.34 Penal Code

Acts done by several persons in furtherance of a COMMON INTENTION — each is liable as if he did it alone. Needs a shared plan + participation.

5
New cards

s.44

'Injury' = any harm illegally caused to a person in body, mind, reputation or property.

6
New cards

s.52

'Good faith' = a thing done with DUE CARE and ATTENTION (mere honesty is not enough).

7
New cards

s.76

Act done by a person bound, or who by mistake of fact in good faith believes himself bound, by law — no offence.

8
New cards

s.79

Act done by a person justified, or who by mistake of fact in good faith believes himself justified, by law — no offence.

9
New cards

s.80

Accident: an act done by accident/misfortune, without criminal intent, in a lawful act by lawful means with proper care — no offence.

10
New cards

s.82

Child UNDER 9 years — nothing is an offence (absolute immunity; doli incapax).

11
New cards

s.83

Child 9 and under 12 — exempt only if not mature enough to understand the nature/consequences of the act.

12
New cards

s.85

Involuntary intoxication (without knowledge/against will) — a defence if it caused incapacity to know nature/wrongness.

13
New cards

s.86

Voluntary intoxication is NO defence; the person is treated as having the knowledge he would have had if sober.

14
New cards

s.87-92

Consent provisions: harm suffered by consent is no offence within limits; no valid consent to death/grievous hurt; s.90 vitiates consent by fear/misconception/infancy/insanity.

15
New cards

s.94

Duress: act compelled by threat of INSTANT DEATH — no offence, EXCEPT murder and State offences punishable with death.

16
New cards

s.95

De minimis: harm so slight no person of ordinary sense would complain — no offence.

17
New cards

s.96-98

Right of private defence of body and property; available even against persons exempt (child, insane, intoxicated).

18
New cards

s.99

Limits on private defence: none vs a good-faith public servant; none where time to seek authorities; no more harm than necessary.

19
New cards

s.100

Private defence of the BODY extends to causing DEATH in 6 cases: death, grievous hurt, rape, unnatural lust, kidnapping/abduction, wrongful confinement w/o help.

20
New cards

s.103

Private defence of PROPERTY extends to causing death: robbery, house-breaking by night, arson of dwelling, theft/mischief/trespass raising apprehension of death/grievous hurt.

21
New cards

s.102 / s.105

Commencement & continuance of private defence of body (102) and property (105) — begins with reasonable apprehension, ends when danger ends.

22
New cards

s.106

If defence against deadly assault cannot be made without risk to an innocent person, the right extends to running that risk.

23
New cards

s.107

Abetment = instigation, OR conspiracy (agreement + act in pursuance), OR intentional aiding.

24
New cards

s.108

Abettor = the person who abets; abetment of an abetment is also an offence.

25
New cards

s.109

Where the abetted act is committed and no separate provision applies, the abettor gets the SAME punishment as the principal.

26
New cards

s.115-116

Abetment is punishable EVEN IF the offence is not committed (115 = death/life offences; 116 = imprisonment offences).

27
New cards

s.120A

Criminal conspiracy = an AGREEMENT of two+ persons to do an illegal act, or a legal act by illegal means. (Serious objects: agreement alone suffices.)

28
New cards

s.120B

Punishment for criminal conspiracy.

29
New cards

s.121 / 121A

Waging war against Bangladesh (121, death/life); conspiracy to wage war or overawe Govt by criminal force (121A).

30
New cards

s.124A

Sedition — bringing/exciting hatred, contempt or disaffection towards the lawful Government; lawful criticism is NOT sedition.

31
New cards

s.141

Unlawful assembly = 5+ persons with a common object of one of five forbidden kinds.

32
New cards

s.142

Membership of unlawful assembly = awareness of the unlawful facts + intentionally joining/continuing. (Mere onlooker is NOT a member.)

33
New cards

s.146

Rioting = force/violence used by an unlawful assembly (or any member) in prosecution of the common object.

34
New cards

s.149

Every member of an unlawful assembly is guilty of an offence committed in prosecution of the common object, OR which members knew likely.

35
New cards

s.159

Affray = two+ persons fighting in a PUBLIC place, disturbing the public peace.

36
New cards

s.299

Culpable homicide = causing death with intention to cause death / intention to cause injury likely to cause death / knowledge it is likely to cause death.

37
New cards

s.300

Murder = culpable homicide + one of 4 aggravating mental states, and NO Exception applies.

38
New cards

s.302

Punishment for murder: death, or imprisonment for life, and fine.

39
New cards

s.304

Punishment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder (Part I: intention; Part II: knowledge only).

40
New cards

s.304A

Causing death by a RASH or NEGLIGENT act not amounting to culpable homicide — up to 5 years.

41
New cards

s.309

Attempt to commit suicide — simple imprisonment up to 1 year, or fine, or both (widely criticised; reform urged).

42
New cards

s.319 / s.320

Hurt (319) = bodily pain, disease or infirmity. Grievous hurt (320) = one of EIGHT serious injuries.

43
New cards

s.339

Wrongful restraint = voluntarily obstructing a person from proceeding in a direction he has a RIGHT to take (partial restraint).

44
New cards

s.340

Wrongful confinement = wrongful restraint within CIRCUMSCRIBING LIMITS (total restraint beyond a boundary).

45
New cards

s.349 / s.350

Force (349) = causing motion/contact/sensation. Criminal force (350) = intentional force, without consent, to commit an offence or cause injury/fear/annoyance.

46
New cards

s.351

Assault = a gesture/preparation causing another to apprehend imminent criminal force (no contact needed).

47
New cards

s.359-361

Kidnapping: from Bangladesh (360) or from lawful guardianship (361 — minor male<16/female<18 or unsound mind, without guardian's consent).

48
New cards

s.362

Abduction = by force compelling, or by deceit inducing, a person to go from any place (not an offence alone — needs a further wrongful intent).

49
New cards

s.378

Theft = dishonestly taking movable property out of another's possession, without consent, and moving it.

50
New cards

s.383

Extortion = putting a person in fear of injury and thereby dishonestly inducing delivery of property/valuable security.

51
New cards

s.390 / 391

Robbery (390) = theft/extortion + immediate force/threat. Dacoity (391) = robbery by FIVE or more conjointly.

52
New cards

s.395 / 396

Punishment for dacoity (395); dacoity with murder — all liable (396).

53
New cards

s.399 / 402

Preparation to commit dacoity (399) and assembling for dacoity (402) are themselves punishable.

54
New cards

s.403

Criminal misappropriation = dishonestly misappropriating/converting movable property (possession came innocently).

55
New cards

s.405

Criminal breach of trust = dishonest misappropriation/conversion of property ENTRUSTED to the accused.

56
New cards

s.406-409

Aggravated breach of trust: by carrier (407), clerk/servant (408), public servant/banker (409).

57
New cards

s.410 / 411

Stolen property (410); dishonestly receiving/retaining stolen property knowing it stolen (411).

58
New cards

s.415 / 420

Cheating (415) = deception + fraudulent/dishonest inducement + delivery/act + harm. s.420 = cheating + dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

59
New cards

s.416

Cheating by personation = cheating by pretending to be some other person (real or imaginary).

60
New cards

s.425

Mischief = causing wrongful loss/damage by destroying property OR diminishing its value/utility (no destruction needed).

61
New cards

s.441

Criminal trespass = entering/remaining on another's property with intent to commit an offence or to intimidate/insult/annoy.

62
New cards

s.442 / 443 / 445

House-trespass (442); lurking house-trespass (443, concealment); house-breaking (445, entry by one of 6 specified modes).

63
New cards

s.463 / 464

Forgery (463) = making a false document with intent to cause damage/fraud. s.464 = what 'making a false document' means.

64
New cards

s.499

Defamation = imputation harming reputation, by words/signs/visible representation; subject to 10 Exceptions.

65
New cards

s.500

Punishment for defamation: simple imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both.

66
New cards

s.511

Attempt to commit an offence punishable with imprisonment — generally up to HALF the longest term.

67
New cards

########## 02 General Exceptions (18 cards) ##########

68
New cards

What are the General Exceptions?

ss.76-106 — situations where an act that would otherwise be an offence is NOT one. Split into EXCUSABLE (actor not blameworthy) and JUSTIFIABLE (act condoned).

69
New cards

Mistake of fact vs mistake of law

Mistake of FACT (honest, reasonable, good faith) is a defence (ss.76, 79). Mistake of LAW is NO defence — ignorantia juris non excusat.

70
New cards

s.76 vs s.79

s.76: actor believes himself BOUND by law to act. s.79: actor believes himself JUSTIFIED by law. Both need a good-faith mistake of FACT.

71
New cards

Insanity test (s.84)

Legal insanity: at the time of the act, unsoundness of mind made the person incapable of knowing (a) the NATURE of the act, OR (b) that it was WRONG/contrary to law.

72
New cards

Legal vs medical insanity

Medical = merely having a mental illness (not a defence by itself). Legal = the s.84 incapacity AT THE TIME of the act (the only kind that excuses).

73
New cards

Who proves insanity, and to what standard?

The accused (Evidence Act s.105), on the BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES — not beyond reasonable doubt.

74
New cards

Key insanity case

Ashiruddin Ahmed v King — delusion (acting on a command believed divine) depriving the accused of knowing the act was wrong satisfied s.84.

75
New cards

Accident (s.80) — ingredients

(1) accident/misfortune; (2) no criminal intention/knowledge; (3) a lawful act; (4) by lawful means; (5) with proper care & caution. ALL required.

76
New cards

Necessity (s.81) — core idea

Choose the LESSER of two evils, in good faith, without criminal intent, to avoid greater harm. Limit: NOT a defence to murder (R v Dudley & Stephens).

77
New cards

Duress (s.94)

Compulsion by threat of INSTANT death excuses — except murder and State offences punishable with death; and not if the accused voluntarily joined the situation.

78
New cards

Consent — the controls (s.90)

No valid consent if given under fear of injury, or misconception, or by an insane/intoxicated person, or by a child under 12. Cannot consent to be killed.

79
New cards

s.88 (the surgeon)

Act not intended to cause death, done in good faith for the person's BENEFIT, with consent — no offence even if it causes death.

80
New cards

s.92 (emergency)

Good-faith beneficial act WITHOUT consent where consent cannot be obtained in time (emergency).

81
New cards

s.93 (communication)

A communication made in good faith for a person's benefit is no offence even if it harms (e.g. a fatal-shock diagnosis).

82
New cards

De minimis (s.95)

The law ignores trifles — harm so slight a person of ordinary sense/temper would not complain. E.g. brushing past someone in a crowd.

83
New cards

Infancy (ss.82-83)

Under 9: total immunity. 9 to under 12: immune only if lacking the maturity to understand the act. (Bangladesh raised s.82 to 9.)

84
New cards

Voluntary vs involuntary intoxication

Voluntary (s.86): no defence; treated as if sober. Involuntary (s.85): a defence if it caused incapacity to know nature/wrongness of the act.

85
New cards

Burden of proof for an Exception

Normally prosecution proves guilt beyond reasonable doubt; but when an Exception is pleaded, the accused must prove it on the balance of probabilities (Evidence Act s.105).

86
New cards

########## 03 Private Defence (12 cards) ##########

87
New cards

Nature of the right of private defence

A COMPLETE defence (no crime at all) but 'a very narrow and circumscribed right' — a shield, not a sword; ends when the danger ends.

88
New cards

Why does the law grant private defence?

The State cannot protect you at the moment of sudden danger; the right fills that gap and goes no further (a stopgap for the absence of public force).

89
New cards

Limits on private defence (s.99)

No defence against a good-faith public servant; none where there was time to seek the authorities; and never more harm than is necessary.

90
New cards

When may death be caused — body (s.100)?

6 cases: apprehension of (1) death, (2) grievous hurt, (3) rape, (4) gratifying unnatural lust, (5) kidnapping/abduction, (6) wrongful confinement w/o access to help.

91
New cards

When may death be caused — property (s.103)?

Robbery; house-breaking by night; arson of a dwelling; theft/mischief/house-trespass causing reasonable apprehension of death or grievous hurt.

92
New cards

When does the right begin and end (body)?

s.102: begins as soon as a reasonable apprehension of danger arises; continues while it lasts; ends once the danger is over (no retaliation).

93
New cards

Private defence against an innocent person

s.106: if you cannot defend against a deadly assault without risk to an innocent person, the right extends to running that risk.

94
New cards

Is private defence available against a child/lunatic?

Yes (s.98) — the right exists even where the attacker is exempt from liability (child, insane, intoxicated), because the danger is real.

95
New cards

Private defence vs retaliation

The right is PREVENTIVE, not punitive. Once the attacker is disarmed/disabled/fleeing, a further blow is retaliation and outside the right.

96
New cards

Key cases on private defence

Munney Khan v State (scope/limits); Ram Swarup (right is not a pretext for aggression; must be proportionate).

97
New cards

Future threat and private defence

A threat of FUTURE harm gives no right of private defence — there is time to seek the authorities (s.99); the danger is not imminent.

98
New cards

Exceeding private defence

If you exceed what is necessary in good faith and cause death, Exception 2 to s.300 reduces murder to culpable homicide (s.304).

99
New cards

########## 04 Homicide Murder (16 cards) ##########

100
New cards

Culpable homicide (s.299)

Causing death by an act done with: intention to cause death / intention to cause injury likely to cause death / knowledge the act is likely to cause death.